Efficacy of calcium channel blocker therapy for angina pectoris resulting from small-vessel coronary artery disease and abnormal vasodilator reserve

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(85)90842-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Abnormal vasodilator reserve of the coronary microcirculation is a frequent mechanism of angina pectoris in patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries. To assess the effect of calcium channel blocking agents on symptoms and exercise capacity, 26 patients shown to have angina pectoris because of abnormally small coronary arteries and limited vasodilator reserve underwent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient study, with 1 month for each period. An unblinded lead-in phase determined the best dose of verapamil (17 patients) or nifedipine (9 patients). Exercise testing using bicycle ergometry was performed at the end of each period. Four patients interrupted the placebo period and 1 patient interrupted both placebo and drug period because of frequent and severe chest pain. While receiving calcium channel blocker drugs, patients who completed both phases of the study recorded fewer episodes of angina (21 ± 21 vs 35 ± 27, p < 0.001) and consumed fewer nitroglycerin tablets (23 ± 27 vs 41 ± 50, p < 0.001) than during the placebo period. Exercise duration was slightly but significantly prolonged (278 ± 129 vs 231 ± 136 seconds, p < 0.025) during drug treatment compared with placebo, and significantly fewer patients terminated exercise with chest pain while receiving drug treatment. Subjectively, 22 of 26 patients felt better on the calcium channel blocker than on placebo. Thus, calcium channel blocker therapy appears to be beneficial in controlling angina and improving exercise tolerance in patients with angina pectoris resulting from abnormally small coronary arteries and limited vasodilator reserve. However, in a few patients angina did not improve and others continued to experience some chest pain on calcium channel blocker therapy. Thus, although these drugs are extremely helpful in the management of most patients with the syndrome, there may be additional causes for limitation in vasodilator reserve that are resistant to calcium channel blockers.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text