Canadian Association of Gastroenterology consensus recommendations for and against capsule endoscopya
For gastrointestinal bleeding, capsule endoscopy is recommended: |
In patients with documented overt gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding (excluding hematemesis and negative findings on high-quality upper-GI endoscopy and colonoscopy) |
As soon as possible in patients with an overt, obscure bleeding episode |
Possibly as part of a repeat study (with endoscopy or colonoscopy) in patients with previous negative capsule endoscopy results who continue to have obscure bleeding |
In selected patients with suspected obscure GI bleeding and unexplained mild chronic iron-deficiency anemia |
For celiac disease, capsule endoscopy is recommended: |
In patients with unexplained symptoms despite treatment and appropriate investigations |
… But capsule endoscopy is discouraged: |
To make a diagnosis in patients with suspected celiac disease |
For Crohn disease, capsule endoscopy is recommended: |
In patients presenting with clinical features consistent with Crohn disease and negative ileocolonoscopy and imaging studies |
In patients with Crohn disease and clinical features unexplained by ileocolonoscopy or imaging studies |
In patients with Crohn disease, when the assessment of small-bowel mucosal healing (beyond the reach of ileocolonoscopy) is needed (conditional recommendation) |
In patients with a suspected small-bowel recurrence of Crohn disease after colectomy, undiagnosed by ileocolonoscopy or imaging studies |
For polyposis, capsule endoscopy is recommended: |
For ongoing surveillance in patients with polyposis syndromes who require small-bowel studies (conditional recommendation) |
For colon studies, capsule endoscopy is discouraged: |
As a routine substitute for colonoscopy |
As a substitute for colonoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease to assess the extent and severity of the disease |
↵a The strength of these recommendations is strong, except for the 2 conditional recommendations noted. However, the quality of evidence is low or very low for all.
Based on information in reference 6.