Review
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in human pregnancy: On the way to resolving the controversy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2013.11.007Get rights and content

Summary

There has been an increase in the use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) during pregnancy. However, in the last 10 years, in spite of a vast literature regarding use in pregnancy there seems to be some confusion as to the possible risk of these drugs, especially related to cardiovascular anomalies. In addition, there are data on developmental follow-up studies that raise the question of possible slight developmental and neurobehavioral problems. The purpose of the present review is therefore to critically summarize the current evidence for the risk/benefit analysis of SSRI use in human pregnancy. Although most studies have not shown an increase in the overall risk of major malformations, several have suggested that the use of SSRIs may be associated with a small increased risk for cardiovascular malformations. However, new compelling evidence shows that this apparent increased risk occurs also in women with untreated depression, highlighting the probable ascertainment bias involved in many of these studies. Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) has also been described with an absolute risk of <1%; however, here too, higher rates were described among offspring of women with untreated depression. Poor neonatal adaptation has been described in up to 30% of neonates exposed to SSRIs late in pregnancy. Of the few postnatal developmental follow-up studies, there are no significant developmental problems. The literature on SSRIs in pregnancy is somewhat confusing but when analysing all prospective cohort data there seems to be no demonstrable increase in the rate of major anomalies or developmental disorders. When evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of SSRI treatment in pregnancy, the risk associated with treatment discontinuation – e.g. higher frequency of relapse, increased risk of preterm delivery and postpartum depression – appear to outweigh the potential, unproven risks of treatment. Moreover, maternal depression may negatively affect the child's development, emphasizing the importance of prevention by appropriate treatment during pregnancy with the least minimal effective dose.

Introduction

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of depression, anxiety and other disorders. The prevalence rates of depression during pregnancy have been estimated as 7.4%, 12.8% and 12.0%, for the first, second and third trimesters, respectively, and up to 20% of women may have a depressive episode in the first postpartum year [1], [2]. Indeed, the frequency of the reported use of antidepressants in pregnancy increased from 2.5% in 1998 to >8% in 2006, as reported by the American National Birth Defects Study [2], [3]. One important group of drugs comprises the SSRIs, first introduced for clinical use in the 1980s. They have better tolerability and safety compared with first generation antidepressants, e.g. tricyclic antidepressants, and are safer in overdose exposures. They exert their effects by inhibiting the presynaptic plasma membrane serotonin transporter which mediates the reuptake of serotonin into the presynaptic terminal. Thus, treatment with an SSRI initially blocks reuptake and results in enhanced and prolonged serotonergic neurotransmission due to an increase in synaptic dopamine concentrations [4], [5]. All SSRIs, including those with an additional effect on norepinephrine reuptake (SNRIs), share a similar mechanism of action despite having different chemical structures. SSRI use in pregnancy has increased over the years and in the USA is ∼6% [4], [5]. SSRIs readily cross the human placenta [6], [7] and are also secreted, although in relatively small amounts, in human milk. SSRIs are the most studied antidepressants in pregnancy with >33 000 pregnancies reported in different studies [4]. Nevertheless there are still conflicting views on the risks of these drugs during pregnancy. When judging the use of these drugs in pregnancy one should consider the possible overall effects on the fetus in relation to risks of untreated depression or anxiety for the mother and offspring.

The purpose of the present review is to summarize and evaluate the risk/benefit analysis of SSRI use during human pregnancy, including neonatal effects and neurodevelopmental outcome with special emphasis on prospective cohort studies.

Section snippets

Human studies in pregnancy: Major congenital anomalies and cardiac defects

There are numerous prospective, retrospective and case–control studies on the possible effects of SSRI exposure in pregnancy and in the neonatal period. There seems to be no specific syndrome or any specific type of malformation related to any of the SSRIs. However, a possible association between the use of several SSRIs in pregnancy and cardiac anomalies [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15] as well as a few rare major malformations (neural tube defects, craniosynostosis, omphalocele,

New evidence towards resolution of the controversy

A recent, very large national population-based study from Denmark seems to have largely resolved this controversy [38]. The authors analysed the association between SSRI use and major congenital malformations, with focus on cardiac defects. Importantly, unlike scores of other studies previously mentioned, the authors also identified a group of women with depression who avoided taking their SSRIs in pregnancy. Using the Danish Medical Birth Registry, the authors identified 848 786 pregnancies,

Animal studies

Reproductive and teratogenicity studies with SSRIs were carried out on mice, rats, rabbits, or dogs administered fluoxetine paroxetine or sertraline during organogenesis [39], [40], [41]. These studies did not show an increased risk of teratogenesis even with high doses that caused maternal toxicity, although there was some decrease in neonatal survival and growth [41]. This is in contrast with effects shown in rat and mouse whole embryo cultures [42], [43], [44] or cardiac myocyte cultures [45]

Miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), preterm delivery, and stillbirth

Although most studies reported on the rate of major anomalies following SSRI exposure, other possible pregnancy complications were also presented. There was a slight increase in the miscarriage risk in two meta-analyses [49], [50], [51]. However, in the prospective cohort studies that were reviewed, corrections were not performed for the effect of earlier gestational age at contact – which is an important confounder – and the possible effects of the underlying maternal disease were not

Prematurity and reduced birth weight

In a Finnish study, there was no increase in the rate of preterm delivery, small for gestational age (SGA) or low birth weight [25]. The risk of both low birth weight and preterm delivery was increased in infants who were born to mothers who had received SSRI therapy [27]. Infants exposed to SSRIs had shorter gestations and lower birth weights than non-exposed infants [51]. The increased risk of low birth weight remained significant, even when maternal illness severity was accounted for. The

Neonatal effects

Poor neonatal adaptation syndrome has been described initially following prenatal exposure to various SSRIs, in the third trimester of pregnancy in up to 30% of pregnancies [57], [58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63]. Neonatal withdrawal syndromes associated with SSRIs are characterized by irritability, abnormal crying, tremor, respiratory distress, tachypnoea, jitteriness, lethargy, poor tone or colour and rarely convulsions. Most symptoms are mild and transient. These symptoms are similar to

Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn

Several studies have suggested an association between maternal use of SSRIs late in pregnancy and an increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) [15], [64], [65], [66], [67]. The absolute risk of PPHN was <1%. None of the studies to date described neonatal death from PPHN associated with SSRI. This is different from the 10–15% mortality rate of PPHN from other causes (diaphragmatic hernia, cardiac malformations, aspiration). Other studies, possibly underpowered,

Neurodevelopmental effects

Since SSRIs cross the human placenta [6], [7], they are expected to be able to reach the fetal brain. Indeed, as with other psychotropic drugs, a relatively high percentage of the newborns of SSRI-treated mothers demonstrate some degree of withdrawal symptoms. Hence, it may be expected that intrauterine exposure to SSRIs and other psychotropic drugs might have long-term neurobehavioral and neurodevelopmental consequences. However, since the postnatal environment where the child is raised has a

Possible association with autism spectrum disorders (ASD)

Serotonin has been related to ASD for many years. Elevated levels of serotonin in the platelets in about one-third of children with ASD have been described by many investigators. Since serotonin is an important neurotransmitter involved in fetal brain development, the question whether prenatal exposure to SSRIs is associated with ASD is pertinent [84]. However, there are only a few studies showing such a possible association. In a recent population-based case–control study, a two-fold increased

Risk of treatment discontinuation

When evaluating the risk/benefit ratio of SSRI treatment in pregnancy, the risks associated with treatment discontinuation should also be considered. Abrupt discontinuation of psychotropic drugs in pregnancy may be associated with physical and psychological adverse effects [87]. SSRI treatment discontinuation during pregnancy was also associated with a higher frequency of relapse [88]. Depression is associated with an increased risk for preterm delivery, and the risk of preterm delivery

Conclusions

Clinicians are faced with the difficult risk/benefit consideration of either making a recommendation to treat or not to treat maternal depression or anxiety with SSRIs in pregnancy. In the field of teratology, decisions on new medications during pregnancy often need to be made with insufficient experience on their safety in human pregnancy. In the case of SSRIs in pregnancy, despite extensive available studies on their use, quality is more important than quantity, and data are still not

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Funding sources

None.

References (91)

  • A. Einarson et al.

    Rates of spontaneous and therapeutic abortions following use of antidepressants in pregnancy: results from a large prospective database

    J Obstet Gynaecol Can

    (2009)
  • E.J. Sanz et al.

    Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnant women and neonatal withdrawal syndrome: a database analysis

    Lancet

    (2005)
  • A. Ornoy

    The impact of intrauterine exposure versus postnatal environment in neurodevelopment toxicity: long term neurobehavioral studies in children at risk for developmental disorders

    Toxicol Lett

    (2003)
  • A. Ornoy et al.

    The developmental outcome of children born to heroin dependent mothers, raised at home or adopted

    Child Abuse Negl

    (1996)
  • R.C. Casper et al.

    Follow up of children of depressed mothers exposed or not exposed to antidepressants drugs during pregnancy

    J Pediatr

    (2003)
  • N.I. Gavin et al.

    Perinatal depression; a systematic review of prevalence and incidence

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2005)
  • H.A. Bennett et al.

    Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2004)
  • J. Evans et al.

    Cohort study of depressed mood during pregnancy and after childbirth

    BMJ

    (2001)
  • O. Diav-Citrin et al.

    Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in human pregnancy: to treat or not to treat

    Obstet Gynecol Int

    (2012)
  • W.O. Cooper et al.

    Increasing use of antidepressants in pregnancy

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2007)
  • V. Hendrick et al.

    Placental passage of antidepressant medications

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • J. Rampono et al.

    Placental transfer of SSRI and SNRI antidepressants and effects on the neonate

    Pharmacopsychiatry

    (2009)
  • O. Diav-Citrin et al.

    Paroxetine and fluoxetine in pregnancy: a prospective multicentre, controlled, observational study

    Br J Clin Pharmacol

    (2008)
  • B. Källén et al.

    Maternal use of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors in early pregnancy and infant congenital malformations

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2007)
  • T.F. Oberlander et al.

    Major congenital malformations following prenatal exposure to serotonin reuptake inhibitors and benzodiazepines using population-based health data

    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol

    (2008)
  • L.H. Pedersen et al.

    Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and congenital malformations: population based cohort study

    BMJ

    (2009)
  • P. Merlob et al.

    Are selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors cardiac teratogens? Echocardiographic screening of newborns with persistent heart murmur

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2009)
  • J.B. Kornum et al.

    Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors during early pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations: updated analysis

    Clin Epidemiol

    (2010)
  • M.K. Bakker et al.

    First trimester use of paroxetine and congenital heart defects: a population-based case–control study

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2010)
  • S. Alwan et al.

    Use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy and risk of birth defects

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • C. Louik et al.

    First-trimester use of selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors and risk of birth defects

    N Engl J Med

    (2007)
  • H. Malm et al.

    Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk for major congenital anomalies

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2011)
  • B. Källén et al.

    Antidepressant use during pregnancy: comparison of data obtained from a prescription register and from antenatal care records

    Eur J Clin Pharmacol

    (2011)
  • A. Ericson et al.

    Delivery outcome after the use of antidepressants in early pregnancy

    Eur J Clin Pharmacol

    (1999)
  • C.D. Chambers et al.

    Birth outcomes in pregnant women taking fluoxetine

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • N.A. Kulin et al.

    Pregnancy outcome following maternal use of the new selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a prospective controlled multicenter study

    JAMA

    (1998)
  • H. Malm et al.

    Risks associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pregnancy

    Obstet Gynecol

    (2005)
  • P. Wogelius et al.

    Maternal use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and risk of congenital malformations

    Epidemiology

    (2006)
  • C.L. Wichman et al.

    Congenital heart disease associated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor use during pregnancy

    Mayo Clin Proc

    (2009)
  • N. Byatt et al.

    Freeman MP Antidepressants use in pregnancy: a critical review focused on risks and controversies

    Acta Psychiatr Scand

    (2013)
  • K.E. Wurst et al.

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2010)
  • A. Einarson et al.

    First trimester exposure to paroxetine and prevalence of cardiac defects: meta-analysis of the literature: unfortunately incomplete

    Birth Defects Res Part A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2010)
  • A.R. Scialli

    Paroxetine exposure and during pregnancy and cardiac malformations

    Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol

    (2010)
  • A. Addis et al.

    Safety of fluoxetine during the first trimester of pregnancy; a meta-analytical review of epidemiological studies

    Psychol Med

    (2000)
  • T.R. Einarson et al.

    Newer antidepressants and rates of major malformations; a meta-analysis of prospective comparative studies

    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf

    (2005)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Inhibitory effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine on human Kv1.3 channels

      2021, European Journal of Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often the first choice drug for treatment of psychiatric disorders (Ornoy et al., 2014).

    • Neurobehavioral risks of SSRIs in pregnancy: Comparing human and animal data

      2017, Reproductive Toxicology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Numerous studies have been published assessing their effects on prenatal human development. In spite of some conflicting data, it can be summarized that they do not seem to be a significant human teratogen [8,10]. However, due to the important role serotonin plays in brain development, the question whether SSRIs are a potential neuro-teratogen in human and animals deserves special attention.

    • A prospective-longitudinal study on the association of anxiety disorders prior to pregnancy and pregnancy- and child-related fears

      2016, Journal of Anxiety Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Recent studies suggest that excessive anxiety symptomatology (incl. an unfavorable biological stress response during pregnancy and after delivery) can for example be improved by relaxation techniques and cognitive-behavioral interventions (Bittner et al., 2014; for review see Fink, Urech, Cavelti, & Alder, 2012; Urech et al., 2010). In severe cases, a putative benefit of psychopharmacological treatment may be considered (Ornoy & Koren, 2014). This work is funded by the Institute of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany and supported in part by the Lundbeck Institute Skodsborg, Denmark.

    • Postpartum depression: Etiology, treatment and consequences for maternal care

      2016, Hormones and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      This reluctance may be partly explained by the fact that antidepressants, such as SSRIs, remain active in breast milk and can potentially affect child development (Wisner et al., 1996). Although clinical evidence suggests that low levels of SSRIs enter breast milk (Wisner et al., 1996), maternal antidepressant use remains controversial (Ornoy and Koren, 2014). Maternal antidepressant use may benefit (via therapeutic effect to the mother) or harm (via pharmacological effects in the milk) child development.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text