Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • AACE 2026
    • Kidney Week 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • AACE 2026
    • Kidney Week 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
Review

Sex-specific risk factors for stroke in women: Focus on the 2024 AHA/ASA guideline

Paru S. David, MD, MSCP, Hannah Nordhues, MD, MSCP and Suneela Vegunta, MD, MSCP
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2026, 93 (5) 297-303; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.93a.25049
Paru S. David
Consultant, Division of Women’s Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: david.paru{at}mayo.edu
Hannah Nordhues
Consultant, Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suneela Vegunta
Consultant, Division of Women’s Health, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

ABSTRACT

Women are less likely to have a stroke compared with men, but certain sex-specific risk factors can increase their risk for ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke later in life. The 2024 American Heart Association and American Stroke Association guideline for primary prevention of stroke emphasizes female-specific factors that increase risk for stroke, including adverse pregnancy outcomes, premature and early menopause, endometriosis, and certain hormone therapies (eg, combined hormonal contraceptives). This review explores these sex-specific risk enhancers and highlights the importance of a detailed gynecologic and obstetric history when assessing stroke risk in women.

KEY POINTS
  • Medical disorders and complications during pregnancy (eg, gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders) can increase risk of stroke and cardiovascular disease later in life.

  • Early menopause (before age 45) and premature menopause (before age 40) are associated with increased stroke risk. Treatment with estrogen replacement therapy, when appropriate, may mitigate much of the excess risk.

  • Endometriosis is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and stroke via inflammatory, biological, vascular, and hormonal mechanisms.

  • A detailed gynecologic and obstetric history in women is crucial for identifying and addressing stroke risk factors.

Approximately 800,000 people in the United States experience a stroke each year, and stroke remains the country’s fifth leading cause of death.1,2 Most strokes are ischemic (87%), with intracerebral (10%) and subarachnoid (3%) hemorrhagic strokes accounting for the remainder.3 Just over half (51.8%) of strokes occur in women.3

Throughout most of the lifespan, men are more likely than women to have a stroke. After age adjustment, men have an approximately 30% higher stroke incidence than women, until about age 75 to 85 years, after which incidence is similar between women and men.4 This rise in women’s risk for stroke later in life can be related to the presence of certain sex-specific risk factors.

The 2024 guideline for the primary prevention of stroke from the American Heart Association (AHA) and American Stroke Association (ASA)2 emphasizes several female-specific factors as risk-enhancers, including adverse pregnancy-related outcomes, premature or early menopause, endometriosis, and certain hormone therapies. These factors largely exert their influence on ischemic stroke risk through mechanisms involving atherosclerosis and endothelial dysfunction.5

Identifying stroke risk factors early provides an opportunity for timely counseling, aggressive risk-factor modification, and individualized preventive strategies, including judicious use of hormone therapy when indicated. As such, the AHA/ASA guideline underscores the need to incorporate these factors into routine cardiovascular risk assessment. This review explores the sex-specific risk factors outlined in the AHA/ASA guideline2 and highlights the importance of obtaining a detailed gynecologic and obstetric history when caring for women, especially when considering stroke risk.

ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES

Medical disorders and complications during pregnancy can signal potential health issues later in life. Gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are common pregnancy complications that significantly affect both maternal and fetal health. Although these conditions are often viewed as temporary and typically resolve after childbirth, emerging evidence suggests that women who experience either of them are at higher risk for chronic metabolic conditions later in life, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease, including ischemic stroke, as outlined below.6

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Once considered a temporary condition during pregnancy, gestational diabetes mellitus is now recognized for its long-term health impacts. Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus have a 10-fold higher lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus than women without gestational diabetes and have a significantly higher risk of chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease.7 These factors independently and cumulatively increase the risk of ischemic stroke; however, a history of gestational diabetes mellitus alone doubles the risk of future cardiovascular diseases, including ischemic stroke.8

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

Characterized by elevated blood pressure during pregnancy, these disorders include preexisting hypertension, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia. Gestational hypertension is defined as new-onset hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg) occurring after 20 weeks of gestation without proteinuria or other systemic findings. Blood pressure typically normalizes by 12 weeks post partum.9

Preeclampsia affects approximately 2% to 8% of pregnancies and is defined as new-onset hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 140 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 90 mm Hg) after 20 weeks of gestation, with proteinuria or signs of end-organ dysfunction.9,10 Eclampsia, a severe form of preeclampsia with seizure and encephalopathy, can occur as a progression of preeclampsia, spontaneously, or post partum.10

Pathogenic mechanisms in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy include placental maladaptation, endothelial dysfunction, and dysregulation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.11

Regarding maternal health later in life, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease, chronic hypertension, both hemorrhagic and ischemic stroke, and renal disease.2 Based on a meta-analysis, women with a history of preeclampsia have an 81% higher risk of stroke compared with those without preeclampsia.12 Preeclampsia is now recognized as an independent cardiovascular risk factor.13

Women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy should be advised about their increased risk of future stroke. Other pregnancy-related risk factors that have been associated with an increased risk of stroke later in life include recurrent pregnancy loss, preterm birth, placental abruption, small-for-gestational-age infant, and stillbirth.2,12

PREMATURE AND EARLY MENOPAUSE

Menopause is defined by 12 consecutive months without menstruation; for 90% of individuals, this will occur between age 46 and 56 years.2 It is marked by the loss of follicular ovarian function and accompanied by a significant decline in ovarian estrogen production. Menopause that occurs before age 40 is considered premature, and menopause that occurs before age 45 is considered early. About 5% of women experience early menopause naturally, while many more will experience it either surgically (bilateral oophorectomy) or medically (chemotherapy, ovarian suppression, radiation therapy).2

The most recent AHA/ASA guidelines for lipid-lowering therapy and primary prevention of stroke recognize premature menopause and early menopause as risk-enhancing factors to consider during clinical risk assessment.2,14,15

Mechanisms and evidence on stroke risk

Multiple cardiovascular risk factors begin accumulating around the menopause transition, and cardiovascular risk doubles in the first 10 years after menopause.16 Multifactorial mechanisms account for increased stroke risk during this time and are incompletely understood. The decline in estrogen leads to a relative androgen excess, which may contribute to the accelerated rate of risk-factor accumulation.2,16,17 Increases in visceral adiposity, triglycerides, low-density lipoprotein, lipoprotein(a), blood glucose, and blood pressure, which peak in late peri- and early postmenopause, can lead to increased vascular disease and stroke risk.14,16,18,19 In premature menopause, however, stroke risk increases well before the resulting blood pressure and lipid changes, indicating a more complex mechanism than accumulation of risk factors alone.2

The data are clear that experiencing menopause before age 45 increases stroke risk, irrespective of the etiology.2,20–22 Results from multiple meta-analyses of observational data show that stroke risk rises by at least 20% to 30% in this population.20,22–24 Zhu et al23 analyzed pooled data from multiple prospective studies and found incrementally increased risk with lower ages of menopause. Risk of stroke increased 57% in individuals with naturally occurring menopause at age 40 to 44, and 69% when menopause occurred at 35 to 39 years. Analyses of surgical menopause showed similarly increased risk for all types of stroke when oophorectomy was performed under age 48.24,25

Importance of hormone therapy

In many of these studies, excess risk was primarily seen in people who did not use hormone therapy, with a significantly lower risk when hormone therapy was provided until at least age 45.21,23,26–28 Estrogen replacement therapy mitigates some, but not all, of the excess stroke risk posed by premature menopause,21,23,26,29,30 so early identification and treatment are essential. Guidelines for the treatment of premature menopause recognize that estrogen has beneficial cardiometabolic impacts and may improve cardiovascular and stroke risk.23,24 Guidelines and experts consistently recommend estrogen replacement therapy at physiologic, premenopausal levels (plus progestogens in women with an intact uterus) until the average age of menopause, unless a contraindication exists.21,29,30

ENDOMETRIOSIS

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory gynecologic condition that affects about 11% of women of reproductive age; its prevalence is higher—30% to 40%—in women presenting with infertility.31,32 Diagnostic laparoscopy and tissue diagnosis may be needed in some symptomatic women suspected to have endometriosis, as imaging methods cannot reliably provide the diagnosis.31,32

Evidence on stroke risk

Several large studies have conclusively and consistently demonstrated an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease and stroke in women with laparoscopically proven endometriosis; in a prospective cohort study, a 34% increased risk of stroke was observed in this population.32,33 A 2023 systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant association between endometriosis and stroke (odds ratio 1.28, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.53; hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.11–1.30).34 Another meta-analysis yielded a stroke risk of 7% to 29% in women with endometriosis.35

Multiple international studies also have consistently demonstrated this elevated risk. A nationwide Danish study of over 60,000 women with endometriosis and more than 240,000 matched controls reported a 15% increased risk of stroke.36 Similarly, a United Kingdom–based study identified a 19% increased risk of stroke in women with endometriosis.37 While the absolute risk of ischemic stroke was low in a Canadian retrospective population-based cohort study, the reported increases in risk for stroke were similar to those in other international studies.38

Mechanisms

Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain the observed link between endometriosis and stroke, including inflammatory, biological, vascular, and hormonal factors.

Chronic systemic inflammation due to diffuse extrauterine endometrial lesions can lead to extravasation of activated macrophages and proinflammatory cytokines into the peritoneal fluid, which can contribute to endothelial dysfunction and hypercoagulability.39 Elevated vascular adhesion protein-1 has also been implicated as a contributing factor.40

Multiple hormonal factors may account for the increased risk of stroke with endometriosis. Analysis of data from the Nurses’ Health Study II33 found that hysterectomy and oophorectomy leading to earlier surgical menopause, thereby modifying the vascular risk, accounted for approximately 39% of the association between endometriosis and stroke, while hormone therapies used to treat endometriosis accounted for another 16%.33,41

Coexisting factors in patients with endometriosis such as hypertension, cardiac arrhythmia, or other vascular dysfunction can increase stroke risk.36,37 Also, psychosocial factors such as adversity in early life have been linked to endometriosis and increased lifetime risk for stroke, underscoring the need for a holistic approach to risk assessment.42 Women with endometriosis face higher rates of adverse pregnancy outcomes, which can independently elevate stroke risk and risk for postpartum stroke.43

Combined hormonal contraceptives are used along with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and antagonists for treatment of symptomatic endometriosis. Use of combined hormonal contraceptives independently and synergistically increases the risk for myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke, with a dose-dependent effect when the estrogen dose is greater than 50 μg. A Cochrane review showed that patients who used combined hormonal contraceptives with ethinyl estradiol dosages greater than 30 μg had an increased vascular risk compared with nonusers, but progestin type did not seem to influence the risk.44

The United States medical eligibility criteria recommend using combined hormonal contraceptives that contain less than 35 μg of ethinyl estradiol in women with multiple cardiovascular risk factors and recommend against using combined hormonal contraceptives in patients with a personal history of ischemic heart disease or stroke.45 Most of the currently used combined hormonal contraceptives are formulated as low-dose preparations with less than 35 μg of ethinyl estradiol. In our practice, we tend to start most of our patients on combined hormonal contraceptives containing ethinyl estradiol 30 μg or less.

Unintended pregnancy itself increases adverse health outcomes in women with endometriosis. Therefore, clinicians should consider having shared decision-making discussions with these patients about nonhormonal or lower-risk hormonal options, such as progestin-only methods, for long-term endometriosis management and contraception purposes.46 Of the progestin-only options, depot medroxyprogesterone acetate injection is associated with increased stroke risk, while progestin-only pills containing drospirenone, norgestrel, or norethindrone; etonogestrel insert; and levonorgestrel intrauterine devices are not associated with increased risk.45,47,48

Risk assessment

Although the absolute stroke risk for any individual woman with endometriosis remains low, clinicians should incorporate cardiovascular risk assessment into the routine care of women with endometriosis, particularly in those with additional risk factors such as type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, polycystic ovary syndrome, smoking, premature menopause, and prolonged hormone therapy use.33,46

POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME

Polycystic ovary syndrome is not recognized by the AHA/ASA guideline2 as an independent sex-specific risk factor for stroke; however, it is associated with an increased risk of stroke in women due to the metabolic disorders associated with it. Large cohort studies and meta-analyses consistently report elevated stroke risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. A 2024 meta-analysis of over 1 million women found 71% higher odds of stroke (odds ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.20–2.44).49 Accordingly, the 2023 International Evidence-Based guideline49 recommends assessing cardiovascular risk in women with polycystic ovary syndrome and counseling patients on the elevated risk of stroke.

PREVENTION AND COUNSELING

Obtaining a detailed gynecologic and obstetric history in women is crucial in identifying and addressing risk factors for stroke. Patients with any of these sex-specific risk factors should be informed that their condition can increase risk for stroke in the future. Strategies for primary prevention of stroke must rely heavily on comprehensive lifestyle modification, including a hearthealthy diet, regular physical activity, smoking cessation, and maintaining a healthy weight. Sex-specific risk factors for stroke along with mitigation strategies are summarized in Table 1.2,12,20,23,24,33–36,38,45,47,48

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Sex-specific risk factors for stroke and recommendations for mitigating them

Decisions about monitoring intervals and management should be based on the presence of risk factors and overall assessment of cardiovascular risk.2,29,30

FUTURE RESEARCH

Further research is needed to disentangle the relative contributions of hormonal, inflammatory, and other mechanisms to the increased risk of stroke associated with reproductive health factors. Understanding these mechanisms will be crucial for developing targeted prevention strategies. Additionally, more work is needed to incorporate sex-specific risk factors into risk-prediction models as well as into clinician education about risk prediction and stratification.

TAKE-HOME MESSAGE

Sex-specific factors play a critical and often under-recognized role in shaping lifetime stroke risk in women. Adverse pregnancy outcomes, premature or early menopause, endometriosis, and polycystic ovary syndrome signal heightened risk long before traditional cardiovascular risk factors become apparent. Although further research is needed to clarify underlying mechanisms and refine risk stratification, integrating sex-specific risk factors into clinical practice represents a critical step toward improving stroke prevention and long-term cardiovascular outcomes for women.

DISCLOSURES

The authors report no relevant financial relationships which, in the context of their contributions, could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

  • Copyright © 2026 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Ahmad FB,
    2. Anderson RN
    . The leading causes of death in the US for 2020. JAMA 2021; 325(18):1829–1830. doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5469
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Bushnell C,
    2. Kernan WN,
    3. Sharrief AZ, et al
    . 2024 guideline for the primary prevention of stroke: a guideline from theAmerican Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2024; 55(12): e344–e424. doi:10.1161/STR.0000000000000475
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bushnell C,
    2. McCullough LD,
    3. Awad IA, et al
    . Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2014; 45(5):1545–1588. doi:10.1161/01.str.0000442009.06663.48
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Vyas MV,
    2. Silver FL,
    3. Austin PC, et al
    . Stroke incidence by sex across the lifespan. Stroke 2021; 52(2):447–451. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032898
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hung SK,
    2. Lee MS,
    3. Lin HY, et al
    . Impact of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy on the risk of stroke stratified by subtypes and follow-up time. Stroke 2022; 53(2):338–344. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034109
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kramer CK,
    2. Campbell S,
    3. Retnakaran R
    . Gestational diabetes and the risk of cardiovascular disease in women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2019; 62(6):905–914. doi:10.1007/s00125-019-4840-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Barrett PM,
    2. McCarthy FP,
    3. Evans M, et al
    . Does gestational diabetes increase the risk of maternal kidney disease? A Swedish national cohort study. PLoS One 2022; 17(3):e0264992. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0264992
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee
    . 15. Management of diabetes in pregnancy: standards of care in diabetes-2024. Diabetes Care 2024; 47(suppl 1):S282–S294. doi:10.2337/dc24-S015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Leeman L,
    2. Dresang LT,
    3. Fontaine P
    . Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Am Fam Physician 2016; 93(2):121–127. pmid:26926408
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Sutton ALM,
    2. Harper LM,
    3. Tita ATN
    . Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2018; 45(2):333–347. doi:10.1016/j.ogc.2018.01.012
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Świątkowska-Stodulska R,
    2. Kmieć P,
    3. Stefańska K,
    4. Sworczak K
    . Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathogenesis of pregnancy-induced hypertension. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2018; 126(6):362–366. doi:10.1055/s-0044-102008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wu P,
    2. Haththotuwa R,
    3. Kwok CS, et al
    . Preeclampsia and future cardiovascular health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 2017; 10(2):e003497. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003497
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Arnett DK,
    2. Blumenthal RS,
    3. Albert MA, et al
    . 2019 ACC/AHA guideline on the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74(10):e177–e232. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 74(10):1429-1430. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.011. Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol 2020;75(7):840. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.12.016
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. El Khoudary SR
    . The menopause transition: a critical stage for cardiovascular disease risk acceleration in women. Menopause 2023; 30(5):556–558. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000002172
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Grundy SM,
    2. Stone NJ,
    3. Bailey AL, et al
    . 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019; 139(25):e1082–e1143. doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Seitz A,
    2. Raval AP
    . Menstruation: an important indicator for assessing stroke risk and its outcomes. Stroke 2025; 56(2):533–542. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.048869
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Lisabeth L,
    2. Bushnell C
    . Stroke risk in women: the role of menopause and hormone therapy. Lancet Neurol 2012; 11(1):82–91. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70269-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Derby CA,
    2. Crawford SL,
    3. Pasternak RC,
    4. Sowers M,
    5. Sternfeld B,
    6. Matthews KA
    . Lipid changes during the menopause transition in relation to age and weight: the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation. Am J Epidemiol 2009; 169(11):1352–1361. doi:10.1093/aje/kwp043
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Samargandy S,
    2. Matthews KA,
    3. Brooks MM, et al
    . Trajectories of blood pressure in midlife women: does menopause matter? Circ Res 2022; 130(3):312–322. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.319424
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. ↵
    1. Ley SH,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Tobias DK, et al
    . Duration of reproductive life span, age at menarche, and age at menopause are associated with risk of cardiovascular disease in women. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6(11):e006713. doi:10.1161/JAHA.117.006713
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Faubion SS,
    2. Kuhle CL,
    3. Shuster LT,
    4. Rocca WA
    . Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management. Climacteric 2015; 18(4):483–491. doi:10.3109/13697137.2015.1020484
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Muka T,
    2. Oliver-Williams C,
    3. Kunutsor S, et al
    . Association of age at onset of menopause and time since onset of menopause with cardiovascular outcomes, intermediate vascular traits, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2016; 1(7):767–776. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2016.2415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Zhu D,
    2. Chung HF,
    3. Dobson AJ, et al
    . Type of menopause, age of menopause and variations in the risk of incident cardiovascular disease: pooled analysis of individual data from 10 international studies. Hum Reprod 2020; 35(8):1933–1943. doi:10.1093/humrep/deaa124
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Poorthuis MHF,
    2. Yao P,
    3. Chen Y, et al
    . Risks of stroke and heart disease following hysterectomy and oophorectomy in Chinese premenopausal women. Stroke 2022; 53(10):3064–3071. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.037305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Rocca WA,
    2. Grossardt BR,
    3. Miller VM,
    4. Shuster LT,
    5. Brown RD Jr.
    . Premature menopause or early menopause and risk of ischemic stroke. Menopause 2012; 19(3):272–277. doi:10.1097/gme.0b013e31822a9937
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Rocca WA,
    2. Grossardt BR,
    3. de Andrade M,
    4. Malkasian GD,
    5. Melton LJ 3rd.
    . Survival patterns after oophorectomy in premenopausal women: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 2006; 7(10):821–828. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70869-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shuster LT,
    2. Rhodes DJ,
    3. Gostout BS,
    4. Grossardt BR,
    5. Rocca WA
    . Premature menopause or early menopause: long-term health consequences. Maturitas 2010; 65(2):161–166. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.08.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Sarrel PM,
    2. Sullivan SD,
    3. Nelson LM
    . Hormone replacement therapy in young women with surgical primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 2016; 106(7):1580–1587. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.09.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Panay N,
    2. Anderson RA,
    3. Bennie A, et al
    . Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod Open 2024; 2024(4):hoae065. doi:10.1093/hropen/hoae065
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  29. ↵
    1. ESHRE, ASRM, CREWHIRL and IMS Guideline Group on POI,
    2. Panay N,
    3. Anderson RA, et al
    . Evidence-based guideline: premature ovarian insufficiency. Fertil Steril 2025; 123(2):221–236. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.11.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Mateo
    2. Sánez HA,
    3. Mateo Sánez E,
    4. Hernández AL,
    5. Salazar Ricarte EL
    . Treatment of patients with endometriosis and infertility. Ginecol Obstet Mex 2012; 80(11):705–711. Spanish. pmid:23427639
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Missmer SA,
    2. Hankinson SE,
    3. Spiegelman D,
    4. Barbieri RL,
    5. Marshall LM,
    6. Hunter DJ
    . Incidence of laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis by demographic, anthropometric, and lifestyle factors. Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160(8):784–796. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Farland LV,
    2. Degnan WJ 3rd.,
    3. Bell ML, et al
    . Laparoscopically confirmed endometriosis and risk of incident stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke 2022; 53(10):3116–3122. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039250
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Okoli U,
    2. Charoenngam N,
    3. Ponvilawan B,
    4. Jaroenlapnopparat A,
    5. Mettler S,
    6. Obiejesie O
    . Endometriosis and risk of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2023; 32(12):1328–1339. doi:10.1089/jwh.2023.0091
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Poeta do Couto C,
    2. Policiano C,
    3. Pinto FJ,
    4. Brito D,
    5. Caldeira D
    . Endometriosis and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Maturitas 2023; 171:45–52. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2023.04.001
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Havers-Borgersen E,
    2. Hartwell D,
    3. Ekelund C, et al
    . Endometriosis and long-term cardiovascular risk: a nationwide Danish study. Eur Heart J 2024; 45(44):4734–4743. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Okoth K,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Zemedikun D,
    4. Thomas GN,
    5. Nirantharakumar K,
    6. Adderley NJ
    . Risk of cardiovascular outcomes among women with endometriosis in the United Kingdom: a retrospective matched cohort study. BJOG 2021; 128(10):1598–1609. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16692
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Bougie O,
    2. Blom JN,
    3. Shellenberger J,
    4. Pudwell J,
    5. Brogly SB,
    6. Velez MP
    . Endometriosis as a risk factor for ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a population-based cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2025; 47(5):102798. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2025.102798
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Mormile R
    . Potential hypothesis for the increased risk of stroke in women with endometriosis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024; 292:270. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.11.036
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Danielli M,
    2. Thomas RC,
    3. Quinn LM,
    4. Tan BK
    . Vascular adhesion protein-1 (VAP-1) in vascular inflammatory diseases. Vasa 2022; 51(6):341–350. doi:10.1024/0301-1526/a001031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Bushnell CD,
    2. Kapral MK
    . Stroke in women and unique risk factors. Stroke 2023; 54(2):587–590. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041734
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Gordon JB
    . The importance of child abuse and neglect in adult medicine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2021; 211:173268. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2021.173268
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Nezhat C,
    2. Khoyloo F,
    3. Tsuei A, et al
    . The prevalence of endometriosis in patients with unexplained infertility. J Clin Med 2024; 13(2):444. doi:10.3390/jcm13020444
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Roach RE,
    2. Helmerhorst FM,
    3. Lijfering WM,
    4. Stijnen T,
    5. Algra A,
    6. Dekkers OM
    . Combined oral contraceptives: the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015(8):CD011054. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011054.pub2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Curtis KM,
    2. Nguyen AT,
    3. Tepper NK, et al
    . US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2024. MMWR Recomm Rep 2024; 73(3):1–77. doi:10.15585/mmwr.rr7303a1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Berlanda N,
    2. Somigliana E,
    3. Viganò P,
    4. Vercellini P
    . Safety of medical treatments for endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016; 15(1):21–30. doi:10.1517/14740338.2016.1121991
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Chakhtoura Z,
    2. Canonico M,
    3. Gompel A,
    4. Thalabard JC,
    5. Scarabin PY,
    6. Plu-Bureau G
    . Progestogen-only contraceptives and the risk of stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2009; 40(4):1059–1062. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.538405
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Letnar G,
    2. Andersen KK,
    3. Olsen TS
    . Ischemic stroke in users of combined hormonal contraceptives: a Danish Registry Study. Stroke 2025; 56(2):276–284. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049252
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Tay CT,
    2. Mousa A,
    3. Vyas A,
    4. Pattuwage L,
    5. Tehrani FR,
    6. Teede H
    . 2023 international evidence-based polycystic ovary syndrome guideline update: insights from a systematic review and meta-analysis on elevated clinical cardiovascular disease in polycystic ovary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13(16):e033572. doi:10.1161/JAHA.123.033572
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Previous
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 93 (5)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 93, Issue 5
1 May 2026
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sex-specific risk factors for stroke in women: Focus on the 2024 AHA/ASA guideline
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
Please verify that you are a real person.
Citation Tools
Sex-specific risk factors for stroke in women: Focus on the 2024 AHA/ASA guideline
Paru S. David, Hannah Nordhues, Suneela Vegunta
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2026, 93 (5) 297-303; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.93a.25049

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sex-specific risk factors for stroke in women: Focus on the 2024 AHA/ASA guideline
Paru S. David, Hannah Nordhues, Suneela Vegunta
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2026, 93 (5) 297-303; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.93a.25049
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES
    • PREMATURE AND EARLY MENOPAUSE
    • ENDOMETRIOSIS
    • POLYCYSTIC OVARY SYNDROME
    • PREVENTION AND COUNSELING
    • FUTURE RESEARCH
    • TAKE-HOME MESSAGE
    • DISCLOSURES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential and heart disease: What every internist needs to know
  • Reversing fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction–associated steatohepatitis—beyond telling patients to lose weight
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Neurology

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2026 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire