Elsevier

Genetics in Medicine

Volume 17, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 226-233
Genetics in Medicine

Original Research Article
Informed consent for biobanking: consensus-based guidelines for adequate comprehension

https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2014.102Get rights and content
Under an Elsevier user license
open archive

Abstract

Purpose

Federal regulations and best practice guidelines identify categories of information that should be communicated to prospective biobank participants during the informed consent process. However, uncertainty remains about which of this information participants must understand to provide valid consent.

Methods

We conducted a Delphi process to define “adequate comprehension” in the context of biobanking consent. The process involved an iterative series of three online surveys of a diverse panel of 51 experts, including genome scientists, biobank managers, ethics and policy experts, and community and participant representatives. We sought consensus (>70% agreement) concerning what specific details participants should know about 16 biobank consent topics.

Results

Consensus was achieved for 15 of the 16 consent topics. The exception was the comprehension needed regarding the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act.

Conclusion

Our Delphi process was successful in identifying a concise set of key points that prospective participants must grasp to provide valid consent for biobanking. Specifying the level of knowledge sufficient for individuals to make an informed choice provides a basis for improving consent forms and processes, as well as an absolute metric for assessing the effectiveness of other interventions to improve comprehension.

Keywords

biobanking
comprehension
Delphi process
informed consent
research ethics

Cited by (0)