Index by author
Arnold, Anita M.
- You have accessA pregnant woman with shortness of breathJames K. Stoller, MD, Janis A. Roberts, DO and Anita M. Arnold, DOCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 19-22;
The authors guide the reader through a challenging diagnosis.
Bakst, Alan
- You have accessLabetalol and other agents that block both alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptorsDonald G. Vidt, MD, Alan Bakst, PharmD, Carolyn J. Pearce, MD and J. David Wallin, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 59-69;
A review of how these agents can be used in managing difficult-to-control hypertension.
Brouhard, Ben H.
- You have accessGlycemic control and complications of diabetes mellitus: practical implications of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)Byron J. Hoogwerf, MD and Ben H. Brouhard, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 34-37;
The DCCT results provide new impetus to find better ways to achieve near-normal glycemia.
Castle, Lon W.
- You have accessDurability of bipolar coaxial endocardial pacemaker leads compared with unipolar leadsMarcelo E. Helguera, MD, Sergio L. Pinski, MD, James D. Maloney, MD, Javier R. Woscoboinik, MD, Richard G. Trohman, MD, Victor A. Morant, MD, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD and Lon W. Castle, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 25-28;
Bipolar coaxial leads are preferable to unipolar leads in most aspects. Yet survival of bipolar coaxial leads in long-term follow-up studies seems worse than that of unipolar leads, indicating the need to reevaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the coaxial design.
Helguera, Marcelo E.
- You have accessDurability of bipolar coaxial endocardial pacemaker leads compared with unipolar leadsMarcelo E. Helguera, MD, Sergio L. Pinski, MD, James D. Maloney, MD, Javier R. Woscoboinik, MD, Richard G. Trohman, MD, Victor A. Morant, MD, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD and Lon W. Castle, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 25-28;
Bipolar coaxial leads are preferable to unipolar leads in most aspects. Yet survival of bipolar coaxial leads in long-term follow-up studies seems worse than that of unipolar leads, indicating the need to reevaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the coaxial design.
Hoogwerf, Byron J.
- You have accessGlycemic control and complications of diabetes mellitus: practical implications of the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)Byron J. Hoogwerf, MD and Ben H. Brouhard, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 34-37;
The DCCT results provide new impetus to find better ways to achieve near-normal glycemia.
Kanoti, George A.
- You have accessIn reply: DNR orders and length of stayGeorge A. Kanoti, STDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 79;
Kovaks, Andrea
- You have accessLong-term follow-up of children after repair of atrial septal defectsJames Mandelik, MD, Douglas S. Moodie, MD, Richard Sterba, MD, Daniel Murphy, MD, Eliot Rosenkranz, MD, Sharon Medendorp, MPH and Andrea Kovaks, BSCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 29-33;
The authors advocate repair of atrial septal defects as early as possible, definitely "before age 5, in order to minimize long-term complications of left-to-right shunting.
Longworth, David L.
- You have accessA pregnant woman with shortness of breathJames K. Stoller, MD, Janis A. Roberts, DO and Anita M. Arnold, DOCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 19-22;
The authors guide the reader through a challenging diagnosis.
Maloney, James D.
- You have accessDurability of bipolar coaxial endocardial pacemaker leads compared with unipolar leadsMarcelo E. Helguera, MD, Sergio L. Pinski, MD, James D. Maloney, MD, Javier R. Woscoboinik, MD, Richard G. Trohman, MD, Victor A. Morant, MD, Bruce L. Wilkoff, MD and Lon W. Castle, MDCleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine January 1994, 61 (1) 25-28;
Bipolar coaxial leads are preferable to unipolar leads in most aspects. Yet survival of bipolar coaxial leads in long-term follow-up studies seems worse than that of unipolar leads, indicating the need to reevaluate the risk-benefit ratio of the coaxial design.