Original article
Adult cardiac
Five Hundred Cases of Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Predictors of Success and Safety

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.09.071Get rights and content

Background

Robotic technology has enabled totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) grafting. Little information is available on factors associated with successful and safe performance of TECAB. We report a 10-year multicenter experience with 500 cases, elucidating on predictors of success and safety in TECAB procedures.

Methods

Between 2001 and 2011, 500 patients (364 [73%] men; 136 [27%] women; median age [minimum-maximum] 60 years [31−90 years], median EuroSCORE 2 [0−13]), underwent TECAB. Single, double, triple, and quadruple TECAB was performed in 334, 150, 15, and 1 patient, respectively. Univariate analysis and binary regression models were used to identify predictors of success and safety. Success was defined as freedom from any adverse event and conversion procedure, safety was defined as freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebral events, major vascular injury, and long-term ventilation.

Results

Success and safety rates were 80% (400 cases) and 95% (474 cases), respectively. Intraoperative conversions to larger thoracic incisions were required in 49 (10%) patients. The median operative time was 305 minutes (112−1,050 minutes), and the mean lengths of stay in the intensive unit (ICU) and in hospital were 23 hours (11−1,048 hours) and 6 days (2−4 days), respectively. Independent predictors of success were single-vessel TECAB (p = 0.004), arrested-heart (AH)-TECAB (p = 0.027), non−learning curve case (p = 0.049), and transthoracic assistance (p = 0.035). The only independent predictor of safety was EuroSCORE (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

Single-vessel and multivessel TECAB procedures can be safely performed with good reproducible results. Predictors of success include procedure simplicity and non−learning curve cases, whereas predictors of safety are mainly associated with patient selection.

Section snippets

Patients and Methods

From October 2001 to June 2011, 500 patients (364 [73%] men, 136 [27%] women; mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 62 ± 9; mean EuroSCORE= 2.3 ± 2.1), underwent TECAB using the da Vinci, da Vinci S, and Da Vinci Si telemanipulation systems (Intuitive Surgical, Inc, Sunnyvale, CA) at the Department of Cardiac Surgery, Innsbruck Medical University and the Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Maryland by 4 primary surgeons (J.B., T.S., N. B., E. L.). Three additional surgeons have been

Operative and Hospital Outcomes

The procedures performed included single-vessel (n = 334 [67%]) and multivessel robotically assisted TECAB (n = 166 [33%]) on the arrested heart (AH) (n = 390 [88%]) or the beating heart (BH) (n = 110 [22%]). One third of the procedures were planned as hybrid procedures. The main intraoperative data and the postoperative outcome are presented in Table 3.

Postoperative Outcomes Stratified by Successful Procedures

The overall success rate after TECAB was 80 % (n = 400). The prevalence of success rose from 76% in the first 100 patients to 87% in the last

Comment

This study was designed to analyze a 10-year dual-center experience with 500 patients who underwent TECAB on the AH or BH. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of robotically assisted thoracoscopic coronary operations ever published and the results have significant implications in adopting and establishing minimally invasive techniques in cardiac operations. In this study we show encouraging perioperative results of TECAB in terms of high success rates reaching 80% of the procedures,

References (40)

  • K. Ak et al.

    Totally endoscopic sequential arterial coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart

    Can J Cardiol

    (2007)
  • C. Gao et al.

    Hybrid coronary revascularization by endoscopic robotic coronary artery bypass grafting on beating heart and stent placement

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2009)
  • B. Kiaii et al.

    Simultaneous integrated coronary artery revascularization with long-term angiographic follow-up

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (2008)
  • I. Moussa et al.

    Frequency of early occlusion and stenosis in bypass grafts after minimally invasive direct coronary arterial bypass surgery

    Am J Cardiol

    (2001)
  • P. Healey et al.

    When does the ‘learning curve’ of innovative interventions become questionable practice?

    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg

    (2008)
  • S. Srivastava et al.

    Beating heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2010)
  • D. de Cannière et al.

    Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: multicenter European experience

    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg

    (2007)
  • V. Subramanian et al.

    Robotic assisted multivessel minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with port-access stabilization and cardiac positioning: paving the way for outpatient coronary surgery?

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2005)
  • J.H. Stevens et al.

    Port-access coronary artery bypass with cardioplegic arrest: acute and chronic canine studies

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (1996)
  • M. Argenziano et al.

    Results of the prospective multicenter trial of robotically assisted totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting

    Ann Thorac Surg

    (2006)
  • Cited by (111)

    • Robotic Cardiac Surgery Part II: Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

      2020, Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      The anastomosis in TECAB can be performed with a running suture via the trocars with the patient on bypass and with an arrested heart, or it can be performed off-pump via a distal anastomotic device in the form of a stapler (C-Port; Dextera Surgical Inc, Redwood City, CA) (Fig 1).8,9 TECAB represents a technical challenge but has benefits for patients, including a fast recovery as a result of minimal postoperative pain and the possibility to take down left and right internal thoracic arteries (bilateral internal mammary artery [BIMA]) (both using the robotic instruments from the left side of the patient) to perform 2 or 3 arterial bypasses in different coronary targets and to maximize the use of an arterial conduit with lower risk of wound infection.10,11 The use of BIMA as a conduit has been shown to decrease long-term mortality and may increase overall survival.

    • A new viewpoint on endoscopic CABG: technique description and clinical experience

      2020, Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Third, it is less time-consuming than robotic techniques. Fourth, in contrast to other CABG techniques [9], individual patient selection is unnecessary, making this a suitable technique to treat also patients with increased risk factors such as old age, obesity, and diabetes. Indeed, 30-day mortality in our cohort of octogenarians (5.5%) is strongly reduced compared to the 16.8% mortality after a conventional CABG procedure in octogenarians [26].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text