Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Letters to the Editor

In Reply: Prostate cancer screening

Timothy Gilligan, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2021, 88 (5) 262; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.88c.05004
Timothy Gilligan
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Find this author on Cleveland Clinic
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In Reply: I am grateful that Mr. Kurator and Dr. Jenkins took the time to read my commentary and to respond to it. The debate about prostate cancer screening remains fraught, and passions run high on both sides. Like screening for breast cancer, colon cancer, and cervical cancer, screening for prostate cancer has never been shown to have an impact on all-cause mortality in a randomized controlled trial. Some critics of cancer screening argue that without an overall survival benefit, screening should not be recommended. (It is worth noting that colon cancer and cervical cancer screening can detect precancerous lesions and thus have the additional benefit of reducing the risk of needing more aggressive surgery.) The critics’ argument, then, is that it is not enough to reduce your risk of dying of prostate cancer or breast cancer: screening should result in your living longer. The challenge is that any individual disease represents a very small fraction of all-cause mortality, and the disease-specific mortality benefit is thus lost in the noise. There is also the legitimate concern that screening may be increasing other causes of mortality and thus simply exchanging one cause of death for another. There is no space to rehash this argument here, but the disagreement about end points for cancer screening trials persists.

Whether the admittedly modest benefit of prostate cancer screening is worth the harms cannot be answered without including the patient in the discussion: the value placed on the different benefits and harms will vary from man to man. There are experts who are in favor of screening and experts who are opposed to screening, and it would be paternalistic to let patients hear only one side of the debate, hence the role of shared decision-making. It is also important for patients and clinicians to know that prostate cancer screening is evolving, and the decision-makng about whom to biopsy and whom to treat has become more nuanced. The hope is that this will increase the benefits and decrease the harms, but that remains to be proven. In the meantime, each of us men needs to decide whether we will choose to be tested. I won’t choose for you if you don’t choose for me.

  • Copyright © 2021 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 88 (5)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 88, Issue 5
1 May 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Reply: Prostate cancer screening
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In Reply: Prostate cancer screening
Timothy Gilligan
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2021, 88 (5) 262; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.88c.05004

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In Reply: Prostate cancer screening
Timothy Gilligan
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine May 2021, 88 (5) 262; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.88c.05004
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • In Reply: In defense of the anion gap
  • In defense of the anion gap
  • Effective but inaccessible antiobesity medications
Show more Letters to the editor

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Men's Health
  • Oncology
  • Preventive Care

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire