Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
Editorial

Follow-up blood cultures are often needed after bacteremia

Marisa Tungsiripat, MD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine February 2019, 86 (2) 93-94; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.18114
Marisa Tungsiripat
Head, Section of HIV, Department of Infectious Disease, Cleveland Clinic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Bacteremia is common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Bloodstream infections rank among the leading causes of death in North America and Europe.1

See related article, page 89

In this issue, Mushtaq et al2 contend that follow-up blood cultures after initial bacteremia are not needed for most hospitalized patients. Not repeating blood cultures after initial bacteremia has been proposed to decrease hospitalization length, consultations, and healthcare costs in some clinical settings. However, without follow-up cultures, it can be difficult to assess the adequacy of treatment of bacteremia and associated underlying infections.

GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS

Results of retrospective studies indicate that follow-up cultures may not be routinely needed for gram-negative bacteremia. In a review by Canzoneri et al of 383 cases with subsequent follow-up cultures,3 55 (14%) were positive. The mean duration of bacteremia was 2.8 days (range 1 to 15 days). Of the 55 persistently positive blood cultures, only 8 (15%) were caused by gram-negative organisms. Limitations to this study included the lack of patient outcome data, a low event rate, and the retrospective design.4

In a retrospective case-control study of follow-up cultures for 862 episodes of Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia,5 independent risk factors for persistent bacteremia were intraabdominal infection, higher Charlson comorbidity index score, solid-organ transplant, and unfavorable treatment response.

These studies confirm that persistent bacteremia is uncommon with gram-negative organisms. They also support using comorbidities and treatment response to guide the ordering of follow-up blood cultures.

WHEN IS FOLLOW-UP CULTURE USEFUL?

Although follow-up blood cultures may not be needed routinely in patients with gram-negative bacteremia, it would be difficult to extrapolate this to gram-positive organisms, especially Staphylococcus aureus.

In Canzoneri et al,3 43 (78%) of the 55 positive follow-up cultures were due to gram-positive organisms. Factors associated with positive follow-up cultures were concurrent fever, presence of a central intravenous line, end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, and diabetes mellitus. In addition, infectious disease consultation to decide the need for follow-up cultures for S aureus bacteremia has been associated with fewer deaths, fewer relapses, and lower readmission rates.6,7

In certain clinical scenarios, follow-up blood cultures can provide useful information, such as when the source of bacteremia is endocarditis or cardiac device infection, a vascular graft, or an intravascular line. In the Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines for diagnosis and management of catheter-related bloodstream infections, persistent or relapsing bacteremia for some organisms is a criterion for removal of a long-term central venous catheter.8

Follow-up cultures are especially useful when the focus of infection is protected from antibiotic penetration, such as in the central nervous system, joints, and abdominal or other abscess. These foci may require drainage for cure. In these cases or in the setting of unfavorable clinical treatment response, follow-up blood cultures showing persistent bacteremia can prompt a search for unaddressed or incompletely addressed foci of infection and allow for source control.

The timing of follow-up cultures is generally 1 to 2 days after the initial culture. Although Mushtaq et al propose a different approach, traditional teaching has been that the last blood culture should not be positive, and this leads to ordering follow-up blood cultures until clearance of bacteremia is documented.

  • Copyright © 2019 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Goto M,
    2. Al-Hasan MN
    . Overall burden of bloodstream infection and nosocomial bloodstream infection in North America and Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19(6):501–509. doi:10.1111/1469-0691.12195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Mushtaq A,
    2. Bredell B,
    3. Soubani A
    . Repeating blood cultures after an initial bacteremia: when and how often? Cleve Clin J Med 2019; 86(2):89–92. doi:10.3949/ccjm.86a.18001
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Canzoneri CN,
    2. Akhavan BJ,
    3. Tosur Z,
    4. Andrade PEA,
    5. Aisenberg GM
    . Follow-up blood cultures in gram-negative bacteremia: are they needed? Clin Infect Dis 2017; 65(11):1776–1779. doi:10.1093/cid/cix648
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Jones RB,
    2. Paruchuri A,
    3. Shah SS
    . Prospective trials are required to alter practice for follow-up blood cultures for gram-negative bacilli bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2018; 67(2):315–316. doi:10.1093/cid/ciy070
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Kang CK,
    2. Kim ES,
    3. Song KH,
    4. et al
    . Can a routine follow-up blood culture be justified in Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteremia? A retrospective case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13:365. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-365
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Honda H,
    2. Krauss MJ,
    3. Jones JC,
    4. Olsen MA,
    5. Warren DK
    . The value of infectious diseases consultation in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Am J Med 2010; 123(7):631–637. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2010.01.015
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fowler VG Jr.,
    2. Sanders LL,
    3. Sexton DJ,
    4. et al
    . Outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia according to compliance with recommendations of infectious diseases specialists: experience with 244 patients. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 27(3):478–486. pmid:9770144
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Mermel LA,
    2. Allon M,
    3. Bouza E,
    4. et al
    . Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of intravascular catheter-related infection: 2009 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 2009; 49(1):1–45. doi:10.1086/599376
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 86 (2)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 86, Issue 2
1 Feb 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Follow-up blood cultures are often needed after bacteremia
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Follow-up blood cultures are often needed after bacteremia
Marisa Tungsiripat
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Feb 2019, 86 (2) 93-94; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18114

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Follow-up blood cultures are often needed after bacteremia
Marisa Tungsiripat
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Feb 2019, 86 (2) 93-94; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.86a.18114
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • GRAM-NEGATIVE ORGANISMS
    • WHEN IS FOLLOW-UP CULTURE USEFUL?
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • Repeating blood cultures after initial bacteremia: When and how often?
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Fever and infections in surgical intensive care: an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Critical Care Committee clinical consensus document
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The beat goes on: Highlights from the new American and European A-fib guidelines
  • Subclinical hypothyroidism: What’s in a name?
  • Heart to heart: Progress in cardiovascular disease prevention for people living with HIV
Show more Editorial

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Cardiology
  • Hospital Medicine
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Vascular Medicine

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire