Original ContributionHigh Resolution MRI of Small Joints: Impact of Spatial Resolution on Diagnostic Performance and SNR
Introduction
The diagnosis of subtle cartilage lesions and the reliable evaluation of changes in cartilage structure are prerequisites to analyze joint trauma as well as inflammatory and non-inflammatory joint disease.1, 2, 3 In addition a precise imaging technique is required to monitor disease progression in patients with joint disease.[4] Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the only imaging modality that can visualize cartilage in three dimensions in arbitrary orientations and non-invasively. Requirements to depict subtle changes in cartilage morphology are substantial and standard imaging sequences are not suited for this application.5, 6, 7, 8 To obtain reliable results high resolution imaging sequences have been used in combination with fat saturation techniques.3, 9, 10
In this study we used optimized fat-saturated high resolution three dimensional gradient-echo (GE) sequences with different spatial resolutions. The diagnostic performance was determined for artificial cartilage lesions created in knee specimens of rabbits and related to the spatial resolution as well as to the lesion size. Additionally signal to noise (SNR) ratios were calculated and image quality assessed in each image.
Section snippets
Animal Model
The experiments were performed with 17 fresh knee joint specimens of adult New Zealand rabbits that were sacrificed in cardiological and ophthalmological studies. All of the knee joints were opened through a medial parapatellar incision. After incision of the joint capsule the patella was dislocated laterally and the joint flexed to obtain an optimal approach to the femoral condyles. In 10 specimens cartilage lesions were created at the medial and lateral femoral condyle while in 7 joints no
ROC Analysis
ROC analysis showed that each of the six radiologists achieved the most accurate results using the sequences with the highest spatial resolution (Table 1). Using pooled data direct comparison showed a decreasing AUC with decreasing matrix size and increasing FOV as well as slice thickness (Fig. 2). These differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Both pathologic and non-pathologic images were evaluated with a higher degree of confidence with the highest matrix size, the smallest
Discussion
The development of surgical and pharmacological methods for the treatment and prevention of chondral degeneration and injury has created a need for an accurate imaging technique for the treatment and prevention of chondral degeneration and injury.15, 16, 17, 18 MRI is the evolving technique for the noninvasive assessment of cartilage. As shown in a previous study, however, major limitations were encountered using standard sequences, optimized for cartilage imaging.[5] With current technologies
Conclusion
In conclusion, we have shown that SNR ratios decrease with increasing spatial resolution. Using a setting applicable to in vivo examinations, even with the highest spatial resolutions SNR levels were adequate to improve diagnostic performance. Using high resolution techniques a reliable diagnosis in cartilage lesions may be obtained, although limitations in correctly assessing lesion size and depth are encountered.
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgments—This work was supported by German Research Society Grant LI 710, 1-1. We are grateful to Evelyn Procter and Niles Bruce for meticulously performing the MRI examinations.
References (25)
- et al.
A system for grading articular cartilage lesions at arthroscopy
Am. J. Sports Med.
(1989) Operative Arthroscopy
(1996)- et al.
Emerging applications of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of articular cartilage
Radiol. Clin. North Am.
(1996) - et al.
Cartilage swelling and loss in a spontaneous model of osteoarthritis visualized by magnetic resonance imaging
Osteoarthritis Cartilage
(1996) - et al.
Artificially produced cartilage lesions in small JointsDetection with optimized MRI-sequences
Magn. Reson. Imaging
(1997) - et al.
Knee joint cartilage defectsA comparative study of MR and anatomic sections
J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.
(1992) - et al.
Width of the articular cartilage of the hipQuantification by using fat suppression spin -echo MR imaging in cadavers
AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.
(1992) - et al.
Abnormalities of articular cartilage in the kneeAnalysis of available MR technique
Radiology
(1993) - et al.
Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulse saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imagingOptimization and validation
Radiology
(1994) - et al.
Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradien-echo FLASH MR Imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities
Radiology
(1996)
High-resolution MR imaging of the wrist and eye with short TR, short TE and partial echo-acquisition
Radiology
Basic principles of ROC analysis
Semin. Nucl. Med.
Cited by (67)
Ultrasound Imaging of the Elbow
2018, Morrey's The Elbow and Its DisordersUltrasonographic Visualization of Anterolateral Complex of the Knee
2017, Operative Techniques in OrthopaedicsCitation Excerpt :To attempt better visualization and characterization of the ALC, musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSK US) began to attract attention as an alternate imaging modality. MSK US represents a cost-effective, readily available diagnostic imaging modality that has advantages in evaluating focused areas of anatomy over MRI due to superior spatial resolution and real-time dynamic imaging capability to account for likely deformational nature of the ALC during movement.26-29 Thus, the aim of the present study was to systematically review the available literature where greyscale sonography was used to visualize the anterolateral knee regions.
Point-of-Care Ultrasound Diagnosis of Deep Space Hand Infection
2016, Journal of Emergency MedicineCitation Excerpt :However, there are advantages of ultrasound over MRI, including that ultrasound can be performed on all patients, including those that are unstable, have contraindications to MRI (metal implants), renal failure, or contrast allergies. Due to its superior resolution, ultrasound can also resolve finer detail than MRI, as a 10-MHz ultrasound probe has an axial resolution of 150 μm, while a 5-T MRI scanner with a field of view of 2 × 6 cm, a matrix of 256 × 256 pixels, and a slice thickness of 0.5 cm yields a resolution of 469 × 469 μm (16,17). As such, ultrasound can demonstrate small foreign bodies, areas of calcification, and tendon tears that are not visualized with MRI (15).
Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Peripheral Nerves
2016, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :The axial in-plane resolution of a 10-MHz probe is approximately 150 μm.1 In comparison, approximate resolution of a common clinical MRI is 450 μm.2 Clinical imaging transducers can reach frequencies up to 18 MHz, with further improvements in resolution.