Editorial
Inferior vena cava filters in the United States: Less is more

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.08.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Despite the widespread use of Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters, there is no quality evidence to demonstrate their efficacy for routine use, nor there is a consensus on their appropriate indications among major medical societies. The introduction of retrievable filters led to further increase in the utilization of these devices. However, several studies have shown that retrievable filters are rarely retrieved. The implant rates of IVC filters are many folds higher in the United States than in Europe, yet the retrieval rates are much lower. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently issued a safety alert advocating for consideration of filter retrieval when the protection offered by the filter is no longer needed. The controversies surrounding IVC filter placement and retrieval, however, will likely to continue in the absence of good evidence on their efficacy and side effects. Time has come for initiatives to conduct well designed trials based on agreed-upon criteria to settle this debate.

Section snippets

Conflict of interest

The authors report no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (27)

  • Percutaneous thrombectomy of filter-associated inferior vena cava occlusion

    2022, Annals of Vascular Surgery - Brief Reports and Innovations
  • A survey of patients lost to follow-up after inferior vena cava filter placement

    2020, Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    This number has decreased recently at our institution in an attempt to be compliant with current guidelines. Of the approximately 200,000 filters placed annually, Medicare data have previously conveyed retrieval rates between 5% and 15%.15,16 Several single-center studies estimated this number to be closer to 20%.17,18

  • National Trends in Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval Procedures in the Medicare Population Over Two Decades

    2018, Journal of the American College of Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    This trend is likely attributable to ongoing initiatives focusing on appropriate filter utilization. Despite increasing emphasis on the longitudinal follow-up of patients with IVC filters focused on removing filters when no longer clinically warranted [15], we show that retrieval rates remain under 15% among all provider specialty groups. We acknowledge, however, that the retrieval rates we report may not be generalizable more broadly because retrieval may be prioritized less in Medicare beneficiaries than in other populations (eg, younger trauma patients undergoing prophylactic filter placement).

  • Osteodiskitis of Lumbar Spine Due to Migrated Fractured Inferior Vena Cava Filter

    2018, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    Unfortunately, the patient declined undergoing the procedure. The purpose of IVC filter placement is to reduce the mortality risk from symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) in high-risk patients who cannot be anticoagulated.11,12 However, clear guidelines regarding their use are not available yet.1,13,14

View all citing articles on Scopus

Disclosures: None.

View full text