Interobserver agreement and accuracy of bedside estimation of right and left ventricular ejection fraction in acute myocardial infarction

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(89)91039-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Ninety-eight patients with acute myocardial infarction were examined by 3 clinicians who, independently of each other, gave an estimate of left ventricular (LV) and right ventricular (RV) ejection fraction (EF) in each patient. Their estimates were based on physical examination, chest x-ray, electrocardiogram, patient history and clinical course during admission. Ejection fractions were estimated as belonging to 1 of 4 categories: normal (LVEF ≥0.53, RVEF ≥0.57), mildly reduced (LVEF 0.40 to 0.52, RVEF 0.45 to 0.56), moderately reduced (LVEF 0.30 to 0.39, RVEF 0.35 to 0.44) or severely reduced (LVEF <0.30, RVEF <0.35). Radionuclide ventriculography was carried out immediately after the physical examination. LVEF was correctly estimated in 43% of all examinations, deviated from radionuclide LVEF by 1 LVEF category in 45% and by 2 LVEF categories in 12%. The 3 clinicians agreed on estimated LVEF in only 32% of the patients. RVEF was correctly estimated in 67% of the examinations, but none of the clinicians identified >43% of the relatively few patients with reduced radionuclide RVEF and they greatly disagreed as to who among the patients had a reduced RVEF. Previous myocardial infarction, electrocardiographic infarct location, Killip class, physical signs of left- and right-sided heart failure, radiographic pulmonary congestion and cardiomegaly were analyzed to determine which were the most helpful in predicting LVEF and RVEF. The results disclosed that several variables, traditionally believed to be reliable indexes of reduced ventricular function, were surprisingly poor predictors of LVEF and RVEF.

References (26)

  • S.E. Epstein et al.

    Evaluation of patients after acute myocardial infarction. Indications for cardiac catheterization and surgical intervention

    N Engl J Med

    (1982)
  • P. Grande et al.

    Optimal diagnosis in acute myocardial infarction. A cost-effectiveness study

    Circulation

    (1980)
  • R.J. Callahan et al.

    A modified method for in vivo labeling of red blood cells with 99mTc: concise communication

    J Nucl Med

    (1982)
  • Cited by (23)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This study was supported by a grant from the Danish Medical Research Council, Copenhagen, Denmark.

    1

    Dr. Gadsbøll is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Medical Faculty, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen.

    View full text