Clinical study
Can moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be diagnosed by historical and physical findings alone?

https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(93)90182-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Background: The value of the history and physical examination in diagnosing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is uncertain. This study was undertaken to determine the best clinical predictors of COPD and to define the incremental changes in the ability to diagnose COPD that occur when the physical examination findings and then the peak flowmeter results are added to the pulmonary history.

Subjects and methods: Ninety-two outpatients with a self-reported history of cigarette smoking or COPD completed a pulmonary history questionnaire and received peak flow and spirometric testing. The subjects were independently examined for 12 physical signs by 4 internists blinded to all other results. Multivariate analyses identified independent predictors of clinically significant, moderate COPD, defined as a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) less than 60% of the predicted value or a FEV1/FVC (forced vital capacity) less than 60%.

Results: Fifteen subjects (16%) had moderate COPD. Two historical variables from the questionnaire—previous diagnosis of COPD and smoking (70 or more pack-years)—significantly entered a logistic regression model that diagnosed COPD with a sensitivity of 40% and a specificity of 100%. Only the physical sign of diminished breath sounds significantly added to the historical model to yield a mean sensitivity of 67% and a mean specificity of 98%. The peak flow result (best cutoff value was less than 200 L/min) significantly added to the models of only one of the four physicians for a mean final sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 95%. Subjects with none of the three historical and physical variables had a 3% prevalence of COPD; this prevalence was unchanged by adding the peak flow results.

Conclusion: Diminished breath sounds were the best predictor of moderate COPD. A sequential increase in sensitivity and a minimal decrease in specificity occurred when the quality of breath sounds was added first to the medical history, followed by the peak flow result. The chance of COPD was very unlikely with a normal history and physical examination.

References (60)

  • R Peto et al.

    The relevance in adults of airflow obstruction, but not of mucous hypersecretion to mortality from chronic lung disease

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1983)
  • AE Camilli et al.

    Longitudinal changes in forced expiratory volume in one second in adults

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1987)
  • B Bates et al.
  • JA Prior et al.

    Physical diagnosis: the history and examination of the patient

  • EL DeGowin et al.

    Bedside diagnostic examination

    EL DeGowin et al.

    Bedside diagnostic examination

  • RD Judge et al.

    Clinical diagnosis: a physiologic approach

  • MH Swartz
  • CL Anderson et al.

    Physiologic significance of sternomastoid contraction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Respir Care

    (1980)
  • CM Fletcher

    The clinical diagnosis of pulmonary emphysema—an experimental study

  • S Lal et al.

    Forced expiratory time: a simple test for airways obstruction

    BMJ

    (1964)
  • JJ Marini et al.

    The significance of wheezing in chronic airflow obstruction

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1979)
  • AR Nath et al.

    Inspiratory crackles—early and late

    Thorax

    (1974)
  • M Ravid et al.

    The “ruler sign”—a semiquantitative physical sign of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

    Isr J Med Sci

    (1988)
  • IC Schneider et al.

    Correlation of clinical signs with ventilatory function in obstructive lung disease

    Ann Intern Med

    (1965)
  • TH Snider et al.

    Simple bedside test of respiratory function

    JAMA

    (1959)
  • DG Stubbing et al.

    Some physical signs in patients with chronic airflow obstruction

    Am Rev Respir Dis

    (1982)
  • TJ Williams et al.

    A clinical and roentgenographic correlation of diaphragmatic movement

    Arch Intern Med

    (1981)
  • T Gjorup et al.

    Interobserver variation in assessment of respiratory signs

    Acta Medica Scandinavica

    (1984)
  • S Godfrey et al.

    Repeatability of physical signs in airways obstruction

    Thorax

    (1969)
  • CD Mulrow et al.

    Observer variability in the pulmonary examination

    J Gen Intern Med

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    This study was funded in part by a grant to Dr. Feinberg by the Clark Family Foundation.

    1

    Drs. Badgett's and Hunt's current addresses: Division of General Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas.

    2

    Dr. Jelley's current address: Department of Internal Medicine, Tulsa Medical College, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, Oklahoma.

    View full text