Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Review

Reproductive planning for women after solid-organ transplant

Mina Al-Badri, MBCHB, Juliana M. Kling, MD, MPH and Suneela Vegunta, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine September 2017, 84 (9) 719-728; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.84a.16116
Mina Al-Badri
Department of Internal Medicine, St. Joseph’s Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Juliana M. Kling
Division of Women’s Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Suneela Vegunta
Division of Women’s Health Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    TABLE 1

    Counseling topics for women of childbearing age after solid-organ transplant

    The risks of an unintended pregnancy are always greater than the risks of any contraceptive.
    A good possibility exists of normal fertility after a solid-organ transplant. Immunosuppressive agents are associated with substantial teratogenic risk.
    Pregnancy is associated with a higher than normal risk of fetal and maternal complications, so close monitoring is required.
    A potentially negative impact of pregnancy on graft function soon after transplant must be considered; waiting 1 year after transplant to become pregnant provides the best chance of a good pregnancy outcome.
    Two forms of effective contraception should be used until it is safe to conceive
    • Based on information in reference 1.

    • View popup
    TABLE 2

    Pregnancy and lactation considerations of common immunosuppresant drugs

    MedicationPregnancy exposure registry informationPregnancy categoryLactation considerations
    PrednisoneCrosses the placenta
    Can cause clefts and decreased birth weight when used in the first trimester
    When needed: can consider using the lowest effective dose for the shortest possible time in the second and third trimesters
    C or D, depending on the trimester and doseExcreted in breast milk
    Potential for adverse events; risk-benefit assessment needed
    Mycophenolate mofetilIncreased risk of first-trimester pregnancy loss and congenital malformationsDLittle information available, but breast-feeding not recommended
    AzathioprineCrosses the placenta
    Congenital anomalies, immunosuppression, and intrauterine growth retardation have been reported
    Pregnancy should be avoided during treatment
    DBreast-feeding not recommended, given adverse effects and excretion in breast milk
    CyclosporineCrosses the placenta
    Can lead to premature birth and low birth weight
    Should be avoided during the first trimester
    CExcreted in milk; risk-benefit assessment needed
    TacrolimusCrosses the placenta
    Can cause low birth weight, neonatal hyperkalemia, and neonatal renal dysfunction
    CBreast-feeding not recommended, given adverse effects and excretion in breast milk
    EverolimusCrosses the placenta
    May cause fetal harm
    Pregnancy should be avoided
    Birth control should be continued for 8 weeks following drug cessation
    CNot known whether it is excreted in breast milk; breast-feeding not recommended
    SirolimusAdverse events have been observed in animal studies.CNot known whether it is excreted in breast milk; risk-benefit assessment needed
    BelataceptAdverse events have been observedCNot known whether it is excreted in breast milk; breast-feeding not recommended
    • Based on information from reference 18.

    • View popup
    TABLE 3

    Contraceptive methods currently rated ‘very effective’

    Type of contraceptionHow it worksFailure rateaAdvantagesDisadvantages
    Female sterilizationEither the tubes are tied and then cut, or a coil is inserted into the tubes< 1%Permanent; no further medicines or procedures required to prevent pregnancyReversal is seldom successful and is expensive; imaging is required to confirm occlusion of tubes; coils take 3–4 months to be fully effective
    Male sterilization (vasectomy)Interruption or occlusion of the male tubes< 1%Safer, less costly, and shorter recovery time than tubal ligationReversal is not always successful; does not work immediately: 3–4 months required with frequent sperm testing
    ImplantContains a progestin hormone; implanted in the upper arm, slowly releases hormone into the body and lasts 3 years< 1%Provides highly effective, prolonged contraception without estrogen; fertility returns rapidly after removal of the rodUnscheduled bleeding is common; implants can be difficult to remove, and infection or scarring can occur at the insertion/removal site
    Intrauterine device (IUD)2 types: hormonal (progestin, lasting 3–5 years) and nonhormonal (copper, lasting at least 10 years)< 1%Highly effective, long-acting; fertility returns within 1 month (copper IUD) or 1 year (progestin IUD)Possible uterine perforation (rare, ≤ 1 in 1,000), expulsion of the IUD, increased risk of pelvic infection in the first 20 days after insertion
    • ↵a Within first year

    • Based on information in references 21 and 23.

    • View popup
    TABLE 4

    Contraceptive methods rated ‘effective’

    Type of contraceptionHow it worksFailure rateaAdvantagesDisadvantages
    Injectable contraceptivesA long-lasting progestin is injected into the muscle or under the skin every 12 weeks< 1%–6%Provides effective, prolonged contraception with no exposure to estrogen; return to fertility in 6–12 monthsMay cause weight gain and mood changes; can also cause amenorrhea
    PatchEstrogen and progestin are absorbed through the skin; applied once a week for 3 weeks; no patch during week 4< 1%–9%Easy to use; return to fertility in a few cycles; can be used continuously for ovulation suppression and menstrual regulationCan cause localized skin rash; may detach
    Vaginal ringEstrogen and progestin are absorbed through the vagina; placed in vagina for 3 weeks of every month< 1%–9%Easy to use; fertility returns in a few monthsLocal symptoms, such as increased vaginal discharge
    Combined oral contraceptivesContain both estrogen and progestin taken once a day for 3 weeks of every month or 3 months (extended cycle)< 1%–9%Reduces menstrual cramps and menorrhagia; easy to use; return to fertility in a few monthsIntermittent bleeding and spotting are the most common adverse effects; increased risk of thrombosis; should be taken at the same time every day
    Extended-cycle combined oral contraceptivesCan be taken continuously for 3 weeks< 1%–9%Reduces menstrual cramps and menorrhagiaIntermittent bleeding and spotting are the most common adverse effects
    Progestin-only pillsContain progestin only, taken daily< 1%–9%Can be used by women who cannot use estrogenVaginal bleeding and spotting are common; fertility may take a few months to return after contraception discontinued; should be taken consistently every day at the same time every day
    • ↵a Within first year; lower number is with ideal consistent use, whereas higher number is with typical use.

    • Based on information in references 21 and 23.

    • View popup
    TABLE 5

    Contraceptive methods rated ‘moderately effective’

    Type of contraceptionHow it worksFailure rateaAdvantagesDisadvantages
    Male condomPhysical barrier to sperm2%–18%Best protection against sexually transmitted diseaseCan break; must be used consistently to be effective
    Female condomPhysical barrier to sperm5%–21%Can be placed before intercourse; protects against sexually transmitted diseaseMore expensive than male condoms; must be used consistently to be effective
    DiaphragmPhysical barrier to sperm6%–12%Can be inserted 6-8 hours before a sexual encounter and can be reused; slight reduction in risk of some sexually transmitted diseases (not human immunodeficiency virus)May increase the risk of urinary tract infections; effective only when used with a spermicide; must be used consistently to be effective
    • ↵a Within first year; lower number is with ideal consistent use, whereas higher number is with typical use.

    • Based on information in references 21 and 23

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 84 (9)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 84, Issue 9
1 Sep 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Reproductive planning for women after solid-organ transplant
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Reproductive planning for women after solid-organ transplant
Mina Al-Badri, Juliana M. Kling, Suneela Vegunta
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Sep 2017, 84 (9) 719-728; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.84a.16116

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Reproductive planning for women after solid-organ transplant
Mina Al-Badri, Juliana M. Kling, Suneela Vegunta
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Sep 2017, 84 (9) 719-728; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.84a.16116
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • ABSTRACT
    • TRANSPLANTS IN WOMEN ARE INCREASING
    • FERTILITY IN WOMEN WITH END-STAGE RENAL DISEASE
    • TERATOGENICITY OF IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS
    • CRITERIA FOR A SUCCESSFUL PREGNANCY
    • CONTRACEPTIVE COUNSELING AFTER TRANSPLANT
    • VERY EFFECTIVE CONTRACEPTIVES (UNINTENDED PREGNANCY RATE 0%–0.9%)
    • EFFECTIVE CONTRACEPTIVE METHODS (UNINTENDED PREGNANCY RATE 1%-9%)
    • MODERATELY EFFECTIVE METHODS (PREGNANCY RATE 10%-25%)
    • LESS-EFFECTIVE METHODS
    • KNOW YOUR OPTIONS
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Alpha-gal syndrome: Recognizing and managing a tick-bite–related meat allergy
  • Managing right ventricular failure in the setting of pulmonary embolism
  • Psychedelics, spirituality, and existential distress in patients at the end of life
Show more Review

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Drug Therapy
  • Gastroenterology
  • Nephrology
  • Women's Health

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire