TABLE 2

Meta-analyses evaluating pleural and lung ultrasonography

DiagnosisMeta-analysisNo. of studiesNo. of patientsPooled sensitivity95% confidence intervalPooled specificity95% confidence intervalPositive likelihood ratioNegative likelihood ratio
Pleural effusionYousefifard et al,11 2016121,55494%88%–97%98%92%–100%53.960.06
Acute cardiogenic pulmonary edemaMaw et al,9 201971,07594.1%81.3%– 98.3%92.4%84.2%– 96.4%12.380.06
PneumoniaAlzahrani et al,10 2017202,51385%84%–87%93%92%–95%12.140.16
PneumothoraxAlrajab et al,8 2013a131,51478.6%68.1%–98.1%98.4%97.3%–99.5%49.130.22
  • a Included 1 study that used lung sliding sign alone, 12 studies that used lung sliding and comet tail signs, and 6 studies that included lung point in addition to the other 2 signs.