TABLE 1

Noninvasive and invasive testing methods for Helicobacter pylori

Testing methodProsConsCost (approximate)SensitivitySpecificity
Invasive tests
Endoscopic biopsyAllows direct visualization of H pylori infection
Allows for histological evaluation
Discomfort and risk of complications$$–$$$95%–98%95%–98%
Rapid urease testQuick results (usually within minutes)
Relatively low cost
False negatives can occur with recent proton pump inhibitor use or active bleeding$–$$90%–95%95%–98%
H pylori cultureAllows for antibiotic susceptibility testingTime-consuming and labor-intensive$$–$$$VariableaVariablea
Molecular testing (gastric tissue)High sensitivity and specificity
Can detect resistance mutations
Requires specialized equipment and expertise$$–$$$90%–95%90%–95%
Noninvasive tests
Stool antigen testEasy to collect specimensMay yield false negatives if antigen levels are low$–$$90%–95%90%–95%
Molecular testing (stool)Easy to collect specimens
High sensitivity and specificity
Requires specialized equipment and expertise$$–$$$VariableVariable
Serology (blood test)Easy to performCannot distinguish current infection from past exposure
False positives can occur
$–$$80%–85%80%–85%
Urea breath testWell tolerated
High sensitivity and specificity
Requires abstaining from certain medications (eg, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors) before the test
False positives can occur in the presence of urease-producing bacteria other than H pylori
$$–$$$95%–98%95%–98%
GastroPanelbProvides comprehensive information on gastric healthLimited availability
Interpretation may be complex
$$$VariableVariable
  • a Depending on DNA extraction method.

  • b Combination of immunoglobulin G serology coupled with pepsinogen I and II testing.

  • Based on information from references 8 and 9.