Study | Pts with BMI < 35 kg/m2 | Study design | No. pts | Follow-up (mo) | Remission criteria | Remissiona or change in HbA1c (%) | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dixon28 | 22% | LAGB vs control | 60 | 24 | HbA1c < 6.2% | 73 vs 13 | < .001 |
Schauer29,30,43 | 36% | RYGB vs SG vs control | 150 | 60 | HbA1c ≤ 6.0% | 22 vs 15 vs 0 | < .05 |
Mingrone31,32 | 0% | RYGB vs BPD vs control | 60 | 60 | HbA1c ≤ 6.5% | 42 vs 68 vs 0 | .003 |
Ikramuddin33,34 | 59% | RYGB vs control | 120 | 24 | HbA1c < 6.0% | 44 vs 9 | < .001 |
Liang35 | 100% | RYGB vs control | 101 | 12 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 90 vs 0 vs 0b | < .0001 |
Halperin36 | 34% | RYGB vs control | 38 | 12 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 58 vs 16 | .03 |
Courcoulas37,38 | 43% | RYGB vs LAGB vs control | 69 | 36 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 40 vs 29 vs 0 | .004 |
Wentworth39 | 100% | LAGB vs control | 51 | 24 | FBG < 7.0 mmol/L | 52 vs 8 | .001 |
Parikh40 | 100% | RYGB/LAGB/SG vs control | 57 | 6 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 65 vs 0 | .0001 |
Ding41 | 34% | LAGB vs control | 45 | 12 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 33 vs 23c | .46 |
Cummings42 | 25% | RYGB vs control | 43 | 12 | HbA1c < 6.0% | 60 vs 5.9 | .002 |
Shah44 | 85 | RYGB vs control | 80 | 24 | HbA1c < 6.5% | 60 vs 2.5 | < .001 |
Remission criteria:
↵a Remission was primary or secondary end point; HbA1c value without diabetes medications, unless otherwise specific.
↵b Remission was not precisely defined; HbA1c < 6.5% by extrapolation.
↵c Intermittent diabetes medications.
BMI = body mass index; BPD = biliopancreatic diversion; FBG = fasting blood glucose; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; LAGB = laparoscopic adjustable gastric band; RYGB = Roux-en-Y gastric bypass; SG = sleeve gastrectomy
Modified from Schauer PR, et al. Clinical outcomes of metabolic surgery: efficacy of glycemic control, weight loss, and remission of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:908–911. ©2016 American Diabetes Association. All rights reserved. Material from this publication is used with the permission of American Diabetes Association.