Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
1-Minute Consult

What fluids should I order for my patient with acute pancreatitis?

Anusha Agarwal, MD, Arjun Chatterjee, MD and Prabhleen Chahal, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine August 2024, 91 (8) 466-468; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.91a.24027
Anusha Agarwal
Department of Internal Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Arjun Chatterjee
Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Prabhleen Chahal
Professor, Chief, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, TX
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

A 47-year-old female with a history of type 2 diabetes and hyperlipidemia presents to the emergency room with a 2-day history of nausea, vomiting, and severe epigastric pain radiating to the back. The patient is hemodynamically stable, though she appears fatigued and diaphoretic. Physical examination reveals dry mucous membranes and epigastric tenderness. No leukocytosis or electrolyte abnormalities are noted. Her blood urea nitrogen level is 24 mg/dL (reference range 5–20 mg/dL), and serum creatinine is 1.3 mg/dL (0.6–1.2 mg/dL); these values are mildly elevated from baseline. Lipase is elevated at 1,200 u/L (0–160 u/L). Bedside ultrasonography of the right upper quadrant reveals gallstones. The patient meets the diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis and is admitted to the hospital for further management. Nothing by mouth status is ordered along with appropriate analgesic agents for pain control. What fluids should be ordered in this patient with acute pancreatitis?

The cornerstone of acute pancreatitis treatment is fluid resuscitation, early enteral nutrition as tolerated, and analgesia. However, consensus for certain aspects of fluid resuscitation is lacking, especially regarding the type and volume of fluid. For years, early, aggressive fluid resuscitation was preferred. Limited, equivocal evidence supported the use of lactated Ringer’s solution vs normal saline in acute pancreatitis management. Data from recent studies, however, show that moderate fluid resuscitation is associated with fewer adverse events1 and that lactated Ringer’s may be superior to normal saline in acute pancreatitis management.2

WHY IS FLUID RESUSCITATION IMPORTANT IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS?

Acute pancreatitis, an inflammatory condition of the pancreas, often precipitates a systemic inflammatory response, which can have a wide range of clinical consequences. More than 275,000 patients are hospitalized each year with acute pancreatitis, making it the third leading cause of hospitalization due to gastrointestinal disease in the United States and costing the US healthcare system more than $2.6 billion annually.3

Several factors predispose patients to develop hypovolemia in acute pancreatitis. Third-spacing coupled with classic symptoms of vomiting, reduced oral intake, and diaphoresis are frequent causes of hypovolemia in acute pancreatitis. Inflammation of the pancreatic parenchyma leads to recruitment of cytokines and other inflammatory molecules that increase vascular permeability, resulting in the movement of fluid from the intravascular space to the extravascular space. This inflammatory response activates numerous cascades, including pancreatic hypoperfusion, which, if persistent, can give rise to severe complications such as acinar cell death followed by pancreatic necrosis.4 Studies have shown that persistent hypovolemia in acute pancreatitis is associated with pancreatic necrosis, organ failure, and poor outcomes. These findings correlate with data demonstrating improvement in morbidity and mortality with early fluid resuscitation.4,5 It is posited that early fluid resuscitation provides macro- and microcirculatory support to reduce the risk of the aforementioned catastrophic consequences.6

HOW MUCH FLUID SHOULD I ORDER?

Early aggressive hydration in acute pancreatitis typically entails an initial fluid bolus followed by intravenous maintenance fluids at a rate of 250 to 500 mL/hour. This practice has been widely accepted in clinical settings, yet limited data exist to support it. Several randomized controlled trials, limited by small sample sizes and specific inclusion criteria, have demonstrated conflicting results for the role of aggressive fluid therapy in acute pancreatitis.6

The landmark WATERFALL (Early Weight-Based Aggressive vs Nonaggressive Goal-Directed Fluid Resuscitation in the Early Phase of Acute Pancreatitis) trial,1 published in 2022, sought to address this evidence gap by assessing the safety and efficacy of aggressive fluid resuscitation in patients with acute pancreatitis. In this multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial, aggressive fluid resuscitation consisted of a 20 mL/kg bolus followed by 3 mL/kg/hour maintenance, and moderate fluid resuscitation, a 10 mL/kg bolus, given only if patient was clinically hypovolemic, followed by 1.5 mL/kg/hour maintenance. Patients with moderately severe or severe pancreatitis with signs of organ failure were excluded.1 Early aggressive fluid resuscitation led to a higher incidence of fluid overload (20.5% vs 6.3%) compared with moderate fluid resuscitation (adjusted relative risk 2.85, 95% confidence interval 1.36–5.94, P = .004), which notably led to early halting of the trial at the first safety checkpoint. The study also showed no significant difference in the overall health outcomes between the 2 fluid-resuscitation groups. Ultimately, the WATERFALL trial results favor the use of moderate fluid resuscitation in clinical practice, shifting the paradigm for early management of acute pancreatitis.

SHOULD I ORDER THE SAME AMOUNT OF FLUID FOR ALL PATIENTS?

There are some caveats regarding the WATERFALL trial1 results. This trial excluded patients who are at higher risk for volume overload at baseline, such as patients with heart failure, cirrhosis, and chronic renal failure. Patients with moderately severe acute pancreatitis (organ failure that resolves within 48 hours or local or systemic complications without persistent organ failure) and severe acute pancreatitis (persistent organ failure [> 48 hours]), as defined by the revised Atlanta classification,7 were also excluded. In patients who meet the exclusion criteria from the WATERFALL trial and are prone to volume overload, cautious use of fluids with close monitoring of volume status is needed to avoid progression of acute pancreatitis and worsening of their baseline comorbid conditions.

In patients with moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis who may not be prone to volume overload at baseline, the optimal amount of fluid resuscitation remains unclear. As such, biomarkers such as blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, and hematocrit have been used as surrogate markers of successful hydration in patients with acute pancreatitis.4,8 Absolute cutoffs for these biomarkers have not been defined, and thus clinical judgment is needed when assessing a patient’s overall volume status during fluid resuscitation, especially within the first 48 hours.

LACTATED RINGER’S VS NORMAL SALINE: WHICH SHOULD I ORDER?

While the importance of fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis is well established, uncertainty remains regarding which type of intravenous fluid should be given. Pilot trials have shown potential benefit of lactated Ringer’s over normal saline in achieving faster clinical recovery in mild acute pancreatitis9 and reducing the risk of intensive care unit admission.10 Studies have proposed that the perceived benefits of lactated Ringer’s over normal saline may be due to superior pH homeostasis with lactated Ringer’s infusion.11 Normal saline infusion can lead to hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. The creation of an acidic environment makes acinar cells more susceptible to injury and enables inappropriate trypsinogen activation, a key step in acute pancreatitis pathogenesis.11 Nonetheless, these studies were limited by small sample size and lack of variation in disease severity, which impacted the generalizability of their results.9,10

To address this scarcity of data, Lee et al,2 using data from 999 patients with acute pancreatitis, conducted an observational study looking at the relationship between the type of intravenous fluid (lactated Ringer’s vs normal saline) administered within the first 24 hours and the development of moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis. Analysis showed that lactated Ringer’s administration within the first 24 hours was associated with reduced odds of developing moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis, thereby improving acute pancreatitis outcomes (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, P = .014).2 This well-powered study adds to the literature that supports lactated Ringer’s over normal saline in acute pancreatitis management. Nevertheless, the limitations of an observational study must be kept in mind. An adequately powered randomized controlled trial is needed to establish stronger evidence for the perceived benefits of lactated Ringer’s over normal saline in acute pancreatitis.

THE BOTTOM LINE

The hallmark for acute pancreatitis management remains early fluid resuscitation, analgesia, and nutritional support. The landmark WATERFALL trial1 established that aggressive fluid resuscitation is associated with a higher incidence of volume overload with no significant improvement in health outcomes, favoring the strategy of moderate fluid resuscitation in clinical practice. Emerging data suggest that lactated Ringer’s is associated with improved health outcomes and hence may be superior to normal saline in acute pancreatitis management.1,2

DISCLOSURES

The authors report no relevant financial relationships which, in the context of their contributions, could be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

  • Copyright © 2024 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. de-Madaria E,
    2. Buxbaum JL,
    3. Maisonneuve P, et al
    . Aggressive or moderate fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2022; 387(11):989–1000. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2202884
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lee PJ,
    2. Culp S,
    3. Kamal A, et al
    . Lactated ringers use in the first 24 hours of hospitalization is associated with improved outcomes in 999 patients with acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118(12):2258–2266. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000002391
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Peery AF,
    2. Crockett SD,
    3. Barritt AS, et al
    . Burden of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States. Gastroenterology 2015; 149(7):1731–1741.e3. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.08.045
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Takeda K,
    2. Mikami Y,
    3. Fukuyama S, et al
    . Pancreatic ischemia associated with vasospasm in the early phase of human acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Pancreas 2005; 30(1):40–49. pmid:15632698
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wall I,
    2. Badalov N,
    3. Baradarian R,
    4. Iswara K,
    5. Li JJ,
    6. Tenner S
    . Decreased mortality in acute pancreatitis related to early aggressive hydration. Pancreas 2011; 40(4):547–550. doi:10.1097/MPA.0b013e318215368d
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Gardner TB,
    2. Vege SS,
    3. Pearson RK,
    4. Chari ST
    . Fluid resuscitation in acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008; 6(10): 1070–1076. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2008.05.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Banks PA,
    2. Bollen TL,
    3. Dervenis C, et al
    . Classification of acute pancreatitis—2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 2013; 62(1):102–111. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Tenner S
    . Initial management of acute pancreatitis: critical issues during the first 72 hours. Am J Gastroenterol 2004; 99(12): 2489–2494. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.40329.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Buxbaum JL,
    2. Quezada M,
    3. Da B, et al
    . Early aggressive hydration hastens clinical improvement in mild acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2017; 112(5):797–803. doi:10.1038/ajg.2017.40
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Lee A,
    2. Ko C,
    3. Buitrago C, et al
    . Lactated ringers vs normal saline resuscitation for mild acute pancreatitis: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2021; 160(3):955–957.e4. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.10.044
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Wu BU,
    2. Hwang JQ,
    3. Gardner TH, et al
    . Lactated ringer’s solution reduces systemic inflammation compared with saline in patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9(8):710–717.e1. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2011.04.026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 91 (8)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 91, Issue 8
1 Aug 2024
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
What fluids should I order for my patient with acute pancreatitis?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
What fluids should I order for my patient with acute pancreatitis?
Anusha Agarwal, Arjun Chatterjee, Prabhleen Chahal
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Aug 2024, 91 (8) 466-468; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.91a.24027

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
What fluids should I order for my patient with acute pancreatitis?
Anusha Agarwal, Arjun Chatterjee, Prabhleen Chahal
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Aug 2024, 91 (8) 466-468; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.91a.24027
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • WHY IS FLUID RESUSCITATION IMPORTANT IN ACUTE PANCREATITIS?
    • HOW MUCH FLUID SHOULD I ORDER?
    • SHOULD I ORDER THE SAME AMOUNT OF FLUID FOR ALL PATIENTS?
    • LACTATED RINGER’S VS NORMAL SALINE: WHICH SHOULD I ORDER?
    • THE BOTTOM LINE
    • DISCLOSURES
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • What diagnostic tests should be done after discovering clubbing in a patient without cardiopulmonary symptoms?
  • Does my adult patient need a measles vaccine?
  • Do I need to treat supine hypertension in my hospitalized patient?
Show more 1-Minute Consult

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Critical Care
  • Gastroenterology
  • Hospital Medicine

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire