Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Review

Ambulatory ECG monitoring in the age of smartphones

David Sanders, MD, Leo Ungar, MD, Michael A. Eskander, MD and Arnold H. Seto, MD, MPA
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine July 2019, 86 (7) 483-493; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.18123
David Sanders
Cardiology Fellow, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Leo Ungar
Cardiology Fellow, University of California, Irvine, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael A. Eskander
Cardiac Electrophysiology Fellow, University of California, San Diego, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arnold H. Seto
Chief of Cardiology, Long Beach Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Long Beach, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Figure 1
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Indications for ambulatory electrocardiography devices

    Diagnosis
    Unexplained palpitations
    Unexplained syncope
    Cryptogenic stroke
    Prognosis
    Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
    Arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia
    Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
    Primary arrhythmic diseases
    Arrhythmia treatment assessment
    Atrial fibrillation
    “Pill-in-the-pocket”
    After antiarrhythmic therapy
    Postablation
    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Features of ambulatory electrocardiography devices

    Backwards memory—Records data captured before patient activation
    Full disclosure—Provides arrhythmia data from the entire recording period
    Looping memory—Records over previously captured data, saving only what is pertinent, which reduces the need for extra memory capacity
    Multichannel—Records electrocardiographic signals from 2 or more leads simultaneously
    Post-event monitor—Recording activated by the patient when an event occurs
    Telemetry transmission—Continuously transmits data to a manned remote monitoring station
    Wearable device—Electronic device incorporated into a traditional form (eg, smartwatch) that can easily be worn
    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Ambulatory electrocardiography devices

    DeviceDesignDurationIndicationsAdvantagesLimitationsCost
    Holter monitor3–12 leads attached by wires
    Data are uploaded after recording is complete
    24–48 hours continuouslyPalpitations, syncope, or presyncope when symptoms occur nearly daily
    Silent arrhythmia that occurs frequently or to assess for arrhythmia recurrence after therapy
    Continuous recording
    Full disclosure
    Up to 12 leads
    Physician familiarity
    Short duration
    Post hoc analysis
    Uses wires and gel electrodes
    $
    Post-event recorderLeadless held to the chest during symptoms
    Real-time transmission of data for analysis
    Up to 30 days intermittentlyInfrequent symptoms (eg, palpitations) that are not debilitatingExtended observation
    Real-time data transmission
    Records only selected sequences
    Requires patient activation
    $
    External loop recorder3–12 leads attached by wires
    Records when triggered by patient or arrhythmia
    Up to 30 days; continuous observation and intermittent recordingInfrequent symptoms or suspected infrequent silent arrhythmiaExtended recording
    Automated arrhythmia analysis
    Multichannel acquisition
    Backwards memory
    Records only selected sequences
    Uses wires and gel electrodes
    $$
    Implantable loop recorderImplanted subcutaneously in the left parasternal regionUp to 3 years; continuous observation and intermittent recordingVery infrequent symptoms
    Suspected paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in cryptogenic stroke
    Very long observation
    Automated arrhythmia analysis
    Records only selected sequences
    Requires surgical insertion
    High cost
    $$$$
    Mobile cardiac telemetry3 leads attached by wires
    Communicates with portable monitor and real-time transmission for analysis
    1–4 weeks continuouslySuspected high-risk arrhythmia (eg, ventricular tachycardia) that can be identified and addressed in real time
    After starting new antiarrhythmic drug
    Continuous and extended recording
    Real-time rhythm analysis and response
    Requires significant manpower for monitoring
    High up-front cost for device
    $$$
    Patch monitorAffixed to the left pectoral region
    Some have real-time telemetry, others require later data analysis
    2–4 weeks continuouslyModerate frequency symptoms or suspected low-risk asymptomatic arrhythmiaContinuous recording
    Full disclosure
    Ergonomic design increases patient adherence
    Single channel
    Needs post hoc analysis
    $$
    Smart- tech ECGFingers are placed on an external sensor
    Generates a single- lead electrocardiogram on the phone or watch screen
    30 seconds intermittentlyIntermittent, low-risk, nondebilitating symptoms (eg, palpitations in low-risk clinical context)Widely available
    Automated rhythm analysis for atrial fibrillation
    Single channel
    No continuous observation
    Requires patient activation
    $
    • $ = < $150; $$ = $150–$500; $$$ = $500–$1,000; $$$$ = > $1,000

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 86 (7)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 86, Issue 7
1 Jul 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Ambulatory ECG monitoring in the age of smartphones
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Ambulatory ECG monitoring in the age of smartphones
David Sanders, Leo Ungar, Michael A. Eskander, Arnold H. Seto
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Jul 2019, 86 (7) 483-493; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18123

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Ambulatory ECG monitoring in the age of smartphones
David Sanders, Leo Ungar, Michael A. Eskander, Arnold H. Seto
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Jul 2019, 86 (7) 483-493; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18123
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • INDICATIONS FOR AMBULATORY ECG MONITORING
    • AMBULATORY ECG DEVICES
    • CHOOSING THE RIGHT DEVICE
    • NEWER TECHNOLOGIES
    • DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY AND DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER MARKETING
    • FUTURE DIRECTIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Alpha-gal syndrome: Recognizing and managing a tick-bite–related meat allergy
  • Managing right ventricular failure in the setting of pulmonary embolism
  • Psychedelics, spirituality, and existential distress in patients at the end of life
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cardiology

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire