The injured worker: assessing “return-to-work” status

Daniel J. Mazanec

The injured worker: assessing “return-to-work” status

Daniel J. Mazanec, MD
Daniel J. Mazanec
Center for the Spine, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
MD

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
May 1996,
63
(3)
166-171;

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY In workers injured on the job, the physical findings tell only part of the story. Physicians must also consider psychologic, economic, social, and legal factors when performing a return-to-work assessment.

INDEX TERMS

PDF

Previous Next

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts

Alerts for this Article

User Name *

Password *

Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email *
Email Article

Email This Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.
NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.
Your Email *

Your Name *

Send To *

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.

You are going to email the following
The injured worker: assessing “return-to-work” status
Message Subject
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Message Body
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.

Your Personal Message

CAPTCHA

This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Citation Tools
The injured worker: assessing “return-to-work” status

Daniel J. Mazanec

Daniel J. Mazanec

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

May 1996,

63

(3)

166-171;

Citation Manager Formats

BibTeX
Bookends
EasyBib
EndNote (tagged)
EndNote 8 (xml)
Medlars
Mendeley
Papers
RefWorks Tagged
Ref Manager
RIS
Zotero

Share
Share This Article
The injured worker: assessing “return-to-work” status

Daniel J. Mazanec

Daniel J. Mazanec

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

May 1996,

63

(3)

166-171;

Share This Article:
Post