Three neglected numbers in the CBC: The RDW, MPV, and NRBC count ================================================================ * Jori E. May * Marisa B. Marques * Vishnu V.B. Reddy * Radhika Gangaraju ## ABSTRACT The complete blood cell count (CBC) is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests, but some values included in the test may be overlooked. This brief review discusses 3 potentially underutilized components of the CBC: the red blood cell distribution width (RDW), the mean platelet volume (MPV), and the nucleated red blood cell (NRBC) count. These results have unique diagnostic applications and prognostic implications that can be incorporated into clinical practice. By understanding all components of the CBC, providers can learn more about the patient’s condition. KEY POINTS * The RDW can help differentiate the cause of anemia: eg, a high RDW suggests iron-deficiency anemia, while a normal RDW suggests thalassemia. Studies also suggest that a high RDW may be associated with an increased rate of all-cause mortality and may predict a poor prognosis in several cardiac diseases. * The MPV can be used in the evaluation of thrombocytopenia. Furthermore, emerging evidence suggests that high MPV is associated with worse outcomes in cardiovascular disorders. * An elevated NRBC count may predict poor outcomes in a number of critical care settings. It can also indicate a serious underlying hematologic disorder. The complete blood cell count (CBC) is one of the most frequently ordered laboratory tests in both the inpatient and outpatient settings. Not long ago, the CBC required peering through a microscope and counting the red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets. These 3 numbers are still the primary purpose of the test. Now, with automated counters, the CBC report also contains other numbers that delineate characteristics of each cell type. For example: **The mean corpuscular volume** is the average volume of red blood cells. Providers use it to classify anemia as either microcytic, normocytic, or macrocytic, each with its own differential diagnosis. **The differential white blood cell count** provides absolute counts and relative percentages of each type of leukocyte. For example, **the absolute neutrophil count** is an important measure of immunocompetence. But other values in the CBC may be overlooked, even though they can provide important information. Here, we highlight 3 of them: * **The red blood cell distribution width** (RDW) * **The mean platelet volume** (MPV) * **The nucleated red blood cell** (NRBC) **count**. In addition to describing their diagnostic utility, we also discuss emerging evidence of their potential prognostic significance in hematologic and nonhematologic disorders. By incorporating an awareness of their value in clinical practice, providers can maximize the usefulness of the CBC. ## RED BLOOD CELL DISTRIBUTION WIDTH The RDW is a measure of variation (anisocytosis) in the size of the circulating red cells. The term “width” is misleading, as the value is not derived from the width of the red blood cell, but rather from the width of the distribution curve of the corpuscular volume (Figure 1). Therefore, a normal RDW means that the cells are all about the same size, while a high RDW means they vary widely in size. ![Figure 1](http://www.ccjm.org/https://www.ccjm.org/content/ccjom/86/3/167/F1.medium.gif) [Figure 1](http://www.ccjm.org/content/86/3/167/F1) Figure 1 A: Example of a normal red blood cell distribution width (RDW) of 13.5% (red line) in a patient with a normal complete blood cell count. B: Example of an increased RDW of 28.8% in a patient with iron deficiency shortly after initiation of iron supplementation. The RDW can be calculated either as a coefficient of variation, with a reference range of 11% to 16% depending on the laboratory, or, less often, as a standard deviation, with a reference range of 39 to 46 fL. ### The RDW can differentiate between causes of anemia **A high RDW** is often found in nutritional deficiencies of iron, vitamin B12, and folate. This information is helpful in differentiating the cause of microcytic anemia, as a high RDW suggests iron-deficiency anemia while a normal RDW suggests thalassemia.1 In iron deficiency, the RDW often rises before the mean corpuscular volume falls, serving as an early diagnostic clue. The RDW can also be high after recent hemorrhage or rapid hemolysis, as the acute drop in hemoglobin results in increased production of reticulocytes, which are larger than mature erythrocytes. Because a range of disorders can elevate the RDW, reviewing the peripheral blood smear is an important next step in the diagnostic evaluation, specifically looking for reticulocytes, microspherocytes, and other abnormal red blood cells contributing to the RDW elevation. **A normal RDW** is less diagnostically useful. It indicates the red blood cells are of uniform size, but they may be uniformly small or large depending on how long the anemia has persisted. Since red cells circulate for only about 120 days, patients who have severe iron-deficiency anemia for months to years are expected to have a normal rather than a high RDW, as their red cells of normal size have all been replaced by microcytes. **A low RDW** is not consistently associated with any hematologic disorder. ### RDW may have prognostic value Emerging data suggest that the RDW may also have prognostic value in nonhematologic diseases. In a retrospective study of 15,852 adult participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (1988–1994), a higher RDW was associated with a higher risk of death, with the all-cause mortality rate increasing by 23% for every 1% increment in RDW.2 This correlation is particularly prominent in cardiac disorders. In 2 large retrospective studies of patients with symptomatic heart failure, a higher RDW was a strong predictor of morbidity and death (hazard ratio 1.17 per 1-standard deviation increase, *P* < .001), even stronger than more commonly used variables such as ejection fraction, New York Heart Association functional class, and renal function.3 In a retrospective analysis of 4,111 patients with myocardial infarction, the degree of RDW elevation correlated with the risk of repeat nonfatal myocardial infarction, coronary death, new symptomatic heart failure, and stroke.4 It is hypothesized that high RDW may reflect poor cell membrane integrity from altered cholesterol content, which in turn has deleterious effects on multiple organ systems and is therefore associated with adverse outcomes.5 Currently, using the RDW to assess prognosis remains investigational, and how best to interpret it in daily practice requires further study. ## MEAN PLATELET VOLUME The MPV, ie, the average size of platelets, is reported in femtoliters (fL). Because the MPV varies depending on the instrument used, each laboratory has a unique reference range, usually about 8 to 12 fL. The MPV must be interpreted in conjunction with the platelet count; the product of the MPV and platelet count is called the *total platelet mass*. ### Using the MPV to find the cause of thrombocytopenia The MPV can be used to help narrow the differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia. For example, it is high in thrombocytopenia resulting from peripheral destruction, as in immune thrombocytopenic purpura. This is because as platelets are lost, thrombopoietin production increases and new, larger platelets are released from healthy megakaryocytes in an attempt to increase the total platelet mass. In contrast, the MPV is low in patients with thrombocytopenia due to megakaryocyte hypoplasia, as malfunctioning megakaryocytes cannot maintain the total platelet mass, and any platelets produced remain small. This distinction can be obscured in the setting of splenomegaly, as larger platelets are more easily sequestered in the spleen and the MPV may therefore be low or normal. The MPV can also be used to differentiate congenital thrombocytopenic disorders, which can be characterized by either a high MPV (eg, gray platelet syndrome, Bernard-Soulier syndrome) or a low MPV (eg, Wis-kott-Aldrich syndrome) (Figure 2). ![Figure 2](http://www.ccjm.org/https://www.ccjm.org/content/ccjom/86/3/167/F2.medium.gif) [Figure 2](http://www.ccjm.org/content/86/3/167/F2) Figure 2 Giant platelets (thin arrows), normal sized platelets (dotted arrows), and a nucleated red blood cell (thick arrow) in a patient with myelofibrosis and extensive extramedullary hematopoiesis. ### MPV may have prognostic value Evidence suggests that the MPV also has potential prognostic value, particularly in vascular disease, as larger platelets are hypothesized to have increased hemostatic potential. In a large meta-analysis of patients with coronary artery disease, a high MPV was associated with worse outcomes; the risk of death or myocardial infarction was 17% higher in those with a high MPV (the threshold ranged from 8.4 to 11.7 fL in the different studies) than in those with a low MPV.6 In a study of 213 patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, the risk of significant coronary artery disease was 4.18 times higher in patients with a high MPV and a high troponin level than in patients with a normal MPV and a high troponin.7 The authors suggested that a high MPV may help identify patients at highest risk of significant coronary artery disease who would benefit from invasive studies (ie, coronary angiography). This correlation has also been observed in other forms of vascular disease. In 261 patients who underwent carotid angioplasty and stenting, an MPV higher than 10.1 fL was associated with a risk of in-stent restenosis more than 3 times higher.8 The MPV has also been found to be higher in patients with type 2 diabetes than in controls, particularly in those with microvascular complications such as retinopathy or microal-buminuria.9 Conversely, in patients with cancer, a *low* MPV appears to be associated with a poor prognosis. In a retrospective analysis of 236 patients with esophageal cancer, those who had an MPV of 7.4 fL or less had significantly shorter overall survival than patients with an MPV higher than 7.4 fL.10 A low MPV has also been associated with an increased risk of venous thromoboembolism in patients with cancer. In a prospective observational cohort study of 1,544 patients, the 2-year probability of venous thromboembolism was 9% in patients with an MPV less than 10.8 fL, compared with 5.5% in those with higher MPV values. The 2-year overall survival rate was also higher in patients with high MPV than in those with low MPV, at 64.7% vs 55.7%, respectively (*P* = .001).11 But the MPV is far from a perfect clinical metric. Since its measurement is subject to significant laboratory variation, an abnormal value should always be confirmed with evaluation of a peripheral blood smear. Furthermore, it is unclear why a high MPV portends poor prognosis in patients without cancer, whereas the opposite is true in patients with cancer. Therefore, its role in prognostication remains investigational, and further studies are essential to determine its appropriate usefulness in clinical practice.12 ## NUCLEATED RED BLOOD CELL COUNT NRBCs are immature red blood cell precursors not present in the circulation of healthy adults. During erythropoiesis, the common myeloid progenitor cell first differentiates into a proerythroblast; subsequently, the chromatin in the nucleus of the proerythroblast gradually condenses until it becomes an orthochromatic erythroblast, also known as a nucleated red cell (Figure 2). Once the nucleus is expelled, the cell is known as a reticulocyte, which ultimately becomes a mature erythrocyte. Healthy newborns have circulating NRBCs that rapidly disappear within a few weeks of birth. However, NRBCs can return to the circulation in a variety of disease states. ### Causes of NRBCs Brisk hemolysis or rapid blood loss can cause NRBCs to be released into the blood as erythropoiesis increases in an attempt to compensate for acute anemia. Damage or stress to the bone marrow also causes NRBCs to be released into the peripheral blood, as is often the case in hematologic diseases. In a study of 478 patients with hematologic diseases, the frequency of NRBC positivity at diagnosis was highest in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (100%), acute leukemia (62%), and myelodysplastic syndromes (45%).13 NRBCs also appeared at higher frequencies during chemotherapy in other hematologic conditions, such as hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. The mechanism by which NRBCs are expelled from the bone marrow is unclear, though studies have suggested that inflammation or hypoxia or both cause increased hematopoietic stress, resulting in the release of immature red cells. Increased concentrations of inflammatory cytokines (interleukin 6 and interleukin 3) and erythropoietin in the plasma and decreased arterial oxygen partial tension have been reported in patients with circulating NRBCs.14,15 Because they are associated with hematologic disorders, the finding of NRBCs should prompt evaluation of a peripheral smear to assess for abnormalities in other cell lines. ### The NRBC count and prognosis In critically ill patients, peripheral NRBCs can also indicate life-threatening conditions. In a study of 421 adult intensive care patients, the in-hospital mortality rate was 42% in those with peripheral NRBCs vs 5.9% in those without them.16 Further, the higher the NRBC count and the more days that NRBCs were reported in the CBC, the higher the risk of death. In adults with acute respiratory distress syndrome, the finding of any NRBCs in the peripheral blood was an independent risk factor for death, and an NRBC count higher than 220 cells/μL was associated with a more than 3-fold higher risk of death.17 Daily screening in patients in surgical intensive care units revealed that NRBCs appeared an average of 9 days before death, consistent with an early marker of impending decline.18 In another study,19 the risk of death within 90 days of hospital discharge was higher in NRBC-positive patients, reaching 21.9% in those who had a count higher than 200 cells/μL. The risk of unplanned hospital readmission within 30 days was also increased. ### Leukoerythroblastosis The combination of NRBCs and immature white blood cells (eg, myelocytes, metamyelocytes) is called *leukoerythroblastosis*. Leukoerythroblastosis is classically seen in myelophthisic anemias in which hematopoietic cells in the marrow are displaced by fibrosis, tumor, or other space-occupying processes, but it can also occur in any situation of acute marrow stress, including critical illness. In addition, leukoerythroblastosis appears in a rare complication of sickle cell hemoglobinopathies: bone marrow necrosis with fat embolism syndrome.20,21 As the marrow ne croses, fat emboli are released in the systemic circulation causing micro- and macrovascular occlusions and multiorgan failure. The largest case series in the literature reports 58 patients with bone marrow necrosis with fat embolism syndrome.22 At our institution, we have seen 18 patients with this condition in the past 8 years, with the frequency of diagnosis increasing with heightened awareness of the disorder. We have found that leukoerythroblastosis is often an early marker of this unrecognized syndrome and can prompt emergency red cell exchange, which is considered to be lifesaving in this condition.22 These examples and many others show that the presence of NRBCs in the CBC can serve as an important clinical warning. ## OLD TESTS CAN STILL BE USEFUL The CBC provides much more than simple cell counts; it is a rich collection of information related to each blood cell. These days, with new diagnostic tests and prognostic tools based on molecular analysis, it is important to not overlook the value of the tests clinicians have been ordering for generations. The RDW, MPV, and NRBC count will not likely provide definitive or flawless diagnostic or prognostic information, but when understood and used correctly, they provide readily available, cost-effective, and useful data that can supplement and guide clinical decision-making. By understanding the CBC more fully, providers can maximize the truly complete nature of this routine laboratory test. * Copyright © 2019 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved. ## REFERENCES 1. Lima CS, Reis AR, Grotto HZ, Saad ST, Costa FF. Comparison of red cell distribution width and a red cell discriminant function incorporating volume dispersion for distinguishing iron deficiency from beta thalassemia trait in patients with microcytosis. Sao Paulo Med J 1996; 114(5):1265–1269. pmid:9239926 [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=9239926&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 2. Perlstein TS, Weuve J, Pfeffer MA, Beckman JA. Red blood cell distribution width and mortality risk in a community-based prospective cohort. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(6):588–594. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.55 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinternmed.2009.55&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19307522&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000264487600009&link_type=ISI) 3. Felker GM, Allen LA, Pocock SJ, et alCHARM Investigators. Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007; 50(1):40–47. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2007.02.067 [FREE Full Text](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6MzoiUERGIjtzOjExOiJqb3VybmFsQ29kZSI7czo0OiJhY2NqIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjc6IjUwLzEvNDAiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMDoiL2Njam9tLzg2LzMvMTY3LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 4. Tonelli M, Sacks F, Arnold M, Moye L, Davis B, Pfeffer M, for the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Trial Investigators. Relation between red blood cell distribution width and cardiovascular event rate in people with coronary disease. Circulation 2008; 117(2):163–168. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.727545 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTQ6ImNpcmN1bGF0aW9uYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjExNy8yLzE2MyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIwOiIvY2Nqb20vODYvMy8xNjcuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 5. Goldstein MR, Mascitelli L, Pezzetta F. Is red cell distribution width a marker of overall membrane integrity? [Letter] Arch Intern Med 2009; 169(16):1539–1540. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2009.275 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1001/archinternmed.2009.279&link_type=DOI) 6. Sansanaydhu N, Numthavaj P, Muntham D, et al. Prognostic effect of mean platelet volume in patients with coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2015; 114(6):1299–1309. doi:10.1160/TH15-04-0280 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1160/TH15-04-0280&link_type=DOI) 7. Taskesen T, Sekhon H, Wroblewski I, et al. Usefulness of mean platelet volume to predict significant coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes. Am J Cardiol 2017; 119(2):192–196. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.042 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.09.042&link_type=DOI) 8. Dai Z, Gao J, Li S, et al. Mean platelet volume as a predictor for restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting. Stroke 2018; 49:(4)872–876. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019748 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjg6IjQ5LzQvODcyIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjA6Ii9jY2pvbS84Ni8zLzE2Ny5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 9. Papanas N, Symeonidis G, Maltezos E, et al. Mean platelet volume in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Platelets 2004; 15:(8)475–478. doi:10.1080/0953710042000267707 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1080/0953710042000267707&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15763888&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000225393400002&link_type=ISI) 10. Shen W, Cui MM, Wang X, Wang RT. Reduced mean platelet volume is associated with poor prognosis in esophageal cancer. Cancer Biomark 2018; 22(3):559–563. doi:10.3233/CBM-181231 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3233/CBM-181231&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 11. Riedl J, Kaider A, Reitter EM, et al. Association of mean platelet volume with risk of venous thromboembolism and mortality in patients with cancer. Results from the Vienna Cancer and Thrombosis Study (CATS). Thromb Haemost 2014; 111(4):670–678. doi:10.1160/TH13-07-0603 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1160/TH13-07-0603&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24306221&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 12. Tsiara S, Elisaf M, Jagroop IA, Mikhailidis DP. Platelets as predictors of vascular risk: is there a practical index of platelet activity? Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2003; 9(3):177–190. pmid:14507105 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1177/107602960300900301&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=14507105&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000185030800001&link_type=ISI) 13. Danise P, Maconi M, Barrella F, et al. Evaluation of nucleated red blood cells in the peripheral blood of hematological diseases. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 50(2):357–360. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2011.766 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/CCLM.2011.766&link_type=DOI) 14. Stachon A, Bolulul O, Holland-Letz T, Krieg M. Association between nucleated red blood cells in blood and the levels of erythropoietin, interleukin 3, interleukin 6, and interleukin 12p70. Shock 2005; 24(1):34–39. pmid:15988318 [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15988318&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 15. Kuert S, Holland-Letz T, Friese J, Stachon A. Association of nucleated red blood cells in blood and arterial oxygen partial tension. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011; 49(2):257–263. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2011.041 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/CCLM.2011.041&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=21118046&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 16. Stachon A, Holland-Letz T, Krieg M. In-hospital mortality of intensive care patients with nucleated red blood cells in blood. Clin Chem Lab Med 2004; 42(8):933–938. doi:10.1515/CCLM.2004.151 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/CCLM.2004.151&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15387445&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) 17. Menk M, Giebelhäuser L, Vorderwülbecke G, et al. Nucleated red blood cells as predictors of mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS): an observational study. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8(1):42. doi:10.1186/s13613-018-0387-5 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13613-018-0387-5&link_type=DOI) 18. Stachon A, Kempf R, Holland-Letz T, Friese J, Becker A, Krieg M. Daily monitoring of nucleated red blood cells in the blood of surgical intensive care patients. Clin Chim Acta 2006; 366(1–2):329–335. doi:10.1016/j.cca.2005.11.022 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.cca.2005.11.022&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16388791&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000236378200043&link_type=ISI) 19. Purtle SW, Horkan CM, Moromizato T, Gibbons FK, Christopher KB. Nucleated red blood cells, critical illness survivors and postdischarge outcomes: a cohort study. Crit Care 2017; 21(1):154. doi:10.1186/s13054-017-1724-z [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1186/s13054-017-1724-z&link_type=DOI) 20. May J, Sullivan JC, LaVie D, LaVie K, Marques MB. Inside out: bone marrow necrosis and fat embolism complicating sickle-beta+ thalassemia. Am J Med 2016; 129(12):e321–e324. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.027 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.027&link_type=DOI) 21. Gangaraju R, Reddy VV, Marques MB. Fat embolism syndrome secondary to bone marrow necrosis in patients with hemoglobinopathies. South Med J 2016; 109(9):549–553. doi:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000520 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000520&link_type=DOI) 22. Tsitsikas DA, Gallinella G, Patel S, Seligman H, Greaves P, Amos RJ. Bone marrow necrosis and fat embolism syndrome in sickle cell disease: increased susceptibility of patients with non-SS genotypes and a possible association with human parvovirus B19 infection. Blood Rev 2014; 28(1):23–30. doi:10.1016/j.blre.2013.12.002 [CrossRef](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.blre.2013.12.002&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ccjm.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=http://www.n&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fccjom%2F86%2F3%2F167.atom)