Original research articleMaintenance of ovulation inhibition with a new progestogen-only pill containing drospirenone after scheduled 24-h delays in pill intake☆,☆☆,☆☆☆
Introduction
The World Health Organization has acknowledged that users of progestogen-only pills (POPs) have little or no increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction or venous thromboembolism [1], [2], [3], [4]. For this reason, more and more physicians prefer to prescribe POPs instead of combined contraceptive preparations. Furthermore, an increasing number of women are overweight and have risks factors for cardiovascular diseases. These women have contraindications for the use of combined hormonal contraceptives but could be offered a POP. Notably, the WHO Medical Eligibility Criteria for POPs do not include any restriction for use of POP in obese women [1].
Traditional POPs inhibit ovulation in only 60–70% of users, so the efficacy of these POPs is dependent on the other mechanisms of action, that is, the effects on cervical mucus penetrability, endometrial receptivity and ciliary activity in the fallopian tubes [5], [6], [7]. The effect on cervical mucus penetrability is short-lasting and greatly diminished by 24 h after tablet intake [5]. Therefore, tablet intake instructions of traditional POPs allow for a delay of maximally 3 h, recommending additional contraceptive measures if the intake delay exceeds 3 h, whereas for combined pills the allowed intake delay is 12 or 24 h. Adhering to such a strict intake regimen requires a high level of discipline of the users, and it is very likely that delays of more than 3 h occur frequently, reducing the contraceptive reliability.
For a more recent POP containing 75-mcg desogestrel (Cerazette®), it has been shown that ovulation inhibition is maintained after three 12-h delays in tablet intake, allowing for more flexibility in the intake regimen [8].
A new-generation oestrogen-free pill has been developed, containing 4-mg drospirenone in a regimen of 24 active treatment days followed by 4 days of placebo treatment. Drospirenone is a progestogen derived from spironolactone, with antimineralocorticoid and antiandrogenic properties [9]. A previous study showed that the drospirenone-only pill effectively inhibited ovulation despite the 4-day treatment-free period [10]. Return of ovulation after stopping treatment occurred at the earliest on day 13 after the last active drospirenone tablet, indicating very efficient ovarian suppression. In this previous study, tablets were taken every 24 h with an allowed variation of maximally 3 h. Because ovarian suppression appeared to be very efficient, it was expected that the same flexibility in tablet intake would be allowed for the drospirenone-only pill as for combined pills, without compromising contraceptive efficacy.
The aim of the present study was accordingly to investigate if ovulation inhibition with the drospirenone-only pill taken for 24 days followed by 4 days of placebo treatment was maintained after four scheduled 24-h delays in tablet intake. The effects of scheduled intake delays in the first and in the second treatment cycle, after a treatment-free period, were compared.
Section snippets
Subjects
The study was performed in a clinical research centre (dinox GmbH, Berlin, Germany) from June 2013 until March 2014. An independent ethics committee reviewed and approved the protocol. All subjects provided written informed consent. The investigators adhered to the principles of Good Clinical Practise and the Declaration of Helsinki.
Healthy female volunteers between 18 and 35 years of age were included. Smokers (maximum of 10 cigarettes per day) were not older than 30 years. Main exclusion
Results
The subject disposition is depicted in Fig. 2. Three subjects in Group A discontinued before starting the study medication; all other subjects were included in the efficacy analysis. Demographic and baseline characteristics of the subjects are listed in Table 1, including the distribution of the subjects across different body weight and body mass index (BMI) categories. The percentage of overweight women (BMI between 25.0 and 30.0 kg/m2) was 26.8%, whereas 4.7% was obese (BMI ≥ 30.0 kg/m2).
Discussion
The results of this study showed the efficacy in inhibiting ovulation of a new POP containing 4-mg drospirenone for 24 days followed by a 4-day treatment-free period. Ovulation inhibition was maintained despite four 24-h delays in tablet intake in one cycle. This effective ovulation suppression is quite remarkable knowing that two delayed-intake days were scheduled shortly before or after the treatment-free period, which is regarded as the most risky period for “escape” ovulations after missing
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Scope International AG for the statistical analysis and their help during the study.
References (19)
- et al.
Risk of idiopathic venous thromboembolism in users of progestogens alone
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Hormonal effects of the 300 μg norethisterone (NET) minipill. 1. Daily steroid levels in 43 subjects during a pretreatment cycle and during the second month of NET administration
Contraception
(1980) - et al.
Maintenance of ovulation inhibition with the 75-μg desogestrel-only contraceptive pill (cerazette®) after scheduled 12-h delays in tablet intake
Contraception
(2005) - et al.
Conception and pharmacodynamic profile of drospirenone
Steroids
(2003) Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use: a WHO family planning cornerstone
(2010)Cardiovascular disease and use of oral and injectable progestogen-only contraceptives and combined injectable contraceptives
Contraception
(1998)- et al.
Oral progestogen-only contraceptives and cardiovascular risk: results from the transnational study on oral contraceptives and the health of young women
Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care
(1999) - et al.
Progestin-only oral contraception: a comprehensive review
Contraception
(1994) - et al.
A comparison of the inhibition of ovulation achieved by desogestrel 75 μg and levonorgestrel 30 μg daily
Hum Reprod
(1999)
Cited by (0)
- ☆
Funding: The study was funded by Exeltis.
- ☆☆
Conflict of interest: D. Drouin is employee of Exeltis France. E.Colli is employee of Exeltis Spain. D. Heger-Mahn and I. Duijkers are directors of Dinox, a contract research organization that received funding from Exeltis to perform the study. S. Skouby is consultant for manufacturers of hormonal products including contraceptives and postmenopausal therapy.
- ☆☆☆
Clinical trial registration number: EudraCT 2013–001,513-33.