Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org

User menu

  • Register
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
  • Other Publications
    • www.clevelandclinic.org
  • Register
  • Log in
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Ahead of Print
    • Past Issues
    • Supplements
    • Article Type
  • Specialty
    • Articles by Specialty
  • CME/MOC
    • Articles
    • Calendar
  • Info For
    • Manuscript Submission
    • Authors & Reviewers
    • Subscriptions
    • About CCJM
    • Contact Us
    • Media Kit
  • Conversations with Leaders
  • Conference Coverage
    • Kidney Week 2024
    • CHEST 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • Kidney Week 2023
    • ObesityWeek 2023
    • IDWeek 2023
    • CHEST 2023
    • MDS 2023
    • IAS 2023
    • ACP 2023
    • AAN 2023
    • ACC / WCC 2023
    • AAAAI Meeting 2023
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • Kidney Week 2022
    • AIDS 2022
From the Editor

Awareness can prompt the search for clinical zebras

Brian F. Mandell, MD, PhD
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine March 2021, 88 (3) 133-134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.88b.03021
Brian F. Mandell
Roles: Editor in Chief
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Find this author on Cleveland Clinic
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Embedded Image

I recently read a book of personal reflections on approaching patient care by Roger Cass, an experienced internist/rheumatologist, Diagnosis: Clinical Skills In Medicine.1 On the heels of that, reading the short paper by Mandzhieva et al2 and the commentary by Rodriguez3 in this issue of the Journal on the median arcuate ligament syndrome (MALS) prompted me to consider the process by which I evaluate patients with certain symptoms. What distinguishes insightful quick diagnosis from premature closure (other than that the diagnosis turns out to be incorrect in the latter)?

As a rheumatologist, I am frequently consulted in the hospital to evaluate acutely ill patients who have a panoply of symptoms, laboratory findings, and sometimes physical examination findings extending across several organ systems. By the time we are asked to see these patients, we are often starting way down the differential diagnosis list, seriously considering the unusual if not the outright arcane possibilities. We are asked to look for the zebras. But that is not usually the case for patients ultimately diagnosed with MALS and others who experience common, regionally localized pain symptoms at their initial presentation to physicians.

As exemplified by the patient described by Mandzhieva et al,2 patients present to us every day with common and seemingly simple “complaints.” At what point do we start to look for zebras when we are hearing familiar hoofbeats? Or for that matter, when do we start expending a patient’s time, money, and sometimes anxiety on efforts to prove those hoofbeats are indeed from horses? We likely all have slightly different philosophic approaches in making these decisions, and our individual thresholds will vary based on the situation: specific patient needs, time pressures in the office, referring physician, and our anecdotal memory of recent similar patients, which introduce bias to our clinical analysis.

After this past week, when I was seeing patients in clinic with internal medicine residents, I reflected on why I had pontificated the way I did on the specific use and avoidance of testing for less common entities. In a rheumatology clinic, testing decisions invariably involve serologies, for which my mantra is that the specific clinical history and physical examination should dictate specific serologic testing, and panserologic testing should not be obtained to divine the diagnosis. What specific experiences have led me to this relative testing nihilism compared with some of my highly skilled colleagues? I am not sure.

What of the patient discussed here,2 who had abdominal pain, normal basic laboratory tests, and a minimally suggestive examination? As I read the clinical presentation, I wondered at what point I would have embarked on an aggressive diagnostic approach. The history is truncated, but I am sure the decision to embark on a series of initially focused tests was influenced by the “vibe” the physicians received from the patient (much tougher to glean from a virtual visit in this age of COVID-19). Perhaps the decision was driven by the recognition of chronicity of related symptoms, or that this specific clinical event was far more severe than what was anticipated from reflux alone, or that the symptoms didn’t respond to treatment as anticipated. The ultimate suspected diagnosis attained from imaging was not likely anticipated.

It is not certain whether the pain associated with MALS is of vascular or neurogenic origin, or both.3 Several other syndromes can present with intermittent abdominal pain from intermittent gut ischemia. Once atherosclerotic and thromboembolic causes are believed to be less likely, diagnostic considerations are dominated by uncommon conditions. In my clinic, vasculitic syndromes are the initial ones we try to confirm or exclude, and this invariably involves vascular imaging. Although imaging provides far more direct information than serologies, the results are not always straightforward. The pattern of findings (stenoses, aneurysms, or dissections), in the context of the clinical history and examination, helps to distinguish atherosclerosis and vasculitis from their mimics.4,5 As Rodriguez points out, diagnosing the uncommon requires “meticulous evaluation to rule out more common pathology.”3

Circling back to my original effort to understand what prompts me, or any clinician, to look hard for the uncommon causes of common symptoms, it seems to be the gestalt that speaks to some part of the total patient presentation that doesn’t quite fit the expected. The relative value of this gestalt stems from the breadth of our personal experience, which is always limited. We may not all be confronted on a daily basis with the specific challenge of deciding whether to treat a patient for MALS. But reading about this and other less common syndromes contributes to our warehoused cognitive experience and, hopefully, provides impetus for a bit of extra reflection before offering up our diagnosis.

  • Copyright © 2021 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All Rights Reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Cass RM
    . Diagnosis: Clinical Skills in Medicine. 2019. Independently published. ISBN-13: 9781689347693
  2. ↵
    1. Mandzhieva B,
    2. Zafar H,
    3. Jain A,
    4. Manoucheri M
    . Median arcuate ligament syndrome: incidental finding or real problem? Cleve Clin J Med 2021; 88(3):140–142. doi:10.3949/ccjm.88a.20052
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rodriguez JH
    . Median arcuate ligament syndrome: a clinical dilemma. Cleve Clin J Med 2021; 88(3):143–144. doi:10.3949/ccjm.88a.21001
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Baker-LePain JC,
    2. Stone DH,
    3. Mattis AN,
    4. Nakamura MC,
    5. Fye KH
    . Clinical diagnosis of segmental arterial mediolysis: differentiation from vasculitis and other mimics. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2010; 62(11):1655–1660. doi:10.1002/acr.20294
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Escárcega RO,
    2. Mathur M,
    3. Franco JJ, et al
    . Nonathersclerotic obstructive vascular diseases of the mesenteric and renal arteries. Clin Cardiol 2014; 37:700–706. doi:10.1002/clc.22305
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine: 88 (3)
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
Vol. 88, Issue 3
1 Mar 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Awareness can prompt the search for clinical zebras
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Awareness can prompt the search for clinical zebras
Brian F. Mandell
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Mar 2021, 88 (3) 133-134; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.88b.03021

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Awareness can prompt the search for clinical zebras
Brian F. Mandell
Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine Mar 2021, 88 (3) 133-134; DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.88b.03021
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Linkedin Share Button

Jump to section

  • Article
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The gift of lasting immunity
  • Psychedelics in the medical toolbox?
  • All sulfa drugs are not created equal
Show more From the Editor

Similar Articles

Subjects

  • Allergy/Immunology
  • Gastroenterology
  • Neurology
  • Rheumatology
  • Vascular Medicine

Navigate

  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Supplements
  • Article Type
  • Specialty
  • CME/MOC Articles
  • CME/MOC Calendar
  • Media Kit

Authors & Reviewers

  • Manuscript Submission
  • Authors & Reviewers
  • Subscriptions
  • About CCJM
  • Contact Us
  • Cleveland Clinic Center for Continuing Education
  • Consult QD

Share your suggestions!

Copyright © 2025 The Cleveland Clinic Foundation. All rights reserved. The information provided is for educational purposes only. Use of this website is subject to the website terms of use and privacy policy. 

Powered by HighWire