Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
1-Minute Consult

Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?

Daniel Rozenbaum, MD, Anirudh Yalamanchali, MD, MS and Deborah Hornacek, MD, FSVM
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine October 2023, 90 (10) 611-614; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.90a.23018
Daniel Rozenbaum
Clinical Fellow, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Anirudh Yalamanchali
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Deborah Hornacek
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Section of Vascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH; Clinical Assistant Professor, Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Find this author on Cleveland Clinic
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

An 84-year-old female was admitted for pyelonephritis complicated by septic shock and Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia. She was treated with antibiotics and she clinically improved. However, she later developed daily fevers with temperatures up to 39°C (102.2°F) with a negative repeat workup for infectious disease. Should you consider venous thromboembolism (VTE) as a potential cause of her fevers?

The hospitalized patient with unexplained fever is a commonly encountered diagnostic challenge. These patients constitute a heterogeneous group that shares broad differential diagnoses and often the need for extensive and expensive testing.

Venous thrombosis of the extremities has been traditionally taught to be a cause of occult fevers, and its diagnosis can be reliably made using a noninvasive test, compression duplex ultrasonography (CDUS). Hence, the use of CDUS in the workup of unexplained fever has increased despite the paucity of evidence on safety and cost-effectiveness in this clinical context.1,2

Although CDUS is essentially a risk-free procedure that can be performed on virtually any patient, clinical reasoning based on the outcome of this test could lead to substantial harm. The most important risks are stopping the diagnostic process prematurely if CDUS identifies an incidental thrombus, and the unlikely, but possible, risk of false-positive results leading to inappropriate anticoagulation therapy. Given these potential risks and the substantial financial cost associated with CDUS, ordering this as an initial test is not advisable. We reviewed the literature to provide clinicians with recommendations on when to order CDUS of the extremities in the evaluation of hospitalized patients with unexplained fever.

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AND FEVERS: CAUSATION VS MERE ASSOCIATION?

Thrombosis involves endothelial activation and inflammation, which has been hypothesized to be pyrogenic.3 However, VTE risk factors (eg, malignancy, infection, recent surgery, autoimmune diseases) are associated with fevers even in the absence of thrombosis, possibly acting as confounding variables in the association between VTE and fevers.4,5 Hence, it is important to revisit the traditional teaching that venous thrombosis of the extremities causes fevers.

The association between VTE and fevers has been frequently described in case series. The estimated prevalence is highly variable and ranges between 4.9% and 33.3% in recent studies (Table 1).6–11 This wide range is likely related to different temperature cutoffs, sites of measurement, measurement timing and frequency, scope of investigation (venous thrombosis of extremity alone vs pulmonary embolism), and the extent to which patients were evaluated for other causes of fevers before attributing the fever to VTE.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
TABLE 1

Fever characteristics in case series of VTE

Despite the attempt to rule out alternative causes of fever in some series, the possibility of unidentified etiologies threatens the claim that thromboembolic events are causally related to fevers. Two studies emphasized this concern after finding similar temperatures in patients diagnosed with VTE and unmatched patients who had negative testing.4,12 In a prospective study evaluating computed-tomography angiography, Stein et al reported temperatures greater than 38.5°C (101.3°F) in 2% of patients with both positive (n = 191) and negative (n = 632) testing for pulmonary embolism.12

In a study by Kazmers et al,9 oral temperatures were measured in 1,847 patients referred for venous doppler ultrasonography of the lower extremities. Fever [defined as temperature > 37.8°C (100.4°F)] was present in 9.5% of the 175 patients diagnosed with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and 7.5% of the remaining 1,678 patients. This difference was not statistically significant. When temperature was analyzed as a continuous variable, the authors detected a statistically significant but clinically small difference between patients with and without thrombosis (mean temperatures of 37.0 ± 0.6°C and 36.9 ± 0.6°C, respectively; P < .02).9

The main limitation of these studies is that the study groups may have differed in characteristics other than the presence of thrombosis. For example, patients referred for CDUS who did not have DVT may have had a higher rate of cellulitis as an alternative cause of their symptoms. Despite the limitations, the results of the study by Kazmers et al9 suggest that body temperature may be elevated by acute thrombosis, though this seems to happen only to a mild degree or only in occasional patients, given the similar mean temperature across both groups.

YIELD OF COMPRESSION DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN EVALUATING UNEXPLAINED FEVERS

Two studies investigated the yield of venous doppler ultrasonography in patients being evaluated for unexplained fevers.1,2 AbuRahma et al2 retrospectively reviewed 89 patients undergoing a fever workup who had their lower extremities assessed for venous thrombosis. Acute DVT was diagnosed in 7 patients (7.9%), though only 5 patients (5.6%) met the study criteria to ascribe the fever to the thrombotic event.

Yoo et al1 reviewed orders for 4-extremity venous Doppler ultrasonography in their vascular imaging laboratory. Out of 188 orders, 101 had fevers listed as the indication. Of these 101 orders, acute DVT was diagnosed in 11 patients (10.9%), though a more likely etiology for the fevers was found in 10 patients, leaving only 1 patient (1.0%) to have fever attributed to the DVT. These findings highlight the risk of premature closure if fever workup is terminated after identifying the presence of VTE.

UPPER-EXTREMITY COMPRESSION DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY

If CDUS is ordered to screen for DVT in patients with unexplained fevers in the absence of signs of venous thrombosis in any extremity, the question of which extremities to scan remains. In the study by Yoo et al,1 which evaluated 188 orders for 4-extremity CDUS performed for various indications, 31 patients had acute DVT. Of the total number, 16 cases were only in the lower extremities, 11 were only in the upper extremities, and 4 were in both the upper and lower extremities. All 15 patients with upper-extremity DVT had a central venous catheter in place.1 Furthermore, several studies suggest that central venous catheters and active cancer markedly increase the odds of upper-extremity DVT.13,14 These findings suggest that upper-extremity Doppler ultrasonography in asymptomatic limbs should only be considered in individuals with increased pretest probability of upper-extremity thrombosis, such as those with an indwelling catheter or active cancer.

EVIDENCE SUMMARY

Overall, current evidence suggesting that VTE could cause fevers is weak, and in most cases where these two phenomena coincide, they are not causally related. Moreover, in the population presenting with unexplained fevers, the yield of venous Doppler ultrasonography is low. Hence, given the costs and potential harm associated with its use, we believe that venous Doppler ultrasonography should not be an initial test and should be ordered only when an exhaustive evaluation has been completed for more common causes of fever in the hospitalized patient. Caution should be taken before ascribing fevers to a venous thrombotic event. Lastly, when a decision has been made to use the test in asymptomatic extremities, we suggest scanning the lower extremities only, unless there are risk factors for upper-extremity venous thrombosis.

CASE CONTINUED

In our 84-year-old patient, CDUS was ordered and showed a small echogenic image suggestive of a venous thrombus where the patient had had an internal jugular vein catheter (Figure 1). Given the minuscule size of the thrombus and the presence of an alternative cause of the fever, ie, aspiration pneumonitis, the thrombus was thought to have been an incidental finding rather than the true cause of her fevers.

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The left panel shows the right internal jugular vein with a scant amount of thrombus adherent to the anterior wall of the vessel (arrow). The right panel shows essentially complete compression of the right internal jugular vein on compression duplex ultrasonography.

DISCLOSURES

The authors report no relevant financial relationships which, in the context of their contributions, could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

  • Copyright © 2023 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Yoo T,
    2. Aggarwal R,
    3. Brathwaite S,
    4. Satiani B,
    5. Haurani MJ
    . Four-extremity venous duplex ultrasound for suspected deep venous thrombosis is an anachronism. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2019; 7(3):325–332.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jvsv.2018.11.004
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. AbuRahma AF,
    2. Saiedy S,
    3. Robinson PA,
    4. Boland JP,
    5. Cottrell DJ 4th.,
    6. Stuart C
    . Role of venous duplex imaging of the lower extremities in patients with fever of unknown origin. Surgery 1997; 121(4): 366–371. doi:10.1016/s0039-6060(97)90305-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Stark K,
    2. Massberg S
    . Interplay between inflammation and thrombosis in cardiovascular pathology. Nat Rev Cardiol 2021; 18(9): 666–682. doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00552-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Kaul DR,
    2. Flanders SA,
    3. Beck JM,
    4. Saint S
    . Brief report: incidence, etiology, risk factors, and outcome of hospital-acquired fever: a systematic, evidence-based review. J Gen Intern Med 2006; 21(11):1184–1187. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00566x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Abdelmaseeh TA,
    2. Azmat CE,
    3. Oliver TI
    . Postoperative Fever. In: Stat-Pearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2023.
  6. ↵
    1. Barba R,
    2. Di Micco P,
    3. Blanco-Molina A, et al
    . Fever and deep venous thrombosis. Findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2011;32(3):288–292. doi:10.1007/s11239-011-0604-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Stein PD,
    2. Afzal A,
    3. Henry JW,
    4. Villareal CG
    . Fever in acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 2000; 117(1):39–42. doi:10.1378/chest.117.1.39
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saad M,
    2. Shaikh DH,
    3. Mantri N,
    4. Alemam A,
    5. Zhang A,
    6. Adrish M
    . Fever is associated with higher morbidity and clot burden in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. BMJ Open Respir Res 2018; 5(1):e000327. doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2018-000327
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kazmers A,
    2. Groehn H,
    3. Meeker C
    . Do patients with acute deep vein thrombosis have fever? Am Surg 2000; 66(6):598–601. doi:10.1177/000313480006600615
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Calvo-Romero JM,
    2. Lima-Rodríguez EM,
    3. Pérez-Miranda M,
    4. Bureo-Dacal P
    . Low-grade and high-grade fever at presentation of acute pulmonary embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2004; 15(4): 331–333. doi:10.1097/00001721-200406000-00007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kokturk N,
    2. Demir N,
    3. Oguzulgen IK,
    4. Demirel K,
    5. Ekim N
    . Fever in pulmonary embolism. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis 2005; 16(5):341–347. doi:10.1097/01.mbc.0000172693.77610.10
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Stein PD,
    2. Beemath A,
    3. Matta F, et al
    . Clinical characteristics of patients with acute pulmonary embolism: data from PIOPED II. Am J Med 2007;120(10):871–879. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.03.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Winters JP,
    2. Callas PW,
    3. Cushman M,
    4. Repp AB,
    5. Zakai NA
    . Central venous catheters and upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in medical inpatients: the Medical Inpatients and Thrombosis (MITH) study. J Thromb Haemost 2015; 13(12):2155–2160. doi:10.1111/jth.13131
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lee JA,
    2. Zierler BK,
    3. Zierler RE
    . The risk factors and clinical outcomes of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012; 46(2):139–144. doi:10.1177/1538574411432145
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 90 (10)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 90, Issue 10
1 Oct 2023
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?
Daniel Rozenbaum, Anirudh Yalamanchali, Deborah Hornacek
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Oct 2023, 90 (10) 611-614; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.90a.23018

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?
Daniel Rozenbaum, Anirudh Yalamanchali, Deborah Hornacek
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Oct 2023, 90 (10) 611-614; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.90a.23018
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM AND FEVERS: CAUSATION VS MERE ASSOCIATION?
    • YIELD OF COMPRESSION DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN EVALUATING UNEXPLAINED FEVERS
    • UPPER-EXTREMITY COMPRESSION DUPLEX ULTRASONOGRAPHY
    • EVIDENCE SUMMARY
    • CASE CONTINUED
    • DISCLOSURES
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

1-Minute Consult

  • What diagnostic tests should be done after discovering clubbing in a patient without cardiopulmonary symptoms?
  • Does my adult patient need a measles vaccine?
  • Do I need to treat supine hypertension in my hospitalized patient?
Show more 1-Minute Consult

Hospital-Medicine

  • Elevated aminotransferases in a 62-year-old woman
  • Anchors away
  • COVID-19: A management update
Show more Hospital-Medicine

Vascular-Medicine

  • Is the MTHFR gene mutation associated with thrombosis?
  • Anchors away
  • Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?
Show more Vascular-Medicine

Infectious-Diseases

  • Is the MTHFR gene mutation associated with thrombosis?
  • Anchors away
  • Should you use compression duplex ultrasonography to detect deep vein thrombosis to evaluate unexplained fevers?
Show more Infectious-Diseases

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Hospital Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Vascular Medicine

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire