Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tracking Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of an EMR-Based Intervention

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

System level barriers have been associated with inadequate follow-up of abnormal cervical cytology.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate an electronic tracking system to improve follow-up of abnormal Pap tests.

PROGRAM DESCRIPTION

We implemented an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Pap test tracking system at two clinical practices at an inner-city academic health center. The system generated a provider-specific monthly report of all abnormal Pap results, and provided a patient-specific Pap tracking table embedded in the EMR for each subject.

EVALUATION

We compared abnormal Pap test follow-up rates for the 24 months pre-intervention with rates 12 months following its implementation (post-intervention). The evaluation followed all subjects for 12 months from the date of their abnormal Pap test, looking for diagnostic resolution.

RESULTS

Subjects were young women (mean age = 30.5) of primarily white (42%) and African American (37%) descent, who spoke English (88%). Forty-eight percent were insured through publicly subsidized insurance. Controlling for type of abnormality and practice location, the adjusted mean time to resolution decreased significantly from 108 days (confidence interval, CI 105–112 days) in the pre-intervention period to 86 days (CI 81–91 days).

CONCLUSION

Our study cannot demonstrate that with follow up, we directly avoided cases of invasive cervical cancer. However, we show that in an at-risk urban population, an automated, EMR-based tracking system reduced the time to resolution, and increased the number of women who achieved diagnostic resolution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The American Cancer Society. What Are the Key Statistics About Cervical Cancer? http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_are_the_key_statistics_for_cervical_cancer_8.asp. Accessed January 28, 2010.

  2. Schiffman MH, Brinton LA, Devesa SS. Cervical cancer. In: Schottenfeld D, Fraumeni JF, eds. Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996:1090–116.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson NB, Han J, Freund KM. Inadequate follow-up for abnormal Pap smears in an urban population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003;95(9):825–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Leyden WA, Manos MM, Geiger AM, et al. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(9):675–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Marcus AC, Crane LA, Kaplan CP, et al. Improving adherence to screening follow-up among women with abnormal Pap smears: results from a large clinic-based trial of three intervention strategies. Med Care. 1992;30(3):216–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cartwight PS, Reed G. No-show behavior in a county hospital clinic. Am J Gynecol Health. 1990;6:15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Laedtke TW, Dignan M. Compliance with therapy for cervical dysplasia among women of low socioeconomic status. South Med J. 1992;85(1):5–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lane DS. Compliance with referrals from a cancer-screening project. J Fam Pract. 1983;17(5):811–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Carey P, Gjerdingen DK. Follow-up of abnormal Papanicolaou smears among women of different races. J Fam Pract. 1993;37(6):583–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nathoo V. Investigation of non-responders at a cervical cancer screening clinic in Manchester. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1988;296(6628):1041–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Paskett ED, White E, Carter WB, Chu J. Improving follow-up after an abnormal Pap smear: a randomized controlled trial. Prev Med. 1990;19(6):630–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Freund KM, Battaglia TA, Calhoun E, et al. National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program: methods, protocol, and measures. Cancer. 2008;113(12):3391–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Townsend RW. Formation and operation of a captive insurance company for malpractice coverage. Coll Rev. 1988;5:47–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA). Standards and Guidelines for Physician Practice Connections - Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH): 2008.

  15. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4 Suppl):15–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM. Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention. Cancer. 2007;109(2 Suppl):359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study was provided by a grant from the Risk Management Fund at Boston Medical Center. This study was supported by Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA. Preliminary data were presented at the 2009 Annual Meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine in Miami as a poster presentation.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth A. Dupuis MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dupuis, E.A., White, H.F., Newman, D. et al. Tracking Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening: Evaluation of an EMR-Based Intervention. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 575–580 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1287-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1287-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation