Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Commentary

Calcium and vitamin D: To supplement or not?

Ian R. Reid, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine September 2018, 85 (9) 693-698; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.85a.18026
Ian R. Reid
University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

We live in the era of evidence-based medicine, so new interventions must meet criteria for both safety and efficacy before they are adopted. However, we have inherited many practices adopted before the current standards were in place, and we have not always been rigorous in reevaluating traditional remedies. A conservative belief in established practice or the influence of vested interests may account for this lack of rigor in reappraisal.1 Calcium and vitamin D supplements are possible examples of this phenomenon.

BONE METABOLISM IS TIGHTLY REGULATED

Bone is a connective tissue, its matrix composed principally of type 1 collagen, which provides tensile strength. Hydroxyapatite crystals, composed predominantly of calcium and phosphate, lie between the collagen fibers and provide compressive strength. In a tightly regulated process, osteoblasts lay down the collagenous matrix, and osteoclasts remove it. Mineralization of newly formed bone proceeds if normal levels of extracellular calcium and phosphate are present, in the absence of inhibitors of mineralization.

High calcium intake does not drive bone formation

The endocrine system is critical in maintaining normocalcemia. A decrease in calcium intake results in increased parathyroid hormone secretion, resulting in increased renal tubular calcium reabsorption, increased bone turnover (both formation and resorption), and increased activation of vitamin D leading to increased intestinal absorption of calcium. High calcium intake reverses these changes.

Thus, a normal serum calcium concentration can be maintained with calcium intake ranging from 200 to more than 2,000 mg/day, and rates of bone loss in postmenopausal women are unaffected by calcium intake (Figure 1).2

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

Absolute change in total body bone mineral content (BMC) over 5 years in normal postmenopausal women, as a function of each woman’s average calcium intake assessed at baseline and at year 5. The lines show the regression (with 95% confidence intervals) for this relationship (P = .53).

Reid IR, Bristow SM, Bolland MJ. Calcium supplements: benefits and risks. J Intern Med 2015; 278(4):354–368. Copyright 2015, The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

If calcium intake is very low, hypocalcemia and secondary hyperparathyroidism develop,3 and bone mineralization may be impaired. However, levels of calcium intake in Africa and in East and Southeast Asia are typically less than 400 mg/day,4 yet there is no evidence that these levels adversely affect skeletal health. In fact, fracture risk is lower in these regions than in North America, where calcium intake is several times greater.

Thus, some calcium intake is required to maintain circulating concentrations, but there is no mechanism by which high calcium intake can drive bone formation. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Vitamin D deficiency has little relationship with diet

Vitamin D is a biologically inactive secosteroid activated by hydroxylation in the liver and kidney to function as the key regulator of intestinal calcium absorption. As with calcium, its deficiency results in hypocalcemia and impaired bone mineralization.

Paradoxically, high levels of vitamin D stimulate bone resorption and inhibit bone mineralization in mice,5 and large doses increase bone resorption markers acutely in clinical studies.6 Thus, it is important to ensure an adequate vitamin D supply, but not an oversupply.

In the absence of supplements, most vitamin D is produced in the skin as a result of the action of ultraviolet light (from sunlight) on 7-dehydrocholesterol. Thus, vitamin D deficiency occurs in those deprived of skin exposure to sunlight (eg, due to veiling, living at high latitude, staying permanently indoors), but it has little relationship with diet.

ARE CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTS EFFECTIVE?

Calcium supplements are certainly biologically active. They transiently increase serum calcium concentrations, suppress parathyroid hormone, and reduce bone resorption.2 In the first year of use, they increase bone density by about 1% compared with placebo.7 However, longer use does not result in further bone density advantage over placebo,7 suggesting that the response simply reflects a decreased number of osteoclastic resorption sites and does not indicate a sustained change in bone balance.

A 1% difference in bone density would not be expected to reduce fracture risk, and a number of large, carefully conducted randomized controlled trials published over the last 15 years have failed to demonstrate anti fracture efficacy for calcium.8–12 As a result, the US Preventive Services Task Force recommends against the routine use of calcium supplements in community-dwelling adults.13

In contrast, in a placebo-controlled trial published in 1992, Chapuy et al14 found that elderly women residing in nursing homes who received calcium and vitamin D supplements had fewer fractures. At 18 months, by intention-to-treat analysis, nonvertebral fractures had occurred in 160 (12%) of 1,387 women in the supplement group compared with 215 (15%) of 1,403 women in the placebo group (P < .001). However, these women were severely vitamin D-deficient (the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level at baseline in the placebo group was 13 ng/mL, normal range 15–50), to the extent that many must have had osteomalacia.

Thus, this study shows that calcium and vitamin D are effective in managing osteomalacia, but the subsequent trials8–12 did not observe any benefit in community-dwelling cohorts. Meta-analyses that pool the Chapuy study with community-based studies generally find that calcium with vitamin D is beneficial, but the heterogeneity of these populations means that such pooling is inappropriate.15

It is sometimes stated that calcium and vitamin D should always be given with osteoporosis medications because the efficacy of these drugs has only been demonstrated when coadministered with these supplements. This is incorrect. The addition of calcium to alendronate does not alter its effects on bone density,16 and the antifracture efficacy of both bisphosphonates17 and estrogen18,19 has been demonstrated in the absence of supplementation with calcium or vitamin D. The evidence that bisphosphonates prevent fractures in the absence of calcium supplements has recently been strengthened by the results of a randomized controlled trial comparing zoledronate with placebo in women over age 65 with osteopenia.20

ARE CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTS SAFE?

Calcium supplements often cause gastrointestinal symptoms, particularly constipation. They have been shown to double the risk of hospital admission due to abdominal symptoms.21 In the absence of clear evidence of benefit, these facts alone should militate against their routine use. Calcium supplements also cause hypercalcemia and hypercalciuria22 and increase the risk of renal calculi (by 17% in the Women’s Health Initiative8).

Over the last decade, evidence has emerged that calcium supplements may also increase the risk of myocardial infarction, and possibly stroke. This finding was not statistically significant in any single study, but is consistently present in meta-analyses.23

Evidence from the Women’s Health Initiative

When studies of calcium with vitamin D are added to these meta-analyses, the results are less consistent. This is because such meta-analyses are dominated by the Women’s Health Initiative (because of its large size, with 36,282 participants). There have been 2 different analyses of this trial with respect to cardiovascular events.

When the Women’s Health Initiative as a whole was analyzed, there was no significant effect of calcium plus vitamin D on vascular end points. However, there is a significant interaction between body mass index and the effect of supplements, such that nonobese women demonstrated a 17% increase in myocardial infarction.24 This study was unusual in that it included women already taking calcium and vitamin D supplements.

There was a significant interaction between baseline use of supplements and the effects of the trial intervention on vascular events, justifying analyzing the supplement-naive individuals separately. In this group of 16,000 women, an increase in clinical myocardial infarction of 22% was found, similar to the findings with calcium supplements alone.25

Thus, there is consistent evidence that introducing a calcium supplement de novo increases the risk of myocardial infarction (Figure 2).16,25–31 We calculate that treating 1,000 patients with calcium or calcium plus vitamin D for 5 years would cause an additional 6 myocardial infarctions or strokes (number needed to harm 178) and prevent only 3 fractures (number needed to treat 302).25

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Effect of calcium supplements on cardiovascular events, with or without vitamin D. Data for 28,072 participants in 8 trials of calcium supplements with trial-level data, plus data for Women’s Health Initiative CaD study participants not taking calcium supplements at baseline.

Bolland MJ, Grey A, Avenell A, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 342:d2040.

ARE VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS EFFECTIVE?

Vitamin D is highly effective in treating osteomalacia, improving symptoms within days and increasing bone density by as much as 50% over 1 year.32,33 In contrast, randomized controlled trials of vitamin D supplements alone in people without osteomalacia have not shown increases in bone density or changes in fracture risk.34–37

In 2017, my colleagues and I published a trial showing that vitamin D supplementation increases bone density by 2% to 3% in the spine and femoral neck in participants with baseline 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 30-nmol/L (12 ng/mL), but those starting above this level showed no effect (Figure 3).38 And a reanalysis of an earlier study confirmed this 30 nmol/L threshold for an effect of vitamin D on bone density.39 The finding of a clear-cut threshold for vitamin D effects is predicted by the physiologic considerations set out above.

Figure 3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3

Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline to 2 years in the vitamin D and placebo groups of the Vitamin D Assessment study, according to baseline serum 25(OH)D (25-hydroxyvitamin D) concentrations. Data are mean ± 95% confidence intervals. P values are shown for between-group comparisons.

Reid IR, Horne AM, Mihov B, et al. Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D on bone density in community-dwelling older adults substudy of a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 2017; 282(5):452–460. Copyright 2017, The Association for the Publication of the Journal of Internal Medicine.

Belief that higher levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D are better is based on observational data. However, correlation does not prove causation, and it is likely that causation is reversed here. Those with better health are likely to spend more time exercising outdoors, are less likely to be obese, and are less likely to have inflammatory conditions; and as a result, they are more likely to have better vitamin D status. We should now be using trial-based definitions of vitamin D deficiency as opposed to thresholds derived from disease associations in observational studies.

Vitamin D supplements have also been suggested to benefit cardiovascular health and to reduce cancer risk, though current clinical trial data provide no support for these hypotheses.36,40 Other trials addressing these questions are ongoing.

ARE VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS SAFE?

The safety of vitamin D supplements has generally been assessed with respect to the incidence of hypercalcemia. On this basis, very high doses have been promoted. However, there is now evidence that doses of 4,000 IU/ day, 60,000 IU/month, and 500,000 IU/year increase the risk of falls and fractures.41,42

The threshold for bone benefits discussed above (12 ng/mL) is easily exceeded with doses of vitamin D of 400 to 1,000 IU/day. At these levels, vitamin D supplements have no known adverse effects and can be widely endorsed for individuals at risk of deficiency. Supplement doses greater than 2,000 IU/day should be used only in exceptional circumstances, and with appropriate monitoring.

LITTLE USE FOR CALCIUM AND VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS

Extensive clinical trials have failed to demonstrate meaningful benefit from calcium supplements in the management of osteoporosis. Calcium supplements are often prescribed in patients who are receiving other treatments for osteoporosis, which may be justified with interventions that have the potential to cause hypocalcemia, but their coadministration with bisphosphonates has been shown to be unnecessary.

Calcium supplements commonly cause gastrointestinal symptoms that are sometimes severe and are likely to contribute to high levels of noncompliance with osteoporosis medications. They increase the risk of kidney stones,8 and there is reasonable evidence to suggest an adverse effect on vascular risk as well.23

Vitamin D deficiency is common in frail elderly people, particularly those with dark skin or living at high latitudes. Low doses of vitamin D are safe and highly effective in preventing osteomalacia. But vitamin D supplements are unnecessary in those who regularly have sun exposure. And high doses of vitamin D have no demonstrated advantage and have been shown to increase the risk of falls and fractures.

Our decision to prescribe calcium and vitamin D supplements should be based on evidence that is of the same quality as for any other intervention we prescribe. Current evidence suggests that there is little reason to prescribe calcium, and that vitamin D should be targeted at those at risk of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels less than 12 ng/mL.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Reid has disclosed consulting for Amgen and Merck and teaching and speaking for Amgen and Eli Lilly. He is supported by the Health Research Council of New Zealand.

  • Copyright © 2018 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Grey A,
    2. Bolland M
    . Web of industry, advocacy, and academia in the management of osteoporosis. BMJ 2015; 351:h3170. doi:10.1136/bmj.h3170
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Bristow SM,
    3. Bolland MJ
    . Calcium supplements: benefits and risks. J Intern Med 2015; 278(4):354–368. doi:10.1111/joim.12394
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Grey AB,
    3. Ames RW,
    4. Horne AM,
    5. Gamble GD,
    6. Reid IR
    . Fat mass is an important predictor of parathyroid hormone levels in postmenopausal women. Bone 2006; 38(3):317–321. doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.08.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. International Osteoporosis Foundation
    . Calcium map. www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-and-statistics/calcium-map. Accessed July 10, 2018.
  5. ↵
    1. Lieben L,
    2. Masuyama R,
    3. Torrekens S,
    4. et al
    . Normocalcemia is maintained in mice under conditions of calcium malabsorption by vitamin D-induced inhibition of bone mineralization. J Clin Invest 2012; 122(5):1803–1815. doi:10.1172/JCI45890
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Rossini M,
    2. Gatti D,
    3. Viapiana O,
    4. et al
    . Short-term effects on bone turnover markers of a single high dose of oral vitamin D3. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97(4):E622–E626. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2448
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Tai V,
    2. Leung W,
    3. Grey A,
    4. Reid IR,
    5. Bolland MJ
    . Calcium intake and bone mineral density: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015; 351:h4183. doi:10.1136/bmj.h4183
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Jackson RD,
    2. LaCroix AZ,
    3. Gass M,
    4. et al
    5. Women’s Health Initiative Investigators
    . Calcium plus vitamin D supplementation and the risk of fractures. N Engl J Med 2006; 354(7):669–683. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa055218
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grant AM,
    2. Avenell A,
    3. Campbell MK,
    4. et al
    5. RECORD Trial Group
    . Oral vitamin D3 and calcium for secondary prevention of low-trauma fractures in elderly people (Randomised Evaluation of Calcium Or vitamin D, RECORD): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 365:(9471)1621–1628. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)63013-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Prince RL,
    2. Devine A,
    3. Dhaliwal SS,
    4. Dick IM
    . Effects of calcium supplementation on clinical fracture and bone structure: results of a 5-year, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in elderly women. Arch Intern Med 2006; 166(8):869–875. doi:10.1001/archinte.166.8.869
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Mason B,
    3. Horne A,
    4. et al
    . Randomized controlled trial of calcium in healthy older women. Am J Med 2006; 119(9):777–785. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2006.02.038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Salovaara K,
    2. Tuppurainen M,
    3. Karkkainen M,
    4. et al
    . Effect of vitamin D-3 and calcium on fracture risk in 65-to 71-year-old women: a population-based 3-year randomized, controlled trial—the OSTPRE-FPS. J Bone Miner Res 2010; 25(7):1487–1495. doi:10.1002/jbmr.48
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Moyer VA,
    2. US Preventive Services Task Force
    . Vitamin D and calcium supplementation to prevent fractures in adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158(9):691–696. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00603
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Chapuy MC,
    2. Arlot ME,
    3. Duboeuf F,
    4. et al
    . Vitamin D3 and calcium to prevent hip fractures in elderly women. N Engl J Med 1992; 327(23):1637–1642. doi:10.1056/NEJM199212033272305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Tang BMP,
    2. Eslick GD,
    3. Nowson C,
    4. Smith C,
    5. Bensoussan A
    . Use of calcium or calcium in combination with vitamin D supplementation to prevent fractures and bone loss in people aged 50 years and older: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2007; 370(9588):657–666. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61342-7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Bonnick S,
    2. Broy S,
    3. Kaiser F,
    4. et al
    . Treatment with alendronate plus calcium, alendronate alone, or calcium alone for postmenopausal low bone mineral density. Curr Med Res Opin 2007; 23(6):1341–1349. doi:10.1185/030079907X188035
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. McCloskey EV,
    2. Beneton M,
    3. Charlesworth D,
    4. et al
    . Clodronate reduces the incidence of fractures in community-dwelling elderly women unselected for osteoporosis: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized study. J Bone Miner Res 2007; 22(1):135–141. doi:10.1359/jbmr.061008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lindsay R,
    2. Hart DM,
    3. Forrest C,
    4. Baird C
    . Prevention of spinal osteoporosis in oophorectomised women. Lancet 1980; 2(8205):1151–1154. pmid:6107766
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Cauley JA,
    2. Robbins J,
    3. Chen Z,
    4. et al
    5. Women’s Health Initiative Investigators
    . Effects of estrogen plus progestin on risk of fracture and bone mineral density: the Women’s Health Initiative randomized trial. JAMA 2003; 290(13):1729–1738. doi:10.1001/jama.290.13.1729
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Reid I,
    2. Horne A,
    3. Mihov B,
    4. et al
    . Abstracts of the ECTS Congress 2018: Zoledronate every 18 months for 6 years in osteopenic postmenopausal women reduces non-vertebral fractures and height loss. Calcif Tissue Int 2018; 102:S22–S23. doi:10.1007/s00223-018-0418-0:24
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Lewis JR,
    2. Zhu K,
    3. Prince RL
    . Adverse events from calcium supplementation: relationship to errors in myocardial infarction self-reporting in randomized controlled trials of calcium supplementation. J Bone Miner Res 2012; 27(3):719–722. doi:10.1002/jbmr.1484
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gallagher JC,
    2. Smith LM,
    3. Yalamanchili V
    . Incidence of hypercalciuria and hypercalcemia during vitamin D and calcium supplementation in older women. Menopause 2014; 21(11):1173–1180. doi:10.1097/GME.0000000000000270
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Bristow SM,
    3. Bolland MJ
    . Calcium and cardiovascular disease. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 2017; 32(3):339–349. doi:10.3803/EnM.2017.32.3.339
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hsia J,
    2. Heiss G,
    3. Ren H,
    4. et al
    5. Women’s Health Initiative Investigators
    . Calcium/vitamin D supplementation and cardiovascular events. Circulation 2007; 115(7):846–854. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.673491
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Grey A,
    3. Avenell A,
    4. Gamble GD,
    5. Reid IR
    . Calcium supplements with or without vitamin D and risk of cardiovascular events: reanalysis of the Women’s Health Initiative limited access dataset and meta-analysis. BMJ 2011; 342:d2040. doi:10.1136/bmj.d2040
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Baron JA,
    2. Beach M,
    3. Mandel JS,
    4. et al
    . Calcium supplements for the prevention of colorectal adenomas. Calcium Polyp Prevention Study Group. N Engl J Med 1999; 340(3):101–107. doi:10.1056/NEJM199901143400204
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Barber PA,
    3. Doughty RN,
    4. et al
    . Vascular events in healthy older women receiving calcium supplementation: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2008; 336(7638):262–266. doi:10.1136/bmj.39440.525752.BE
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lappe JM,
    2. Travers-Gustafson D,
    3. Davies KM,
    4. Recker RR,
    5. Heaney RP
    . Vitamin D and calcium supplementation reduces cancer risk: results of a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2007; 85(6):1586–1591. doi:10.1093/ajcn/85.6.1586
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Ames R,
    3. Mason B,
    4. et al
    . Randomized controlled trial of calcium supplementation in healthy, non-osteoporotic, older men. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168(20):2276–2282. doi:10.1001/archinte.168.20.2276
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Ames RW,
    3. Evans MC,
    4. Gamble GD,
    5. Sharpe SJ
    . Effect of calcium supplementation on bone loss in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 1993; 328(7):460–464. doi:10.1056/NEJM199302183280702
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Ames RW,
    3. Evans MC,
    4. Gamble GD,
    5. Sharpe SJ
    . Long-term effects of calcium supplementation on bone loss and fractures in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Med 1995; 98(4):331–335. doi:10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80310-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Al-Ali H,
    2. Fuleihan GE
    . Nutritional osteomalacia: substantial clinical improvement and gain in bone density posttherapy. J Clin Densitom 2000; 3(1):97–101. pmid:10745306
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. El-Desouki MI,
    2. Othman SM,
    3. Fouda MA
    . Bone mineral density and bone scintigraphy in adult Saudi female patients with osteomalacia. Saudi Med J 2004; 25(3):355–358.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Bolland MJ,
    3. Grey A
    . Effects of vitamin D supplements on bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2014; 383(9912):146–155. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61647-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Avenell A,
    2. Mak JC,
    3. O’Connell D
    . Vitamin D and vitamin D analogues for preventing fractures in post-menopausal women and older men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (4):CD000227. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000227.pub4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Bolland MJ,
    2. Grey A,
    3. Gamble GD,
    4. Reid IR
    . The effect of vitamin D supplementation on skeletal, vascular, or cancer outcomes: a trial sequential meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2(4):307–320. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(13)70212-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. DIPART (Vitamin D Individual Patient Analysis of Randomized Trials) Group
    . Patient level pooled analysis of 68 500 patients from seven major vitamin D fracture trials in US and Europe. BMJ 2010; 340:b5463. doi:10.1136/bmj.b5463
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Reid IR,
    2. Horne AM,
    3. Mihov B,
    4. et al
    . Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D on bone density in community-dwelling older adults substudy of a randomized controlled trial. J Intern Med 2017; 282(5):452–460. doi:10.1111/joim.12651
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. MacDonald HM,
    2. Reid IR,
    3. Gamble GD,
    4. Fraser WD,
    5. Tang JC,
    6. Wood AD
    . 25-Hydroxyvitamin D threshold for the effects of vitamin D supplements on bone density secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Miner Res 2018. Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1002/jbmr.3442
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  31. ↵
    1. Scragg R,
    2. Stewart AW,
    3. Waayer D,
    4. et al
    . Effect of monthly high-dose vitamin D supplementation on cardiovascular disease in the vitamin D assessment study: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol 2017; 2(6):608–616. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2017.0175
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Sanders KM,
    2. Stuart AL,
    3. Williamson EJ,
    4. et al
    . Annual high-dose oral vitamin D and falls and fractures in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010; 303(18):1815–1822. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.594
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Smith LM,
    2. Gallagher JC,
    3. Suiter C
    . Medium doses of daily vitamin D decrease falls and higher doses of daily vitamin D3 increase falls: a randomized clinical trial. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2017; 173:317–322. doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2017.03.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 85 (9)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 85, Issue 9
1 Sep 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Calcium and vitamin D: To supplement or not?
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Calcium and vitamin D: To supplement or not?
Ian R. Reid
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Sep 2018, 85 (9) 693-698; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.18026

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Calcium and vitamin D: To supplement or not?
Ian R. Reid
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Sep 2018, 85 (9) 693-698; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.85a.18026
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • BONE METABOLISM IS TIGHTLY REGULATED
    • ARE CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTS EFFECTIVE?
    • ARE CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTS SAFE?
    • ARE VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS EFFECTIVE?
    • ARE VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS SAFE?
    • LITTLE USE FOR CALCIUM AND VITAMIN D SUPPLEMENTS
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Respiratory virus season: Strategies for successful navigation
  • Matter of the heart: Prioritizing harm reduction in managing infective endocarditis associated with injection drug use
  • Effective but inaccessible antiobesity medications: A call for sharing responsibility for improving access to evidence-based care
Show more Commentary

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Drug Therapy
  • Endocrinology
  • Geriatrics
  • Preventive Care

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire