Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Review

Optimize your documentation to improve Medicare reimbursement

Ecler Ercole Jaqua, MD, Robert Chi, MD, Wessam Labib, MD, MPH, Marcos Uribe, MD, Juan Najarro, MD and Mary Hanna, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine July 2020, 87 (7) 427-434; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.87a.19116
Ecler Ercole Jaqua
Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Robert Chi
PGY-3 Resident, Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wessam Labib
Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine; Head & Medical Director, Division of Geriatric Medicine; Director, Family Medicine Medical Student Education; Medical Director, Department of Physician Assistant Sciences, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcos Uribe
Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juan Najarro
Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mary Hanna
Assistant Professor, Department of Family Medicine, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

ABSTRACT

There’s nothing more frustrating than not getting credit for work performed. Physicians often leave large amounts of compensation on the table, because even though services were provided, insurance payers do not recognize the work due to suboptimal documentation. This problem is especially apparent in preventive medicine and wellness visits with adult and geriatric patients, and results in physician services being undervalued. This article outlines specific documentation requirements for receiving full credit for the work already provided by most primary care physicians.

KEY POINTS
  • Billing for outpatient evaluation and management has 5 levels, determined by 3 elements: the history, physical examination, and medical decision-making. In a new patient, all 3 elements must meet the criteria for a given level to be compensated at that level, but in an already established patient, only 2 of the 3 need to.

  • It is important to classify geriatric visits into 2 separate categories: the new wellness visit and the standard office visit.

  • Many clinics have adopted screening questions to assess patients’ overall health, which patients can answer by filling out a form while waiting for their visit.

  • To receive compensation for a preventive service, 3 components must be documented: the amount of time spent counseling, the Current Procedural Terminology code, and the linked diagnosis.

Geriatric patients are complex. The typical older adult is more likely to suffer from severe end-stage diseases, adverse effects of polypharmacy, and lack of social support, resulting in poorer overall outcomes. The goal for the primary care physician is to address as many of these complaints as possible in an efficient matter, while documenting and billing appropriately for procedures to ensure that taking care of the geriatric population remains a cost-effective endeavor.

This article provides clear templates and instructions to ensure all geriatric services rendered are properly billed and coded for and briefly reviews general medical billing in the outpatient setting.

OVERVIEW OF GENERAL MEDICAL BILLING IN OUTPATIENTS

The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes used in outpatient billing for evaluation and management are typically divided into 5 levels for new patients (99201–99205) and established patients (99211–99215), determined by the number of topics documented in the history, physical examination, and medical decision-making.

For a new patient, all 3 sections must meet the criteria for the level in order to bill for the corresponding level (Table 1).1,2 For instance, if the history and the physical examination are documented to a level 3 standard, and the medical decision-making is documented to a level 4 standard, then the overall visit will count as a level 3, despite the medical decision-making, because the history and physical were not documented at the level 4 standard.1 (A new patient is defined as one who has nev er been seen by a physician in your group, or as a patient who has not been seen in 3 years.)

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

New patient office visit evaluation and management codes

In an already-established patient, only 2 of the 3 areas need to meet the documentation criteria in order to bill at a specific level (Table 2). For example, if the history and examination meet the criteria for level 4, and the medical decision-making meets the criteria for level 3, the note can still be billed as a level 4.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 2

Established patient office visit evaluation and management codes

As a side note, billing based on time is an acceptable alternative. However, significantly more time (30 minutes) is required to bill at a level 3, which is typically completed in the 15-minute patient time slot allotted in most clinics. When billing based on time, the history, examination, and medical decision-making do not need to hit the required level of documentation.1,2

GERIATRIC BILLING: DETERMINING THE VISIT TYPE

It is important to classify geriatric visits into 2 separate categories: the new wellness visit and the standard office visit. This is essential because while a large portion of preventive services (depression screening, advance care planning, smoking cessation, sexually transmitted diseases screening, alcohol counseling, weight counseling, and heart disease counseling) can be administered at either category of visit, a cognitive assessment is only billable during a wellness visit or a specific visit for cognitive assessment.2 See Table 3 for the complete inclusion criteria.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 3

Billable preventive services

However, if the patient presents for a wellness visit with a separate chief complaint, it is also allowable to “split-bill” the visit as both a wellness and standard visit as long as 2 separate notes exist for the encounter. The caveat is that a patient can only be billed for a wellness preventive visit once per year, but split billing can often dramatically increase the Relative Value Units (RVUs) generated by a single wellness visit.

THE ANNUAL WELLNESS VISIT

The annual wellness visit (AWV) is an incentive visit provided by Medicare. Many people refer to the AWV as “the yearly physical,” which is a misconception. The AWV is simple, and its main focus is to perform a health risk assessment and create a personalized prevention plan.

There are 2 billable codes for an AWV: G0438—initial annual wellness visit, which can only be assigned once in a patient’s life, and G0439—subsequent annual wellness visit.3 Of importance, certain documentation is required to bill for these codes (Table 4).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 4

Required documentation for an initial annual wellness visit

As a side note there is a “Welcome to Medicare” visit code (G0402) that is considered an Initial Preventive Physical Examination (IPPE) and not a billable code for AWV. The IPPE is covered only once within the first 12 months of Medicare Part B enrollment. The goal of the IPPE is essentially to review medical and social history along with health promotion, education, disease prevention, and detection. The initial AWV (G0438) can be offered 12 months after the patient received the IPPE or 12 months after the patient was enrolled under Medicare Part B. A subsequent wellness visit (G0439) can be offered annually.2,4

For more detailed information see: www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/AWV_Chart_ICN905706.pdf.

This may seem like a lot of documentation, but with appropriate staff coordination, previsit data collection, and appropriate templates it will not take more than 20 minutes with documentation included.3,4 Table 5 is a sample note with the required documentation to bill for an annual wellness visit.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 5

Annual wellness visit template

COGNITIVE ASSESSMENT

Cognitive assessment is an examination to evaluate a person’s cognitive level, remaining abilities, and capacity to function. It can be provided to any patient who exhibits any signs or symptoms of cognitive impairment,3 in either a wellness visit or a specific cognitive assessment visit (see below).

Several standardized tests are available to be used by any eligible medical provider (physicians, nurse practitioners, clinical nurse specialists, and physician assistants). Some acceptable tools to assess cognition are the Mini-Cog, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, Saint Louis University Mental Status Examination, Memory Impairment Screen, and AD8 Dementia Screening Interview.5,6

Specific cognitive assessment visit

For geriatric patients with suspected cognitive dysfunction, a specific cognitive assessment visit (CPT 99483) can be performed. The cognitive assessment visit is a stand-alone visit code and it can be cobilled with wellness visits or preventive services, but not with a standard office visit.5,7,8 It is recommended that if a cognitive assessment is performed, the entire visit should be billed as a cognitive assessment (3.44), as the total number of RVUs generated exceeds a new patient level 5 visit (3.17). The cognitive assessment visit requirements are not the same described in the AWV (Table 5). See Table 6 for the required elements that need to be documented in order to code CPT 99483.5

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 6

Cognitive assessment visit: Required elements

For more detailed information see: www.alz.org/careplanning/downloads/cms-consensus.pdf.

MAXIMIZING PREVENTIVE SERVICES

Regardless of the chief complaints, many clinics have adopted automatic screening questions or quality metrics to assess patients’ overall health, such as body mass index monitoring, screening for smoking and alcohol use, or even “health vital signs” such as asking patients to estimate how much exercise they perform in a week. Often, these screening questions are given to the patient on a paper form to fill out while waiting for the doctor’s visit.6,7 The reason these monitoring metrics are included is to maximize the billing for any particular encounter.

To optimize potential for billable preventive services, annual wellness screening paperwork should include questions regarding depression, alcohol use, tobacco use, sexually transmitted disease risk factors, and cardiovascular risk factors. A positive answer on any of these screens should prompt a brief discussion during the encounter with the appropriate billing code and time documented. The reason for including these questions on the AWV is that many counseling services can only be billed for once a year.7,8

To maximize preventive services, wellness visits should be set for at least a 30-minute time slot, not only to manage whatever chief concern the patient brings, but also to address as many positive screening questions as possible. Furthermore, having more time in the wellness visit allows for overlapping counseling such as smoking cessation, cardiac risk factor counseling, and alcohol cessation to ensure the time criterion is met for each topic. See Table 7 for the requirement time for each billable code, RVU value, and the required interval of time before each service can be billed for again.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 7

Billing and documentation criteria for preventive services

DOCUMENTING FOR PREVENTIVE VISITS

To receive compensation from Medicare for a preventive service, 3 components must be documented,8 ie, the amount of time spent counseling, the CPT code, and the linked diagnosis. This will improve Medicare reimbursement for the preventive services that a primary care physician regularly provides. However, these services are not exclusive to primary care physicians: they can be billed for by any medical specialist as long as they are properly documented and not billed by another physician (usually the primary care physician) in the specific required interval for that service. For example, if a primary care physician documents and bills for a particular service after a subspecialist does, the primary care physician won’t get reimbursed.

For more detailed information see: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Coding/MedHCPC-SGenInfo/index.

The time documented in the services requiring time attestation cannot overlap be tween the time for the standard office visit and the time for other preventive services. See Table 8 for examples of time attestation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 8

Time attestation for 2 services

REIMBURSEMENT FOR CARE PROVIDED

The role of the primary physician is to provide comprehensive care to the individual. But often, the care provided is not reflected in the Medicare reimbursement as a result of incomplete or inadequate documentation. While initially daunting, proper optimization of the clinic visits to include previsit screening questions, increased time slots for wellness visits, and note templates with prebuilt preventive coding can dramatically increase the RVUs generated for services that most physicians already provide.

Glossary
  • AWV—Annual Wellness Visit

  • CPT—Current Procedural Terminology

  • E/M—evaluation and management

  • HPI—history of present illness

  • IPPE—Initial Preventive Physical Examination

  • PFSH—past medical, family, and social history

  • ROS—review of systems

  • RVU—Relative Value Unit

  • Copyright © 2020 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
    . 1995 documentation guidelines for evaluation and management services. https://www.cms.gov/outreach-and-education/medicare-learning-network-mln/mlnedwebguide/downloads/95docguidelines.pdf. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
    . Coding. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/HospitalAcqCond/Coding.html. Published July 18, 2019. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. Medicare
    . Yearly “Wellness” visits. https://www.medicare.gov/coverage/yearly-wellness-visits. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. Cuenca AE,
    2. Kapsner S
    . Medicare wellness visits: reassessing their value to your patients and your practice. Fam Pract Manag 2019; 26(2):25–30. pmid:30855118
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians
    . Cognitive Evaluation. https://www.aafp.org/patient-care/public-health/cognitive-care/cognitive-evaluation.html. Published April 17, 2017. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. Alzheimer’s Association
    . Alzheimer’s & Dementia. https://www.alz.org/. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. American Academy of Family Physicians
    . What is the Medicare annual wellness visit (AWV)? https://www.aafp.org/practice-management/payment/coding/medicare-coordination-services/awv.html. Published March 20, 2017. Accessed June 4, 2020.
    1. American College of Physicians
    . How to bill Medicare’s annual wellness visit (AWV). https://www.acponline.org/practice-resources/business-resources/payment/medicare-payment-and-regulations-resources/how-to-bill-medicares-annual-wellness-visit-awv. Accessed June 4, 2020.

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire