@article {Rothberg105, author = {Michael B. Rothberg}, title = {PCI for stable angina: A missed opportunity for shared decision-making}, volume = {85}, number = {2}, pages = {105--121}, year = {2018}, doi = {10.3949/ccjm.85gr.17004}, publisher = {Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine}, abstract = {Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) continues to be frequently performed for patients with stable coronary artery disease, despite clear evidence that it provides minimal benefit over optimal medical therapy and entails small but not inconsequential risks. Many patients and doctors do not fully understand the risks and benefits of PCI, even when presented with the evidence, and this makes informed consent challenging. The best approach is shared decision-making, with doctor and patient together choosing the best treatment option after considering the evidence and the patient{\textquoteright}s preferences.}, issn = {0891-1150}, URL = {https://www.ccjm.org/content/85/2/105}, eprint = {https://www.ccjm.org/content/85/2/105.full.pdf}, journal = {Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine} }