Aspirin in Patients With Previous Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Ann Intern Med. 2018 Feb 20;168(4):237-244. doi: 10.7326/M17-2341. Epub 2017 Nov 14.

Abstract

Background: Uncertainty remains about the effects of aspirin in patients with prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) having noncardiac surgery.

Objective: To evaluate benefits and harms of perioperative aspirin in patients with prior PCI.

Design: Nonprespecified subgroup analysis of a multicenter factorial trial. Computerized Internet randomization was done between 2010 and 2013. Patients, clinicians, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were blinded to treatment assignment. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01082874).

Setting: 135 centers in 23 countries.

Patients: Adults aged 45 years or older who had or were at risk for atherosclerotic disease and were having noncardiac surgery. Exclusions were placement of a bare-metal stent within 6 weeks, placement of a drug-eluting stent within 1 year, or receipt of nonstudy aspirin within 72 hours before surgery.

Intervention: Aspirin therapy (overall trial, n = 4998; subgroup, n = 234) or placebo (overall trial, n = 5012; subgroup, n = 236) initiated within 4 hours before surgery and continued throughout the perioperative period. Of the 470 subgroup patients, 99.9% completed follow-up.

Measurements: The 30-day primary outcome was death or nonfatal myocardial infarction; bleeding was a secondary outcome.

Results: In patients with prior PCI, aspirin reduced the risk for the primary outcome (absolute risk reduction, 5.5% [95% CI, 0.4% to 10.5%]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.50 [CI, 0.26 to 0.95]; P for interaction = 0.036) and for myocardial infarction (absolute risk reduction, 5.9% [CI, 1.0% to 10.8%]; HR, 0.44 [CI, 0.22 to 0.87]; P for interaction = 0.021). The effect on the composite of major and life-threatening bleeding in patients with prior PCI was uncertain (absolute risk increase, 1.3% [CI, -2.6% to 5.2%]). In the overall population, aspirin increased the risk for major bleeding (absolute risk increase, 0.8% [CI, 0.1% to 1.6%]; HR, 1.22 [CI, 1.01 to 1.48]; P for interaction = 0.50).

Limitation: Nonprespecified subgroup analysis with small sample.

Conclusion: Perioperative aspirin may be more likely to benefit rather than harm patients with prior PCI.

Primary funding source: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Antihypertensive Agents / therapeutic use
  • Aspirin / adverse effects
  • Aspirin / therapeutic use*
  • Biomarkers / blood
  • Clonidine / therapeutic use
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / chemically induced
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction / prevention & control
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention*
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / adverse effects
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors / therapeutic use*
  • Postoperative Complications / chemically induced
  • Postoperative Complications / prevention & control
  • Surgical Procedures, Operative*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Biomarkers
  • Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
  • Clonidine
  • Aspirin

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01082874

Grants and funding