Background: Frequency of enterococcal bloodstream infection (E-BSI) is increasing, and the number of episodes complicated by infective endocarditis (IE) varies. Performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in all patients with E-BSI is costly and time-consuming. Our objectives were to identify patients with E-BSI who are at very low risk of enterococcal IE (and therefore do not require TEE) and to compare the outcome of E-BSI in patients with/without IE.
Methods: Between September 2003 and October 2012, we performed a prospective cohort study (all patients with E-BSI) and a case-control study (patients with/without enterococcal IE) in our center.
Results: We detected 1515 patients with E-BSI and 65 with enterococcal IE (4.29% of all episodes of E-BSI, 16.7% of patients with E-BSI who underwent transthoracic echocardiography, and 35.5% of all patients with E-BSI who underwent TEE). We developed a bedside predictive score for enterococcal IE-Number of positive blood cultures, Origin of the bacteremia, previous Valve disease, Auscultation of heart murmur (NOVA) score-based on the following variables: Number of positive blood cultures (3/3 blood cultures or the majority if more than 3), 5 points; unknown Origin of bacteremia, 4 points; prior heart Valve disease, 2 points; Auscultation of a heart murmur, 1 point (receiver operating characteristic = 0.83). The best cutoff corresponded to a score ≥4 (sensitivity, 100%; specificity, 29%). A score <4 points suggested a very low risk for enterococcal IE and that TEE could be obviated.
Conclusions: Enterococcal IE may be more frequent than generally thought. Depending on local prevalence of endocarditis, application of the NOVA score may safely obviate echocardiography in 14%-27% of patients with E-BSI.
Keywords: Enterococcus spp.; bacteremia; endocarditis.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.