TABLE 1

Trials of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in heart failure

TrialPatientsInterventionPrimary composite end pointPrimary composite results
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
DAPA-HF (2019)84,744 adults
EF ≤ 40%
Established HF
eGFR < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2
Dapagliflozin 10 mgCardiovascular death or worsening heart failure16.3% vs 21.2%
(NNT = 21)
EMPEROR-Reduced (2020)93,730 adults
EF ≤ 40%
Established HF
eGFR < 20 mL/minute/1.73 m2
Empagliflozin 10 mgCardiovascular death or worsening heart failure19.4% vs 24.7%
(NNT = 19)
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
EMPEROR-Preserved (2021)155,988 adults
EF > 40%
New York Heart Association class II–IV HF
eGFR < 20 mL/minute/1.73 m2
Empagliflozin 10 mgCardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure13.8% vs 17.1%
(NNT = 31)
DELIVER-HF (2022)166,263 adults
EF > 40%
Stabilized HF
eGFR > 25 mL/minute/1.73 m2
With or without diabetes mellitus
Dapagliflozin 10 mgCardiovascular death or worsening heart failure16.4% vs 19.5%
(NNT = 32)
Acute decompensated heart failure
EMPULSE (2022)19530 adults
Any EF
Acute decompensated HF
eGFR < 20 mL/minute/1.73 m2
Empagliflozin 10 mgAll-cause death, heart failure events,a Kansas
City Cardiomyopathy
Questionnaire score
53.4% vs 39.7%
Win ratiob 1.36
(95% confidence interval: 1.09–1.68)
SOLOIST-WHF (2021)201,222 adults
Any EF
Acute decompensated HF
eGFR < 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2
Type 2 diabetes
Sotagliflozin 200 or 400 mgEvents of cardiovascular deaths, hospitalizations and urgent visits for heart failure51% vs 76.3%
(NNT = 4)
  • a EMPULSE: heart failure events include heart failure hospitalizations, urgent heart failure visit, unplanned outpatient heart failure visit, and worsening symptoms or intensification of therapy.

  • b Win ratio in favor of empagliflozin; the primary outcome analysis defined a “win” as when, in the common follow-up time, the patient did not die, have an increased number of exacerbations, have an earlier time to first exacerbation, or have a change in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score < 5 points in hierarchal fashion. If any end point was achieved, it was considered a loss. The “wins ratio” was calculated for each group as the ratio of “wins” to “losses.”

  • DAPA-HF = Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Heart Failure; DELIVER-HF = Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients with Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure; EF = ejection fraction; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; EMPEROR-Preserved = Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction; EMPEROR-Reduced = Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and a Reduced Ejection Fraction; EMPULSE = Empagliflozin in Patients Hospitalized With Acute Heart Failure Who Have Been Stabilized; HF = heart failure; NNT = number needed to treat; SOLOIST-WHF = Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure