Skip to main content
Log in

Rate-Control Versus Conversion Strategy in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: Trial Design and Pilot Study Results

  • Published:
Cardiac Electrophysiology Review

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a frequent complication of cardiac surgery. The optimal treatment strategy has not been established. Retrospective studies have suggested that a primary rate-control strategy may be equivalent to a strategy that restores sinus rhythm. Fifty patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to a strategy of antiarrhythmic therapy ± electrical cardioversion or ventricular rate control. Anticoagulation with heparin overlapped with coumadin was administered to both arms. The primary endpoint of the study was time to conversion to sinus rhythm analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The effects of strategy on hospital length of stay was examined as well as the incidence of recurrent AF. This study demonstrated no significant difference between an antiarrhythmic conversion strategy (n = 27) and a rate-control strategy (n = 23) in time to conversion to sinus rhythm (11.2 ± 3.2 vs. 11.8 ± 3.9 hours; p = 0.8). With Cox multivariate analysis to control for the effects of age, sex, beta-blocker usage, and type of surgery, the conversion strategy showed a trend toward reducing the time from treatment to restoration of sinus rhythm (p = 0.08). The length of hospital stay was reduced in the antiarrhythmic arm compared with the rate-control strategy (9.0 ± 0.7 vs. 13.2 ± 2.0 days; p = 0.05). In hospital relapse rates in the antiarrhythmic arm were 30% compared with 57% in the rate-control strategy (p = 0.24). At the termination of the study, 91% of the patients in the rate-control arm were in sinus rhythm compared with 96% in the antiarrhythmic arm. In conclusion, this pilot study shows little difference between a rate-control strategy and a strategy to restore/maintain sinus rhythm. Regardless of the strategy, majority of patients will be in sinus rhythm after two months. A larger randomized, controlled study is needed to assess the impact of restoration of sinus rhythm on length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ommen SR, Odell JA, Stanton MS. Atrial arrhythmias after cardiothoracic surgery. N Engl J Med 1997;336:1429–1434 (Erratum in N Engl J Med 1997;337:209).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M, Collins JJ, Cohn LH, Burstin HR. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Circulation 1996;94:390–397.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Matthew JP, Parks R, Savino JS. Atrial fibrillation following coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Predictors, outcomes and resource utilization. JAMA 1996;276:300–306.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cresswell LL, Schessler RB, Rosenbloom M. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg 1993;56:539–549.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kim MH, McHale RW, Bruckman D, Russman P, Morady F. Oral amiodarone prophylaxis and a clinical pathway approach to atrial fibrillation following primary coronary artery bypass graft surgery: Prelimary results of phase II of the Postoperative atrial fibrillation in cardiac surgery study (PACS2) J AmColl Cardiol 2000;35(suppl. A):558A.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kowey PR, Taylor JE, Marinchak RA. Preventing supraventricular arrhythmia after CABG surgery. Choices Cardiol 1993;7:298–300.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Andrews TC, Reimold SC, Berlin JA, Antman EM. Prevention of supraventricular arrhythmias after cornary artery bypass surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials. Circulation 1991;84(suppl. III):III236–III244.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Connolly SJ, Cybulsky I, Lamy A, Roberts RS, O'brien B, Carroll S, Crystal E, Thorpe KE, Gent M. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of prophylactic metoprolol for reduction of hospital length of stay after heart surgery: The Beta-Blocker Length of Stay (BLOS) study. Am heart J 2003;145(2):226–232.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Daoud EG, Strickberger SA, Man KC, Goyal R, Deeb GM, Bolling SF, Pagani FD, Bitar C, Meissner M, Morady F. Preoperative amiodarone as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery. NEngl JMed 1997;337:1785–1791.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guarnieri T, Nolan S, Gottlieb SO, Dudek A, Lowry DR. Intravenous amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery: The Amiodarone Reduction in Coronary Heart trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:343–347.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Redle JD, Khurana S, Marzan R, McCullough PA, Stewart JR, Westveer DC, O'Neill WW, Bassett JS, Tepe NA, Frumin HI. Prophylactic oral amiodarone compared with placebo for prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J 1999;138:144–150.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Suttorp MJ, Kingma JH, Peels HO, Koomen EM, Tijssen JG, van Hemel NM, Defauw JA, Ernst SM. Effectiveness of sotalol in preventing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias shortly after coronary artery bypass grafting. AmJ Cardiol 1991;68:1163–1169.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Parikka H, Toivonen L, Heikkila L, Virtanen K, Jarvinen A. Comparison of sotalol and metoprolol in the prevention of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 1998;31:67–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gomes JA, Ip J, Santoni-Rugiu F, Mehta D, Ergin A, Lansman S. Oral d,l sotalol reduces the incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. J AmColl Cardiol 1999;34:334–339.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bloommaert D, Gonzalez M, Mucumbitsi J, Gurné O, Evrard P, Buche M, Louagie MD, Eucher P, Jamart J, Installé E, De Roy L. Effective prevention of atrial fibrillation by continuous atrial overdive pacing after coronary artery bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:1411–1415.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Daoud EG, Dabir R, Archambeau M, Morady F, Strickberger SA. Randomized, double-blind trial of simultaneous right and left atrial epicardial pacing for prevention of post-open heart surgery atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2000;102:761–765.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fan K, Lee KL, Chiu CSW, Lee JW, He GW, Cheing D, Sun MP, Lau CP. Effects of biatrial pacing in prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 2000;102:755–760.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crystal E, Connolly SJ, Sleik K, Ginger TJ, Yusuf S. Interventions on prevention of postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing heart surgery: A meta-analysis. Circulation 2002;107:75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Daoud EG, Snow R, Hummel JD, Kalbfleisch ST, Weiss R, Augostini R. Temporary atrial epicardial pacing as prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after heart surgery: A meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2003;14:127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Myers MG, Alnemri K. Rate control therapy for atrial fibrillation following cornary artery bypass surgery. Can J Cardiol 1998;14:1363–1366.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Solomon AJ, Kouretas PC, Hopkins RA et al. Early discharge of patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation after cardiovascular surgery. Am Heart J 1998;135:557–563.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wyse DG, Waldo AL, DiMarco JP, Domanski MJ, Domanski Y, Rosenberg EB, Schron JC, Kellen HL, Greene MC, Mickel JE Dalquist, Corley SD. A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1825–1833.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JK, Klein GJ, Krahn AD, Yee R, Zarnke K, Simpson C, Skanes A, Spindler B. Rate-control versus conversion strategy in postoperative atrial fibrillation: A prospective, randomized pilot study. Am Heart J 2000;140:871–877.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalman JM, Munawar M, Howes LG, Louis WJ, Buxton BF, Gutteridge G. Atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting is associated with sympathetic activation. Ann Thorac Surg 1995;60:1709–1715.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hogue CW, Domitrovich PP, Stein PK. RR interval dynamics before atrial fibrillation in patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1998;98:429–434.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lahey SJ, Campos CT, Jennings B. Hospital readmission after carciac surgery: Does “fast track” cardiac surgery result in cost saving or cost shifting? Circulation 1998;98(suppl. II):II-35–40.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Danias PG, Caulfield TA, Weigner MJ. Likelihood of spontaneous conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. J AmColl Cardiol 1998;31:533–592.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Cochrane AO, Siddins M, Rosenfeldt R. A comparison of amiodarone and digoxin for treatment of supraventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1994;8:194–198.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hjelms E. Procainamide conversion of acute AF after openheart surgery compared with digoxin treatment. Scan J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1992;26:193–196.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McAlister HF, Luke RA, Whitlock RM, Smith WM. Intravenous amiodarone bolus versus oral quinidine for atrial flutter and fibrillation after cardiac operations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;99:911–918.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Geelen P, O'Hara GE, Roy N, Talajic M, Roy D, Plante S, Turgeon J. Comparison of propafenone versus procainamide for the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:345–347.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Soucier R, Silverman D, Abordo M, Jaagosild P, Abiose A, Madhusoodanan KP, Therrien M, Lippman N, Dalamagas H, Berns E. Propafenone versus ibultilide for postoperative atrial fibrillation following cardiac surgery: Neither strategy improves outcomes compared to rate control alone. Med Sci Monit 2003;9(3): PI19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Tisdale JE, Padhi ID, Goldberg AD. A randomized doubleblind comparison of intravenous diltiazem and digoxin for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J 1998;135:739–747.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, J.K., Klein, G.J., Krahn, A.D. et al. Rate-Control Versus Conversion Strategy in Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation: Trial Design and Pilot Study Results. Card Electrophysiol Rev 7, 178–184 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027428003609

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027428003609

Navigation