Skip to main content
Download PDF

Hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with or without cirrhosis: a population-based study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 21, Article number: 394 (2021) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

There are limited data regarding the factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients without cirrhosis. We sought to determine the prevalence and factors associated with HCC in NAFLD patients with or without cirrhosis.

Methods

Adults with NAFLD (June 2015 to May 2020) were identified using the electronic health record database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH) from 26 major integrated US healthcare systems. The prevalence of HCC was calculated. Multivariable analyses adjusting for covariates were performed to evaluate the associated risk factors and the presence of HCC.

Results

A total of 392,800 NAFLD patients were identified. Among 1110 patients with HCC, 170 (15.3%) had no cirrhosis. The prevalence of HCC in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic NAFLD patients was 4.6/10,000 persons (95% CI 3.9–5.3), and 374.4/10,000 persons (95% CI 350.9–398.8), respectively. Age > 65 years (adjusted OR; 3.37, 95% CI 2.47–4.59), ever had elevated alanine aminotransferase (2.69; 2.14–3.37), male gender (2.57; 1.88–3.49), smoker (1.75; 1.23–2.49), and diabetes (1.56; 1.15–2.11) were associated with HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD (all P < 0.05). The prevalence of HCC in the non-cirrhotic with all five risk factors was 45.5/10,000 persons (95% CI 17.4–73.6). The factors associated with HCC in cirrhotic NAFLD included clinical decompensation, age > 65 years, male gender, Hispanic race, elevated alanine aminotransferase, diabetes and smoker (all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

These data identified the major risk factors for the development of HCC in NAFLD patients. In the non-cirrhotics, older male patients with smoking history, diabetes and an elevated alanine aminotransferase had highest risk and may need increased judicious monitoring.

Peer Review reports

Background

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common complex, metabolic disease with an increasing incidence pari passu with the increase in obesity and diabetes worldwide [1]. An important liver-related complication in NAFLD is the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In the United States, NAFLD became the second most common etiology of HCC in waitlisted liver transplant candidates in 2017 [2].

The development of HCC occurs in both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients with NAFLD. Liver tumorigenesis in NAFLD is unique as it is related to interacting mechanisms including environmental factors, oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and the immune response [3]. In the NAFLD population, there is significant higher proportion of HCC in non-cirrhotic to cirrhotic liver compared to other etiologies of liver diseases [4]. Previous data suggest that HCC occurrence in non-cirrhotic livers accounts for 20 to over 50% of all NAFLD-associated HCC cases [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD had a higher risk of HCC compared to the general population [10]. Despite the increased risk of HCC development in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients, the risk was less than that in cirrhotics and did not exceed the annual incidence threshold for surveillance [10, 13]. Therefore, the current HCC screening recommendation is only offered to patients with cirrhosis [14] that can explain the larger tumor size in patients without cirrhosis than that in patients with cirrhosis [11, 15]. There are limited data in NAFLD patients without cirrhosis regarding the risk factors that alter the risk of HCC. This study was performed to estimate the prevalence of HCC in NAFLD patients with or without cirrhosis in the United States and to identify the factors associated with the presence of HCC in these patients, using a large electronic health record (EHR) database. Patient demographics and laboratory values were analyzed as potential risk factors that affect the prevalence of HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients.

Methods

A commercial database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH), which includes EHR data from 26 major integrated US healthcare systems, was used for this study. The participating health care systems are distributed across all 50 states of the United States. The database uses de-identified inpatient and outpatient data from each participating health care organization. The data were collected from a variety of health information systems, including EHR, billing inquiries, and lab systems. The de-identified data are then standardized and normalized and are compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) [16].

Explorys database categorizes the diagnoses, laboratory findings, and procedures by the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) hierarchy, and the prescription drug orders are categorized by SNOMED terms for the pharmacologic class or RxNorm for each drug. SNOMED-CT is a comprehensive hierarchical code set, which provides more detailed information of a disease than ICD-10 code. It has been widely used in EHR for clinical data capture, storage, and research. The data are presented in number and proportion for each diagnosis, findings, procedures, and prescription drug. The database rounds cell counts to the nearest 10 for the identity protection of patients. It should be noted that all cell counts of less than five were treated as zero in this database.

Study populations

We identified a cohort of adults 18 years of age or older with NAFLD from June 2015 to May 2020. NAFLD patients included were those who had diagnoses based on SNOMED-CT of “nonalcoholic liver disease”, which is use as a synonyms for “fatty metamorphosis of the liver”, or “nonalcoholic steatohepatitis”. Patients with the diagnosis of “chronic viral hepatitis” and/or “autoimmune hepatitis” and/or “hemochromatosis” and/or “disorder caused by alcohol” were excluded. Cirrhosis patients were defined as those ever having a diagnosis of “cirrhosis” and/or “esophageal varices”, and HCC patients were defined as those having a diagnosis of “liver cell carcinoma” without the diagnosis of “secondary malignant neoplasm of the liver” and “bile duct neoplasm”.

Data collection

Patient demographic data and associated variables of interest were identified using relevant SNOMED-CT. The variables included age, gender, race, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, smoking status, obesity, morbid obesity, and elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Clinical decompensation were identified in patients with cirrhosis, including the patients who had variceal bleeding, elevated bilirubin, hepatic encephalopathy or ascites. Medication data were identified by using SNOMED or RxNorm.

Statistical analysis

Patient demographic data were presented as numbers and proportions. Differences between groups of NAFLD patients with or without cirrhosis were tested using a chi-square test, or fisher exact test as appropriate. The prevalence of HCC in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic NAFLD patients over the 5-year period was calculated. The prevalence in each subgroup was calculated by identifying patients with HCC in the subgroups of interest as a proportion of the total number of the patients at risk. The Wald method was used for the calculation of confidence intervals. To adjust for covariates, multiple searches were performed to account for every probability. Multivariable model adjusting for age, gender, and white race were performed to evaluate the associated factors and the presence of HCC in NAFLD patients with or without cirrhosis. Adjusted odds ratio (adjusted OR) and 95% confidence intervals were estimated for these associations. Stata version 15.1 (Stata Corp LCC, Texas) software was used, and a 2-sided P value to < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all the analysis.

Results

Of the 72,563,480 individuals in the database from June 2015 to May 2020, we identified 392,800 adult patients with NAFLD. There were 25,110 patients (6.4%) with cirrhosis and 367,690 patients (93.6%) without cirrhosis.

In non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients, 58.3% were female, 34.3% were over 65 years of age, and 82.6% were Caucasian (Table 1). In the cirrhotic patients, 62.6% were female, 55.2% were over 65 years of age, and 87.3% were Caucasian. There was a higher proportion of cirrhotic patients compared to those without cirrhosis who had elevated ALT (52.8% vs. 45.4%), and a smoking history (21.1% vs. 14.9%). As expected, obesity and diabetes were more common in the cirrhotic than non-cirrhotic patients. In cirrhotic patients, 58.5% had clinical decompensation; 6.3% had variceal bleeding, 15.3% had hepatic encephalopathy, 29.6% had ascites, and 40.3% had elevated bilirubin.

Table 1 Demographic data and clinical characteristics of patients with non-cirrhotic NAFLD and cirrhotic NAFLD
Full size table

Of the 1110 HCC found in NAFLD patients, 15% occurred in non-cirrhotics. The prevalence of HCC in non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic NAFLD patients was 4.6/10,000 persons (95% CI 3.9–5.3/10,000 persons), and 374.4/10,000 persons (95% CI 350.9–397.8/10,000 persons), respectively (Fig. 1). The characteristics of HCC patients stratified by cirrhosis and no cirrhosis is shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Prevalence (per 10,000 patients) of HCC among subgroups of patients with NAFLD

Full size image
Table 2 Demographic data and clinical characteristics of patients with HCC
Full size table

Factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in non-cirrhotic NAFLD

HCC was diagnosed in 170 patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis with a prevalence of 4.6/10,000 persons within a 5-year period. As shown in Table 3, in multivariable analyses, age > 65 years (adjusted OR 3.37; 95% CI 2.47–4.59), elevated ALT (adjusted OR 2.69; 95% CI 2.14–3.37), male gender (adjusted OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.88–3.49), a smoking history (adjusted OR 1.75; 95% CI 1.23–2.49), and diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.15–2.11) were significant factors associated with HCC. The prevalence of HCC was 45.5/10,000 persons (95% CI 17.4–73.6/10,000 persons) in patients with all five risk factors (Fig. 1). When insulin use is added to the above five risk factors, the risk of developing HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD increases to 69.44/10,000 persons (95% CI 26.55–112.34/10,000 persons).

Table 3 Multivariable analysis of the factors associated with HCC prevalence in non-cirrhotic NAFLD
Full size table

Factors associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic NAFLD

HCC was diagnosed in 940 cirrhotic NAFLD patients with the prevalence of 374.4/10,000 persons within a 5-year period. In multivariable analyses (Table 4), decompensated liver (adjusted OR 2.78; 95% CI 2.44–3.17), age > 65 years (adjusted OR 2.35; 95% CI 2.05–2.70), male gender (adjusted OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.98–2.53), elevated ALT (adjusted OR 1.97; 95% CI 1.74–2.24), Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.39–1.99), diagnosed with diabetes (adjusted OR 1.27; 95% CI 1.10–1.46), and a smoking history (adjusted OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05–1.38) were associated with HCC. Patients who were Caucasian, African–Americans or had hyperlipidemia were less likely to have HCC (adjusted OR 0.79; 95% CI 0.66–0.94, 0.40; 95% CI 0.26–0.61, and 0.68; 95% CI 0.60–0.77 respectively).

Table 4 Multivariable analysis of the factors associated with HCC prevalence in cirrhotic NAFLD
Full size table

Discussion

There are three major findings in this study. First and not surprisingly, cirrhosis is the major risk factor for the development of HCC in NAFLD patients. Second, although the risk of HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD is low overall, there is increased risk for HCC in the subgroup of male patients over 65 with a history of smoking, an elevated ALT, and diabetes mellitus. In non-cirrhotics with all five of these risk factors, there is a 9.9-fold increased risk for developing HCC compared to overall prevalence in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients. Third, ethnicity may have a significant impact on the risk of HCC development in NAFLD population.

Cirrhosis is well-known to be a major risk factor for the development of HCC in all etiologies of liver diseases [17]. Our study confirmed that the presence of liver cirrhosis is the most potent risk factor for HCC in NAFLD patients. The ratio of HCC prevalence in the cirrhotic/non-cirrhotic in NAFLD patients was 81-fold. The proportion of HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients to HCC in all NAFLD was 15.3%, in our study, which is slightly lower than previously reported (20–63%) [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. However, the proportion of non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients with HCC varied widely between studies and may be due to studies reported from tertiary centers and the disproportionate contribution of non-cirrhotic patients with HCC who undergo surgical resection.

Of the risk factors identified, age > 65 years was the highest risk factor for HCC development in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients and was similar to reports by others [18]. Our observations of a higher association of HCC with male gender was also consistent with previous study [19]. The gender disparity might be explained by differences in hormonal functions, in which estrogen might be protective against HCC development [20] and the effect of sex hormones on visceral fat [21] Diabetes mellitus [22, 23] and smoking history [24, 25] are known risk factors for HCC as was observed in our cohort. Prior data on the predictive value of ALT levels for long-term liver-related outcomes in NAFLD remain limited. However, elevated ALT suggests histologic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis [26, 27] with fibrosis [27]. A study, using a hepatoprotectant as a surrogate marker of elevated ALT demonstrated a significant risk for the development of HCC in non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients [18]. It is important that future research investigate the correlation between elevated transaminases and the risk of HCC.

In the current study, clinical decompensation in cirrhotic patients was associated with a higher risk of HCC, while patients with hyperlipidemia had a lower risk of HCC. It is clear that more advanced liver disease had a higher risk of clinical decompensation and liver related complications. The protective effect of hyperlipidemia against the development of HCC could be related to better liver function or the likelihood that these patients were more likely to be on a statin.

The racial differences reported in the prevalence of NAFLD [28] may explain, in part, the variation in risk of HCC development in NAFLD patients in the present study and prior reports [10]. Our observation in this large cohort of NAFLD patients shows that a lower risk of HCC in cirrhotic African Americans and both cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic non-Hispanic whites, compared with Hispanics with cirrhosis. However, it is possible that ethnicity, health behavior, and socioeconomic status are correlated and prospective studies in large cohorts are required to dissect the contribution of ethnicity to the risk of HCC in NAFLD.

Despite the increasing risk of HCC observed in obese patients in the general population [29] and other chronic liver diseases [30, 31], obesity and morbid obesity were not independently associated with HCC in NAFLD patients in our study and was consistent with the data reported from a previous longitudinal study [10]. One potential explanation may be the association of obesity with both NAFLD and HCC.

Limitations of our study include the potential for the same patient to be included more than once despite Explorys using a robust patient matching algorithm to match the same patient across different participating healthcare institutions and combining the data. Some information could not be obtained from the database as all the data was de-identified and categorized. Therefore, manual individual chart review, an analysis of continuous variables, and the sensitivity analysis cannot be performed when using this database. Whether HCC was newly diagnosed or recurrence was unknown. Several variables associated with the development of HCC in NAFLD, for example, gene polymorphisms, and the NAFLD treatment, especially non-pharmacological treatment, were not available and these factors should be further investigated. The aforementioned limitation of this database precluded the investigator to retrieve the liver biopsy data and the method of HCC diagnosis. Hence, there was a potential risk that within the group classed as non-cirrhotics, there could be patients with asymptomatic cirrhosis which has not been reported. However, these limitations are overcome by the major strength of our study of the analysis of a large population-based data set that included both inpatients and outpatients from a large cross section in the United States and that our study provide hypothesis-generating for the future research. The utilization of basic clinical data to identify the non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients who have a high risk for HCC development in our study will help clinical practice and the design of future studies.

Conclusions

Cirrhosis in NAFLD patients poses the most significant risk for HCC occurrence. Among non-cirrhotic NAFLD patients, male patients, over 65 years old, with diabetes mellitus and a history of smoking with an elevated ALT were associated with the greatest risk of HCC. These patients could benefit from the offer of HCC surveillance and prospective study is warranted to further confirm these findings.

Availability of data and materials

The data that support the findings of this study are available from a commercial database (Explorys Inc, Cleveland, OH) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for the current study, and so are not publicly available.

Abbreviations

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HER:

Electronic health record

HIPAA:

Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

OR:

Odds ratio

SNOMED-CT:

Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms

References

  1. Allen AM, Therneau TM, Larson JJ, Coward A, Somers VK, Kamath PS. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease incidence and impact on metabolic burden and death: a 20 year-community study. Hepatology. 2018;67(5):1726–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Ong JP, Jacobson IM, Bugianesi E, Duseja A, Eguchi Y, Wong VW, Negro F, Yilmaz Y, et al. Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is the fastest growing cause of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver transplant candidates. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(4):748-755.e743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anstee QM, Reeves HL, Kotsiliti E, Govaere O, Heikenwalder M. From NASH to HCC: current concepts and future challenges. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;16(7):411–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stine JG, Wentworth BJ, Zimmet A, Rinella ME, Loomba R, Caldwell SH, Argo CK. Systematic review with meta-analysis: risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis without cirrhosis compared to other liver diseases. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2018;48(7):696–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Piscaglia F, Svegliati-Baroni G, Barchetti A, Pecorelli A, Marinelli S, Tiribelli C, Bellentani S. Group H-NIS: clinical patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a multicenter prospective study. Hepatology. 2016;63(3):827–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ertle J, Dechene A, Sowa JP, Penndorf V, Herzer K, Kaiser G, Schlaak JF, Gerken G, Syn WK, Canbay A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progresses to hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of apparent cirrhosis. Int J Cancer. 2011;128(10):2436–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Yasui K, Hashimoto E, Komorizono Y, Koike K, Arii S, Imai Y, Shima T, Kanbara Y, Saibara T, Mori T, et al. Characteristics of patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis who develop hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9(5):428–33 (quiz e450).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mohamad B, Shah V, Onyshchenko M, Elshamy M, Aucejo F, Lopez R, Hanouneh IA, Alhaddad R, Alkhouri N. Characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients without cirrhosis. Hepatol Int. 2016;10(4):632–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mittal S, El-Serag HB, Sada YH, Kanwal F, Duan Z, Temple S, May SB, Kramer JR, Richardson PA, Davila JA. Hepatocellular carcinoma in the absence of cirrhosis in united states veterans is associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;14(1):124-131.e121.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kanwal F, Kramer JR, Mapakshi S, Natarajan Y, Chayanupatkul M, Richardson PA, Li L, Desiderio R, Thrift AP, Asch SM, et al. Risk of hepatocellular cancer in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2018;155(6):1828-1837.e1822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bengtsson B, Stal P, Wahlin S, Bjorkstrom NK, Hagstrom H. Characteristics and outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with NAFLD without cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2019;39(6):1098–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pais R, Fartoux L, Goumard C, Scatton O, Wendum D, Rosmorduc O, Ratziu V. Temporal trends, clinical patterns and outcomes of NAFLD-related HCC in patients undergoing liver resection over a 20-year period. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;46(9):856–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawamura Y, Arase Y, Ikeda K, Seko Y, Imai N, Hosaka T, Kobayashi M, Saitoh S, Sezaki H, Akuta N, et al. Large-scale long-term follow-up study of Japanese patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease for the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107(2):253–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Charlton M, Cusi K, Rinella M, Harrison SA, Brunt EM, Sanyal AJ. The diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guidance from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2018;67(1):328–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kodama K, Kawaguchi T, Hyogo H, Nakajima T, Ono M, Seike M, Takahashi H, Nozaki Y, Kawanaka M, Tanaka S, et al. Clinical features of hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease patients without advanced fibrosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;34(9):1626–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaelber DC, Foster W, Gilder J, Love TE, Jain AK. Patient characteristics associated with venous thromboembolic events: a cohort study using pooled electronic health record data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19(6):965–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tarao K, Nozaki A, Ikeda T, Sato A, Komatsu H, Komatsu T, Taguri M, Tanaka K. Real impact of liver cirrhosis on the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in various liver diseases-meta-analytic assessment. Cancer Med. 2019;8(3):1054–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee TY, Wu JC, Yu SH, Lin JT, Wu MS, Wu CY. The occurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma in different risk stratifications of clinically noncirrhotic nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(7):1307–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yao KF, Ma M, Ding GY, Li ZM, Chen HL, Han B, Chen Q, Jiang XQ, Wang LS. Meta-analysis reveals gender difference in the association of liver cancer incidence and excess BMI. Oncotarget. 2017;8(42):72959–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang W, Lu Y, Xu Y, Xu L, Zheng W, Wu Y, Li L, Shen P. Estrogen represses hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) growth via inhibiting alternative activation of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). J Biol Chem. 2012;287(48):40140–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cheung OK, Cheng AS. Gender differences in adipocyte metabolism and liver cancer progression. Front Genet. 2016;7:168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Alexander M, Loomis AK, van der Lei J, Duarte-Salles T, Prieto-Alhambra D, Ansell D, Pasqua A, Lapi F, Rijnbeek P, Mosseveld M, et al. Risks and clinical predictors of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma diagnoses in adults with diagnosed NAFLD: real-world study of 18 million patients in four European cohorts. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang C, Wang X, Gong G, Ben Q, Qiu W, Chen Y, Li G, Wang L. Increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(7):1639–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrick JL, Campbell PT, Koshiol J, Thistle JE, Andreotti G, Beane-Freeman LE, Buring JE, Chan AT, Chong DQ, Doody MM, et al. Tobacco, alcohol use and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the Liver Cancer Pooling Project. Br J Cancer. 2018;118(7):1005–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdel-Rahman O, Helbling D, Schob O, Eltobgy M, Mohamed H, Schmidt J, Giryes A, Mehrabi A, Iype S, John H, et al. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for the development of and mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated systematic review of 81 epidemiological studies. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10(4):245–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Verma S, Jensen D, Hart J, Mohanty SR. Predictive value of ALT levels for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and advanced fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Liver Int. 2013;33(9):1398–405.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Ballestri S, Nascimbeni F, Romagnoli D, Lonardo A. The independent predictors of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and its individual histological features: insulin resistance, serum uric acid, metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and serum total cholesterol are a clue to pathogenesis and candidate targets for treatment. Hepatol Res. 2016;46(11):1074–87.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Rich NE, Oji S, Mufti AR, Browning JD, Parikh ND, Odewole M, Mayo H, Singal AG. Racial and ethnic disparities in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease prevalence, severity, and outcomes in the United States: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;16(2):198-210.e192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Welzel TM, Graubard BI, Zeuzem S, El-Serag HB, Davila JA, McGlynn KA. Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of primary liver cancer in the United States: a study in the SEER-Medicare database. Hepatology. 2011;54(2):463–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ohki T, Tateishi R, Sato T, Masuzaki R, Imamura J, Goto T, Yamashiki N, Yoshida H, Kanai F, Kato N, et al. Obesity is an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma development in chronic hepatitis C patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6(4):459–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen CL, Yang HI, Yang WS, Liu CJ, Chen PJ, You SL, Wang LY, Sun CA, Lu SN, Chen DS, et al. Metabolic factors and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma by chronic hepatitis B/C infection: a follow-up study in Taiwan. Gastroenterology. 2008;135(1):111–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Supported in part by RO1 GM119174 (SD); RO1 DK113196 (SD); P50 AA024333 (AJM, SD); UO1 AA 021890 (AJM, SD); UO1 DK 061732 (AJM, SD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease and Surgery Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish, Mohannad Abou Saleh, Srinivasan Dasarathy & Arthur McCullough

  2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

    Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    George Khoudari

  4. Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, 110 Inthawarorot Rd., Sriphum, Muang, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand

    Chaisiri Angkurawaranon & Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish

  5. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Emad Mansoor

  6. Department of Inflammation and Immunity, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA

    Srinivasan Dasarathy & Arthur McCullough

Authors
  1. Kanokwan Pinyopornpanish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. George Khoudari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohannad Abou Saleh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Chaisiri Angkurawaranon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Emad Mansoor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Srinivasan Dasarathy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Arthur McCullough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

KWP, AM, EM, MA, and KPP were involved in the study conception and the design. KWP and EM were involved in the acquisition of the data. KWP, GK, and CA analyzed and interpretated the data. KWP, KPP, and GK drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanokporn Pinyopornpanish.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics and consent were not required as it was a secondary analysis of an anonymizes dataset. All methods were carried out in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pinyopornpanish, K., Khoudari, G., Saleh, M.A. et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with or without cirrhosis: a population-based study. BMC Gastroenterol 21, 394 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01978-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-021-01978-0

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us